Um... I... Uh... Photoshopped ??? - I Guess ???

[WillyT]

:wtf:

Link: http://yfrog.com/h3dnfuej

:shrug:

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

1. And yet he's still smiling. I gotta gotta give it to him. But, now the douche nozzles at PBS

will probably ask him to resign. :+





.

[gratuitous]

2. Clearly a photoshop

The cop on the right wouldn't be just standing there, he'd have his size 10 on the back of Elmo's neck, and that goofy grin would be wiped the hell off his dirty fucking hippie face.

[WillyT]

4. Ok... But What's Really Going On There ???

Are they getting sandwiches out of their Elmo ice-chest???

:shrug:

:hi:

[nadinbrzezinski]

5. Occupy sesame street

http://www.dailytexanonline.com/life-and-arts/2011/10/18/occupysesamestreet-more-just-meme

Plenty on the google. Yes even yellow bird is part of the 99%

[smokey nj]

8. Big Bird, not Yellow Bird.

[Recovered Repug]

9. It was really Oscar the Grouch that got arrested.

Anyone who lives in a trash can is clearly in the 99%. Being a grouch made him an easy target for arrest.

[Rex]

3. Hmmm...white shirt involved, so yeah they probably arrested

Elmo. Why not?

[Poll_Blind]

6. LOL- good fodder for http://errorlevelanalysis.com:

Just paste the URL for a JPG into the "Submit an image url for error level analysis: " field at http://errorlevelanalysis.com/">ErrorLevelAnalysis, hit the "Process" button and you're http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/6795068/">good to go.

Heh heh, a 'shop job! Notice how much brighter the portion of the photo which contains the muppet is than the rest of the image?

Not hard to guess in this case, of course. But the site can be handy if you come across an image which you think may have been doctored. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis">Error level analysis is not foolproof. Not foolproof at all. But it's one in a bag of tools you can use to help determine whether or not a digital scene has been embellished.

Silly example, useful tool.

PB

[Liberal_in_LA]

7. lol. Poor Elmo