Is the National Security Complex Too Big to Fail?

[Donnachaidh]

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/10/20-2

Think of Iraq as the AIG of wars -- the only difference being that the bailout there didn’t involve just three payouts. More than eight years after the Bush administration invaded that country, the bailout is, unbelievably enough, still going. Even as the U.S. military withdraws, the State Department is planning to spend billions more in taxpayer dollars to field an army of hired-gun contractors to replace it. Afghanistan? It could have been the Lehman Brothers of conflicts, but when Barack Obama entered the Oval Office he chose the Citigroup model instead, and surged troops in twice in 2009. In other words, he double-TARPed that war, and ever since, the bailout money has been flooding in.

Until now -- as the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations make clear -- “too big to fail” has meant only one set of institutions: the plundering financial outfits that played such a role in driving the U.S. economy off a cliff in 2008, looked like they might themselves collapse in a heap of bad deals and indebtedness, and were bailed out by Washington. Isn’t it finally time to expand the too-big-to-fail category to include the Pentagon, the U.S. Intelligence Community, and more generally the National Security Complex?

There is, of course, one major difference between those bailed-out financial institutions and the Complex: however powerful the banks may be, however much money financial outfits and Wall Street sink into K-Street lobbyists and the election campaigns of politicians, however much influence the U.S. Chamber of Commerce may wield, when too-big-to-fail financial institutions totter, they have to come to the federal government hat (and future bonuses) in hand.

For the Pentagon and the National Security Complex, it’s quite another matter. These days it’s only a slight exaggeration to claim that they are Washington and that their very size, influence, and power protects them from the consequences of failure.

More at the link --

[dkf]

1. I'm beginning to wonder if there isnt some version of TBTF PNAC version.

Look at where our adventuring seems to be leading us...Libya, next Syria?

Why would Obama be following this track?

[ThomWV]

2. What an odd question - its too big to succeed, that's the problem.

[PETRUS]

3. The National Security Complex is a (violent) policy arm of the 1%

Bombing a clear path for profit seekers, snuffing out independent and alternative economies.

[hifiguy]

4. +1

Bomb them first, then impose The Shock Doctrine of Milton Friedman's plutocratic/crony capitalism.

[FarCenter]

5. The Naitonal Security Complex is the largest socialist enterprise in the world

Although parts of it may be privately owned, the military industrial complex is integrated with the government on many levels, from cost plus contracts to the revolving door between the Pentagon and the boardroom.