We the 99% Demand a Totally Different Federal Budget

[davidswanson]

We can fit our demands on a bumpersticker: "Majority Rule" or "People Over Profits" or "Love Not Greed."  But we don't want to.  Our government is doing everything wrong, and we should be allowed to present the full list of grievances.  We can, however, give the world a thousand words' worth in an image, a pie chart to be exact.  Our federal budget funds the wrong things.  We want it to fund the right things.

Here are pie charts produced by some of us members of the 99%: gallery.

Here's where you can make your own: start.

You'll have to register and log in, which prevents spam.  Then you'll have a chance to fill in the percentage of the federal budget that you'd like devoted to various areas.  This budget tool -- the programming for which was done by Karl Anliot -- will let you know if your total adds up to 100%.  You can do this in 60 seconds, but I recommend giving it some thought and really making this into your vision for future activism.

After you create your own ideal budget pie chart, you can compare it with the actual government budget and with the ideal budgets created by the rest of us.  I suspect the biggest gap is going to be between the government and everybody else.  You can also go back in and edit your budget.  You can link to it.  You can facebook it and tweet it.

Below is an image of my ideal federal budget.  I might still change it, but I'm pretty certain of the basics here.  This is discretionary spending, so Social Security and other mandatory spending are not included.  A trust fund into which we pay, trusting that we will be paid back, should never be placed on the chopping block.  Discretionary spending, as the name suggests, is spending over which Congress has discretion each year.

The inner pie chart is broad categories, and the outer layer subcategories for spending.  The yellow-orange area in the lower right is sustainable policies, including job training, mass transit, pollution control, green energy research, etc.  The blue areas include education and research.  The green slices are elements of friendly foreign relations.  The purple is hostile foreign relations, including the military and wars.  The raspberry colored sections cover basic governance, and the little black slice on the right goes to big agriculture and transportation.

Now here's an actual government budget, specifically a budget proposed by the Obama White House for 2015.  The first thing you'll notice is that the military and wars have swallowed everything else.  The rest of the funding areas are all crammed together in teeny little slices over on the right.

The National Priorities Project has produced a very similar pie chart using 2012 numbers, but the numbers used here come from the White House's proposed 2015 budget, also used in this survey which inspired this budget tool.

As much as I sympathize with cries of "jobs not cuts" I wonder if awareness of the state of our budget would lead us to demand that money be moved, that money be cut in one place and added to all the other sectors.  Of course it could also be added to by taxing billionaires and corporations.  But whatever size the pot, our public funds ought to be distributed fairly, humanely, and sustainably.  Perhaps this online tool can help us develop the vision we need moving forward.

Make your own budget here: start.

[Selatius]

1. The bottom pie chart looks like something from a military dictatorship. nt

[tavalon]

4. Shhhhh

We're a representative Republic, not a dictatorship. Yet.

[The Doctor.]

5. No, it doesn't "look like" one. It is one.

Check out North Korea...

[dotymed]

7. [phone]

Most Americans do not realize it, but we are a "military dictatorship." It goes deeper than that, the corporations dictate to the military their desires and the military does all of their "dirty work."

General Smedley Butler informed Americans of this, decades ago. Even domestically, if the corporate PTB decide to overthrow our government, all they have to do is tell the MIC.

Some of you may not remember when the USSR was a viable entity. They had a "Politburo" (their MIC) which had to approve any and all official government decisions. This was overt, everyone knew it, they were acknowledged as the ruling body.

Their "Presidents", etc., were chosen by the "Politburo," openly. If one of their "Presidents" made an independent decision, they were either "set straight" or replaced. America's Politburo is much the same, only they are covert.

[Blue_Tires]

8. funny you should mention that....

[FiveGoodMen]

11. It is.

[truedelphi]

2. The chart from the White House Projected Budget explains a lot to me.

First let me say tht it is rather terrifying - that so much is spent on the military and on the Homeland Security "needs."

This tells me one reason why Obama's Dept of Justice and DEA happen to be all over the medical marijuana iussue - if they don't find an actual project to use these funds on, people are going to start demanding that less money goes to the military and Homeland Security.

[inna]

3. Thank you, Always, David, with huge appreciation for your work! It's needed,

more than you can believe.

[slipslidingaway]

6. knr nt

[L0oniX]

9. ...and you wonder why I hate the military.

[bertman]

10. Great idea. Very informative. REC. nt