Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Class War Has Begun" By Frank Rich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 09:41 AM
Original message
"The Class War Has Begun" By Frank Rich
The Class War Has Begun
And the very classlessness of our society makes the conflict more volatile, not less.

By Frank Rich

.................

Politicians in either party, of course, never use the term “class warfare” to describe what’s going on in America, unless it’s Republican leaders accusing Obama of waging it every time he even mildly asserts timeless liberal bromides about taxing the rich. Nor do most politicians want to talk about the depth of the crisis in present-day capitalism, since to acknowledge its scale would only dramatize how little they intend to do about it.

The whole system is screwed up, and it’s not all Wall Street’s fault—or remotely in the financial sector’s power alone to solve. As middle-class Americans have lost their jobs or watched their wages stagnate or decline while corporations pile up record profits, they’ve also seen CEOs far removed from Wall Street (at Hewlett-Packard and Yahoo most recently) walk away with rich settlements even after they’ve laid off workers en masse, mismanaged their companies, or wrecked them. But at least politicians pay lip service to the woes of the middle class. That America’s poverty rate has risen to its highest level since 1993 goes all but unmentioned by leaders in both parties. The poor, after all, don’t make campaign contributions and are unlikely to vote. And they have even less clout than usual now that Republican legislators and governors, fanning bogus fears of “voter fraud,” have mandated new, Jim Crow–style restrictions to scare away poor, elderly, and minority voters in fourteen states. In the Beltway bubble, even the local poor are out of sight and out of mind; with a 6.1 percent unemployment rate and a median income of $84,523 (versus $50,046 nationally), Washington is now the wealthiest metro area in the country and, according to Gallup, departs from all 50 states in believing by a majority that the economy is getting better.

................

Elections are supposed to resolve conflicts in a great democracy, but our next one will not. The elites will face off against the elites to a standoff, and the issues animating the class war in both parties won’t even be on the table. The structural crises in our economy, our government, and our culture defy any of the glib solutions proposed by current Democrats or Republicans; the quixotic third-party movements being hatched by well-heeled do-gooders are vanity productions. The two powerful forces that extricated America from the Great Depression—the courageous leadership and reformist zeal of Roosevelt, the mobilization for World War II—are not on offer this time. Our class war will rage on without winners indefinitely, with all sides stewing in their own juices, until—when? No one knows. The reckoning with capitalism’s failures over the past three decades, both in America and the globe beyond, may well be on hold until the top one percent becomes persuaded that its own economic fate is tied to the other 99 percent’s. Which is to say things may have to get worse before they get better.

Over the short term, meanwhile, the Democratic Establishment is no doubt wishing that Occupy Wall Street will melt away with the winter snows, much as its Republican counterpart hopes that the leaderless tea party will wither if Romney nails down the nomination. But even in the unlikely event that these wishes come true, it is not likely to be the end of the story. Though the Bonus Army was driven out of Washington in the similarly fraught election year of 1932, the newsreels they left behind turned out to be previews of coming attractions for the long decade still to come.

MORE: (5 pages)
http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/class-war-2011-10/index4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. My local RW fishwrap is doubling-down on OWS-bashing
Just today, the op-ed page was chock-a-block with cartoons, editorials & LTTEs all bashing the OWS movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. they are somewhere between the mocking
and fighting stages. I don't think they really know HOW to fight ows yet though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newspaper Boy Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. But we're a classless society!!!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Frank Rich FAIL - right wing talking points: dems = repukes, dems afraid of ows NOT
So now Frank Rich has gone all Michael Moore trying to catch the OWS wave?

Things would be much better if we had a Democrats in control and if all this leads to is a lot of pie in the sky we won't be much better off for the next decade and might have to deal with Romney as our "commander in chief".

The right will do what they can to sow the seeds of apathy towards voting.

I also do not agree Democrats want OWS to melt away. The unions support it.

So, this article is right wing FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I disagree. Most elected Dems are beholden to the money just like Repubs.
That's why OWS exists. Because the whole damn system needs to change. The unions are not the elected Dems. The people are not the elected Dems. The elected Dems need money flowing into their campaigns and that money comes from big business and they expect something for it. And for the most part they get it.

OWS is not a Democratic Party movement. It is a people's movement against the way the system currently operates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Beholden to $ yes. It will take decades to change the system
in the meantime only a low info citizen would equate the dems and repukes.

"Anarchist" principles sound nice on paper but we'll see how much of that suits the majority in the USA.

Voting still matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, real change does not always come slowly.
In fact, some of the most important changes in history have happened rapidly, when the people and a strong leader seized a moment. Emancipation happened with the stroke of a pen. The Civil Rights Act issued in massive changes and social revolution. The Berlin Wall came down rapidly. The Patriot Act also caused rapid, devastating changes to our country. The banks and corporations have the power they have now, only because we have enabled that. We can un-enable it any time we choose. We put these people in office. They are not there for any other reason.

Do not tell us that we need to wait decades for change.

What we have been doing is not working. We voted in a Democratic President and both houses of Congress, and we have continued to move rightward. Not only that, but the talking points for free trade agreements, expansion of war into new countries, and slashing of social safety nets are now considered BIPARTISAN.

People would not be in the streets protesting, if they felt they had real hope of change from current inhabitants of Congress and the White House. No, change does not have to take decades, and it will not materialize if we keep doing what we have been doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Sorry it's naive to think they can change our system like the Arab spring etc
this movement is just over a month old plz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I like your attitude! When do we want it? NOW!!!
You must believe it in order to achieve it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. People are forgetting that OWS is a reaction to globalization
... it's not like the issues started yesterday and they won't be solved overnight.

Without a third party the choice will remain the same. OWS will push the dems a bit left.

Over time a lot could happen but they don't have that much time to prove themselves. It
can't continue to be amorphous and accomplish things within the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I don't think it's anarchy that is desired, it's the opposite, the construction of laws.
I forget who said it that way... I think I saw it on a video clip.

But OWS is asking for regulation and taxation, not the dissolution of government.

And so far... voting still matters, as long as election fraud is kept in check, but it's getting to the point where if you have to choose between bad and worse you have to know that the methods of running candidates has to change. Right now there is no way in hell TPTB would allow a real progressive into any meaningful race. And that is unacceptable. So we have to have real campaign finance reform and get rid of the professional lobbyists etc... get money out of politics. That's not anarchy at all, just retooling the system so that it isn't gamed by big money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's about it, I agree
even though they are following anarchist principles in terms of direct democracy -- let's hope they can include all philosophies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Beholden maybe, sold out? no....I do believe there's a difference between the 2 parties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good point. Beholden describes the rethugs as they kiss Koch ass
and Romney gets 6x more wall st. $ than Obama as is reported
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. This is why I am suspicious of all this claim to speak for 99%: Corporate Dems think
protesters are supporting THEM in OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They will continue to push this meme.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 02:29 PM by woo me with science
"Stay the course." Where have we heard THAT before? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Please
people worked for emancipation since the birth of our country, and it took a civil war, it was not 'overnight'. Civil rights as well took decades of fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Do you really think you can get away with labeling and smearing progressives as right-wingers on DU?

Do you think we and OWS participants are fricken stupid and don't understand you are engaging in that smear tactic in order to discourage democratic debate and open discussion on Democratic Underground?

Spread that swift-boat like bull shit somewhere else.

Not here.

This is not a trash talk board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. I think he means "establishment" Dems
Some running for political office are going to start asking for donations pretty soon. Probably one of the few things the parties had in common was that they both received money from corporations...Wall Street included. Perhaps, they think it will be hard to ask for a handout and slap them with the same hand. Only the middle class allows that kind of disrespect. Maybe OWS has support of non "establishment" Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Where ya been Frankie? It started when Reagan got in the White House
and has never let up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's what I was thinking too. Well said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. + 2
Frankie and his old employer missed every opportunity to cover the "greatest transfers of wealth in human history" every time it's happened...Trickle Down Economics, S&L bailout, Wall Street Bailout, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. My read of the tea leaves is different
Mr. Rich does not see the endgame. It will resolve far more quickly than he imagines. Once the elite get a good sense of what the people will actually stand up for, they will appear to fold like a house of cards. Accomodations will be made. The new deal was such an accomodation. It did not do enough to solve all the problems, but it took the sharp edge off of them.

More money is made from a better paid and passive workforce. The one percent will learn again to live within their tolerable limits taking a slice off the top each year. They will still get to be very rich, just not as quickly. Everyone else will do a bit better.

My guess politically is that the republicans finally get taken to the woodshed and come back a very different critter. Rockefeller republicans came from their last trip to the woodshed during the FDR administration. When we get down to 16 republicans left in the Senate, they will take the lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. My read of the tea leaves is different
Mr. Rich does not see the endgame. It will resolve far more quickly than he imagines. Once the elite get a good sense of what the people will actually stand up for, they will appear to fold like a house of cards. Accomodations will be made. The new deal was such an accomodation. It did not do enough to solve all the problems, but it took the sharp edge off of them.

More money is made from a better paid and passive workforce. The one percent will learn again to live within their tolerable limits taking a slice off the top each year. They will still get to be very rich, just not as quickly. Everyone else will do a bit better.

My guess politically is that the republicans finally get taken to the woodshed and come back a very different critter. Rockefeller republicans came from their last trip to the woodshed during the FDR administration. When we get down to 16 republicans left in the Senate, they will take the lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. they've been to the woodshed before ... 80 years later, they're playing the same game
... that got them sent to the woodshed in the first place. No, they won't EVER change.
They may go into hibernation or 'change their message' until people forget, but their ultimate goals will ALWAYS be the same.
History has proven thus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It is that history repeats itself
which makes the study of it interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. It hasn't begun, it's just not a one-sided fight anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. too late to Rec, but here's a Tuesday afternoon kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. This headline needs to be phrased Yoda style: "Begun, the class war has."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC