Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So if this trend continues where will wages be in 10, 20, and 30 years or more?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:31 PM
Original message
So if this trend continues where will wages be in 10, 20, and 30 years or more?
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 07:41 PM by Quixote1818
This chart is startling, not just for what it shows for the past 40 years most of which have been under trickle down economics, as wages have dropped at a very steady rate, but also because it makes you wonder where wages are headed if we continue this trend? At what year will most americans be living below poverty level? If I were Obama I would break out this chart and then show where things are headed and ask the American people if they really want to continue with trickle down economics and eventual poverty for most of the 99% ers.




3. Wages as a percent of the economy are at an all-time low. In other words, corporate profits are at an all-time high, in part, because corporations are paying less of their revenue to employees than they ever have. There are lots of reasons for this, many of which are not the fault of the corporations. (It's a global economy now, and 2-3 billion new low-cost employees in China, India, et al, have recently entered the global workforce. This is putting pressure on wages the world over.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about a flat system where, barter included, people take care of each
others' real needs and community and compassion are far stronger as a result? Deep money needs would not be particularly important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. While I do not have that much faith in human nature - that would be
the direction to travel. For some of us there will be no good answers. I am thinking of my disabled daughter who need a lot of expensive medical help. Even if the family does the actual hands on care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ah, doctors and nurses would be part of it. Need and supply...
It's already beginning at #OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I am hoping. And yes the doctors and care providers are already
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 10:17 PM by jwirr
talking about this. We had a staffing and were discussing what we were worried about. I was surprised to see that even her social worker (care manager) is thinking in terms of what happens if the system collapses. I do know that her foster family is storing supplies and he is working on alternatives to her meds as he is an herbalist. We are doing everything we can.

Does anyone know if the DHS is doing anything about making sure that there is an adequate supply of drugs in this country if we faced some form of isolation from the drug makers? I have seen a lot of documents from the government about scenarios regarding collapse but those reports never include what they are doing to prepare. Other than preparing the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I've been considering that. Hopefully hospitals etc. will jump on it at the first sign of trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. One of these days I am going to get the courage up to ask my
doctor some of these questions. I am afraid of looking crazy to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Good points.
Without my meds, I'd be having more seizures. My father uses meds for his diabetes as diet alone no longer works at his age -83.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. I believe that's called "The Medieval Era." Barter?!
Edited on Mon Oct-17-11 11:33 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. A partial method of taking care of each other. We'll see how it works out
especially through #OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they will keep going lower
as, unless the trade agreements are modified, we will be truly competing with all countries for jobs, and that will be reflected in wages.

Competing against people that make under a dollar an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. In 30 years, fossil fuel supplies will be partially exhausted and GDP may be a lot lower
As cheap energy supplies diminish, the ability to make high returns on capital may diminish faster than returns to labor decline.

Therefore, labor income to GDP may actually increase as the economy deteriorates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. We'll be moving to Mexico for a job that pays better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. When Henry Ford started paying his workers
five dollars a day, the other car makers were outraged, and told him it was a huge mistake and so on. But Ford understood that if the people who made the cars couldn't afford to buy them, there was no real market for cars in the long run.

Today, the CEO's don't seem to understand that their workers need to be able to afford the products they make, or the services the provide. Wages can only go so low, and perhaps they'll decline a lot more, but I'm hoping that a realization will finally dawn. And that certain laws will be passed to equalize a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. In the US ?down Indonesia? up "economic integration" free traders call it
middle class is truly a endangered species in US In China it is (now, but not as it runs it course globally) a growing one


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Same as the last 30 years
declining inflation-adjusted wages with decreasing benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wages are secondary to cost of goods to survive.
Make a chart showing how much things have gone up in price for the same period then overlay them. That is the true picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Interesting that the the Clinton economy saw such a boom in wage growth.
You often see Clinton's economic record reduced to "He was lucky for the stock market/tech bubble." In fact, wages paid to labor increased dramatically as a percentage of the economy despite (because of?) NAFTA in 1994, not the percentage paid to CEO's and investors.

Then, of course, by 2006 (even before his recession started) bush drove the wage share of the economy to below where it was at the start of the Clinton administration.

Looking at the graph it seems that the wage share of the economy has grown under every Democrat (except JFK) and fallen under every republican (no exceptions) with much of the damage coming during and just after recessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. There are going to be wages in 30 years?
Bold prediction!

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC