Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Payroll Tax is not the correct word to be using when it comes to SS contributions...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:36 AM
Original message
Payroll Tax is not the correct word to be using when it comes to SS contributions...
If you call it a tax, then you are mudding up the true nature of the payroll deduction to fund Social Security.

Even though the IRS calls it a tax, it is really a contribution because it goes into your FICA account to determine how much you will receive when you retire...

I know it sounds nit picking, but there it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's an important detail that folks need to understand...
Since it describes something we'll receive at retirement...

Thanks for clarifying!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. The problem is the payroll tax is used to make the assertion that people who don't pay income taxes
Still pay federal taxes.

This is the reason people do stress that it is a tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know that but it is a terminology trap...
The federal tax on gasoline is enough to say that those work and don't make enough money to pay tax still pay taxes on gasoline...

But here is a link that spells out import taxes and other hidden taxes we pay every day....

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/CutYourTaxes/HiddenTaxesYouPayEveryDay.aspx?vv=1100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The federal tax on gas goes to pay for roads. It's a users tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. FICA is a tax
There is no such thing as a "FICA account". FICA taxes go right into the general fund.

I think it's much more misleading when the Limpballs of the world say the poor don't pay "taxes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Close, but FICA does not go direct to the gen fund, it first is disbursed to OASDI and others.
2/3 of it goes into Social Security, the rest goes into medicare and unemployment insurance. The excess money for those programs is then used to purchase treasury bills (which is how it returns to the general fund).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And those T-bills are owned by the fund and are supposed to be sold to cover shortfalls
None of it actually belongs in the General fund, what ends up there is supposed to be a loan (or an investment so to speak) like any other t-bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. And your contributions to the fund are journalized by the SSA
and used to determine how much your benefit will be upon retirement.

Again, it is what it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. FICA goes directly into the general fund
That money goes to buy 'special issuances' which aren't really T-Bills, which is how money from the general fund is transferred to the SS trust fund. When benefits are to be paid, those securities are redeemed, the money goes back into the general fund, and is paid to recipients.

The point is there isn't a separate pot of money out there which holds FICA payments or SS disbursements. It all flows through the general fund by way of the SS trust fund. This made the accounting for the current FICA tax holiday pretty simple. The 2% FICA holiday that's currently in effect is being made up by the general fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. You forgot to mention the parts of FICA that go into the general fund. Some of it does go into the
general fund. It started with the Clinton presidency when he borrowed against the SS fund to help balance the budget. The money he borrowed was suppose to be payed back, but instead of paying back SS, Bush came into office and gave away the surplus from the general fund in the form of a tax rebate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not correct to say that the money "goes into your FICA account"
Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system. In general, money from current workers funds benefits to current retirees. (Because of the demographic bump of the Baby Boom, which messes up a pure pay-as-you-go plan, the system is now deliberately amassing a surplus, but that doesn't change its fundamental nature.)

For example, consider Lisa, who who earned $30,000 in some past year, that year being one of the 35 years that are taken into account in determining her level of benefit when she retires. None of the FICA tax she paid that year is in any reserved account for her. Instead, when she retires, her wages for that year will be adjusted to current value and then averaged in with the 34 others. That means that the boost to her Social Security benefit from that year's work depends on how much she earned but also when she earned it. A $30,000 salary in 1980 will contribute a lot more to your benefit than a $30,000 salary in 2008.

That's not because Lisa's tax money was put in an account (a lockbox?) in her name, and it earned interest. No, the effect on her initial Social Security benefit depends on the changes in wages since the year of the earning, not on what interest would have been earned on a T-bill or whatever.

I conclude that "tax" is the right word. On the other hand, part of FDR's plan was that there wouldn't be a higher income tax so that the government could pay benefits out of the general fund. Instead, there would be a separate, dedicated tax, to create a feeling of ownership and entitlement, to make it politically difficult for the Republicans to mess with it. In that spirit, it's certainly beneficial to remind people that the money was collected on the basis of a promise and that the promise ought to be kept. In that sense it's different from other taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, the amount you contribute determines how much you will
recieve...

Also, those reports you get every few years from the SSA spells out exactly how much you have put in the system by year.

So if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newblewtoo Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Your statement while
true should not be misconstrued to mean that the more you put in the more you get out like a straight investment.




Low-wage earners get three times the relative benefit as high-wage earners from Social Security
A study by the Congressional Budget Office indicated the Benefit-to-Tax Ratio for low-income workers was about 200 percent. For high-income workers, this ratio is about 60 percent. For middle-income workers, the ratio is about 100 percent.

Here is the study :
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/77xx/doc7705/12-15-Progressivity-SS.pdf



I point this out only because it is often used by the right wingnuts to debase the entire Social Security system as a redistribution scheme.

Additionally there are other offsets which limit the amount on can receive if they also have other pensions. Many state and federal workers find themselves subject to "windfall profit" limitations.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Essentially it is a redistribution scheme
Those who are at the top of the FICA tax scale pay more for the benefit they receive than those at the bottom.

I see nothing wrong with that, except for the fact that there is a SS cap on wages and no SS is paid on investment income. If SS is an obligation we have to poorer older Americans, everyone should be contributing to this obligation. There should be no wage cap, nor should their be an exclusion for income other than wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Sort of, but it's more like an insurance premium.
Those who pay in more get a larger benefit when they can make an insurance claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. So what happens to the money you put in if you die before retirement age?
Also there isn't a linear arrangement between what you pay vs what your benefit is. The more you pay over your lifetime, the less benefit you receive dollar for dollar. This is because of the bend points the SSA uses in the PIA formula.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/bendpoints.html

SS is really more of a taxpayer funded insurance plan, which means the premiums you pay are a tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. When they take the excess and spend it on weapons
it is a tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. It really doesn't matter where it goes, in my opinion....
Those taxes are designated for certain purposes, unlike most other taxes. If there was no designated purpose or if there was no taxes called "FICA" taxes, how long do you think Social Security or Medicare would last??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. Not nitpicking at all. Being careful of how we frame discussions...
...and the language used to craft arguments is essential. The Republicans are masters at this. We need to be so as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
18. The FICA tax is a tax
It doesn't go to an individual fund. The amount you receive in retirement is only loosely related to earnings, since only a limited number of quarters of earnings are used in the benefit computation. Non-working spouses can draw on the other spouses record, even after divorce, no matter how many marraiges they have had.

And part of FICA tax pays for widows, widower, dependents, and disability benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. What other things are you forced to contribute to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. SS taxes are insurance premiums. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. Will I go to jail if I don't pay it? Then it is a tax.
I won't go to jail for not contributing to charity. Those are contributions.

And if it is a contribution that those people who say 47% of people don't pay taxes are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC