Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader: Don’t fall for lie on ‘job-killing regulations’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Galraedia Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:25 PM
Original message
Ralph Nader: Don’t fall for lie on ‘job-killing regulations’
"Masters of the lying sound bite, the craven congressional Republicans are feasting on the health and safety of the American people with gleeful greed while making the corporate and trade association media swoon. “Job-killing regulations” exudes daily from the mouths of Speaker John Boehner, his Wall Street-licking sidekick Eric Cantor and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Then all the way down the line, the Republicans are on cue are bellowing “job-killing regulations” must be revoked or stopped aborning over at OSHA (protecting workers), EPA (protecting clean air and water), FDA (safer drugs and food), and NHTSA (making your vehicle safer). Imagine how much more civil servants could do to accomplish the statutory missions of their respective agencies if they could get the Republicans and their corporate paymasters off their backs........."


More at: http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/column/article_e2d6f7eb-0278-5be7-a1d5-3115489901f0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe if Nader wanted to prevent deregulation, he shouldn't have gotten Bush into office.
I dare say we would have had a very different ten years without the fucking Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You give the SCOTUS so little credit... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. funny how hard they try to absolve Jeb, Katherine Harris, the Felonious Five
and then they call anyone against GOP policies a GOP enabler
funny, that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. The 2000 election would never have gone to the courts without Nader.
Edited on Mon Oct-17-11 12:09 AM by TheWraith
An extra few hundred thousand votes in Florida and today Dubya would be an ex-governor of Texas and failed Presidential candidate. Not to mention there would have been no 9/11, no wars in Afghanistan or Iraq, the economy wouldn't have crashed, and a million plus people would still be alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I doubt that
Nader voted for Bush-Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Discredited, try again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That was over ten years ago
Give it a rest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Like a broken record, the spin is pathetic.
The SCOTUS decided the 2000 elections...sadly some people want to lie and say it was Nader's fault and not the traitorous Bush Dems that did us in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The 2000 election would never have gone to the courts without Nader.
An extra few hundred thousand votes in Florida and today Dubya would be an ex-governor of Texas and failed Presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Not that again... OK here goes...
Since when was Gore entitled to any of the votes Nader got?

Have you asked even one person who voted for Nader in 2000 why they picked Nader instead of Gore?

They had a reason for rejecting Gore and choosing Nader, and you don't have the right to second-guess them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Blame Buchannan too
Thanks to the butterfly ballot, lots of people made a mistake and voted for Pat instead of Al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Galraedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. President Gore would not have fallen for that lie
But since there was no President Gore it matters not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Regulations keep capitalism healthy and vibrant.
What we have now is a perverted form of plutocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. How come the Corsair was the only car considered unsafe enough for Nader to comment on? In history!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC