Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Modern World - "Suck it Up, Whiners!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:22 AM
Original message
This Modern World - "Suck it Up, Whiners!"
http://www.credoaction.com/comics/2011/10/



Well, problem solved, I guess . . .

The sad thing is, people who think like this will go "WHAT? Those two anchors are right!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. ''If it's on the tee vee, it must be true.''
Overheard several times over the course of my 54 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And "Tee Vee" has been a useful tool of the right during that time.
Even during a time when we supposedly had an "objective" Fourth Estate. I put that in quotes because even back in the 70s-80s, they still didn't take corporations to task very much.

We now know, thanks to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the brutal price of not paying attention to evil's chicanery. No "objective" to be found, and now we have two fully operational and unabashed propaganda arms of the RNC (Faux, CNBC) and another willfully stepping into the abyss (CNN).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Capital Cities ABC is also nice.


Mumbles Casey got mad whenever his beloved GOP got lousy press, so he went on a tear and his "old company," Capital Cities, decided to buy their own network, ABC. And to make things worse, they hired a NAZI gasbag greedhead to spearhead the hate.



ABC and the rise of Rush Limbaugh

EXCERPT...

Capital Cities was born in 1954, and rapidly prospered. Many of its founders had previously worked in the U.S. intelligence community and had a great amount of wealth, social contacts and influence in government. Yet they opted to keep the company's actions out of the public eye -- they did not flaunt their wealth with private planes and lavish offices the way so many successful companies do. Just exactly how well-connected Capital Cities was to the CIA is unknown, but it is clear that the CIA concerned itself with the company at various times. The fact that the CIA has often used private businessmen, journalists and even entire companies as fronts for covert operations is not only well-known by historians, but legendary. (Recall Howard Hughes and Trans-World Airlines...)

One of Capital City's early founders was William Casey, who would later become Ronald Reagan's Director of the CIA. At the time of Casey's nomination, the press expressed surprise that Reagan would hire a businessman whose last-known intelligence experience was limited to OSS operations in World War II. The fact is, however, that Casey had never left intelligence. Throughout the Cold War he kept a foot in both worlds, in private business as well as the CIA. A history of Casey's business dealings reveals that he was an aggressive player who saw nothing wrong with bending the law to further his own conservative agenda. When he became implicated as a central figure in the Iran-Contra scandal, many Washington insiders considered it a predictable continuation of a very shady career.

Another Capital Cities founder, Lowell Thomas, was a close friend and business contact with Allen Dulles, Eisenhower's CIA Director, and John Dulles, the Secretary of State. Thomas always denied being a spy, but he was frequently seen at events involving intelligence operations. Another founder was Thomas Dewey, whom the CIA had given millions to create other front companies for covert operations.

Capital Cities prospered from the start; its specialty was to buy media organizations that were in trouble. Upon acquisition, it would improve management and eliminate waste until the company started turning a profit. This no-nonsense, no-frills approach, as well as its refusal to become side-tracked with other ventures, made it one of the most successful media conglomerates of the 60s and 70s. Of course, the journalistic slant of its companies was decidedly conservative and anticommunist. To anyone who believes that the government should not control the press, the possibility that the CIA created a media company to dispense conservative and Cold War propaganda should be alarming. Rush Limbaugh himself calls freedom of the press "the sweetest -- and most American -- words you will ever find." (2) Apparently, he is unaware of the history of his own employers.

By the 1980s, Capital Cities had grown powerful enough that it was now poised to hunt truly big game: a major television network. A vulnerable target appeared in the form of ABC, whose poor management in the early 80s was driving both its profits and stocks into oblivion. Back then, ABC's journalistic slant was indeed liberal; its criticism of the Reagan Administration had drawn the wrath of conservatives everywhere, from Wall Street to Washington. This was in marked contrast to the rest of the White House press corps, which was, in Bagdikian's words, "stunningly uncritical" of Reagan. Behind the scenes, Reagan was deregulating the FCC and eliminating anti-monopoly laws for the media, a fact the media appreciated and rewarded. The only exception was ABC. Sam Donaldson's penetrating questions during press conferences were so embarrassing to Reagan that his handlers scheduled the fewest Presidential press conferences in modern history.

CONTINUED...

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-libmedia.htm





Disney has since bought up said gasbags. Now they're just full of love of war and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "But, But, But . . . ain't that thur ABC a Lib'Rul channel?"
And neither is CBS . . .

In parts, it reads like a political thriller, with a cast of "right-wing" hit men out to force a powerful journalist to heel. Or a tale of corporate deceit, in which Machiavellian suits sacrifice their own to cozy up to the president of the United States. Or a behind-the-scenes saga of a network news division assembling a story that could help unseat an incumbent president at the polls.

In fact, the 32-page document is former CBS anchor Dan Rather's stunning, $70 million lawsuit filed yesterday against the network, its corporate owners and his bosses stemming from "Memogate," the flawed three-year-old report on the nearly four-decade-old military record of President George W. Bush—an account that blackened the eye of CBS News and apparently hastened the end of Rather's 44-year career at the network.

In dropping the legal bombshell, Rather, 75, alleges that CBS and his former bosses "coerced" him into apologizing for a controversial story in which his role was little more than that of a narrator. Two months after the broadcast, he was bounced from the anchor desk, two years earlier than originally planned. Rather also maintains that he was subsequently marginalized in his new full-time job at "60 Minutes," robbed of airtime and shortchanged on staffing. And although he was found largely blameless, Rather contends that a CBS-commissioned probe of the story was "biased," asserting in the suit that the investigation reached "conclusions that were preordained to find fault with the broadcast and those persons responsible for it."

There was a motive, he argues, for this "egregious conduct toward him." He was being made the "scapegoat" by, among others, CBS executive chairman Sumner Redstone and CBS chief executive Leslie Moonves. Their motives were "to pacify the White House," "appease angry government officials" or "to curry favor with the Bush administration" as a means of advancing the corporate interest of CBS owner Viacom. In addition, Moonves's "wrongful acts" partly reflected unspecified "personal interests." Among other things, Rather contends, the acts constituted a "breach of contract, fraud … and interference with prospective economic advantage." He asserts that he suffered "significant financial loss" and serious damage to his reputation. The suit appears designed to burnish his image and recover his financial losses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Shameless kick. It's Tom Tomorrow, damn it.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. KICK! No get . . . why do other TMWs stay up but when I post one, it sinks like a stone?
This is a good one also. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick. I don't know what else to do here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. In all seriousness, a wifi device is very important to a lot of people on the edge....
Yes, it's a miracle of modern technology. But it let's you stay in touch with family, friends, and the world, for free, sitting behind most coffee shops. And selling it won't make a dent in anyone's long-term financial future. So when I see some homeless person hiding that beat-up netbook, I don't think he's not poor. I think he's smart poor.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC