Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

League of Women Voters Files Suit to Block WI's New Polling Place Photo ID Restriction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:45 PM
Original message
League of Women Voters Files Suit to Block WI's New Polling Place Photo ID Restriction
Source: BRAD BLOG, Reuters



BREAKING: League of Women Voters Files Suit to Block WI's New Polling Place Photo ID Restriction

Just in from Reuters...

The League of Women Voters sued on Thursday to block a new Wisconsin law requiring voters to present identification such as a drivers license at polling places, saying it would disenfranchise eligible voters.

The lawsuit, filed in Dane County Circuit Court, argues the state constitution allows only convicted felons and the mentally incompetent to be excluded from voting.

The new law creates a third class of people, those who do not have ID, said Andrea Kaminski, Wisconsin League of Women Voters Executive Director. Critics of the law say it would mainly affect minorities and the elderly, who may not have ID.


Not mentioned in the Reuters article is the effect the law is likely to have on student voters, as most WI student IDs have been disallowed for use as voting identification at the polling place, though some of those restrictions are being challenged via the WI Government Accountability Board (G.A.B.), the state's top election authority, who are interpreting the new measure.

Though the WI bill was jammed through the state legislature by the Republicans who control it and signed by Gov. Scott Walker (R) allows for voters to receive "free" Photo ID at state DMV offices, many of the state's office are infrequently open, and some voters have documented difficulties in obtaining the free IDs even where they were able to take time from work or school and find a way to get to the DMV to go through the tedious process.

In July we reported on the story of a new voter whose residency was challenged after DMV officials rifled through his bank statement to determine whether there had been enough "activity" in the bank account to assure his residency. We also reported in the same story that state officials had explicitly instructed DMV workers to not notify applicants that their ID would be given to them for free, unless they specifically asked for it for the express purpose of voting. Otherwise, a $28 fee would be assessed on top of any costs incurred by the applicant, such as purchasing a copy of their birth certificate or passport or making their way to the DMV.

Kristina Boardman, Director of WisDOT's Bureau of Field Services explained to The BRAD BLOG at the time that the reason they do not ask applicants if the ID is to be used for voting purposes is because "the statutory language specifically puts the onus on the customer for getting the ID for free for voting."

The frustrating experience of the hopeful voter at the DMV was documented in a video tape recorded during the process which we posted along with our story.

As we also detailed previously, a 2005 study by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee's Employment and Training Institute found that Democratic-leaning voters such as the elderly, ethnic minorities and college students are likely to be hit much harder by the new law than middle and upper-class white voters...

FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8858


Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8858
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent! Good thing the evil plot was exposed early enough to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Similar thread and unreced for blog flogging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "blog flogging"? Really?
Did you bother to read the article? Did you bother to see the additional information, background and context that was offered that was not available in the Reuters story?

But yes, by all means, do your best to make sure *fewer* people read this story. Sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes flogging and a dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "A dupe" of what?! I wrote the dang story for cripes sake!
Good lord...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. See posts 2 and 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. So unnecessary to begin with.
My name is in the Book and my prior signatures for comparison.

The vetting process is when you apply to be registered to vote, not when you cast it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarwinCares Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Haven't I seen this somewhere before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC