—By Adam Weinstein|
As right-wing pundits decry the end of one US war and the conduct of another, they'd do well to consider the case of Sgt. 1st Class Kristoffer Bryan Domeij. The 10-year veteran of the elite Army Rangers was killed, along with two of his comrades, in an IED attack in Afghanistan on October 22. But Domeij's situation was special: He perished on his 14th war deployment since 2002.
Domeij's commanding officer, Col. Mark Odom, called him "the prototypical special operations" leader whose special skills—he was one of the first soldiers qualified to coordinate Air Force and Navy air attacks from his ground position—made him a hot commodity in the war zones. Domeij, he said, was a "veteran of a decade of deployments to both Iraq and Afghanistan and hundreds of combat missions."
Besides being loved by his colleagues, the San Diego-born Domeij was also (PDF) the married father of two daughters. Assuming an average deployment length of seven months—Army deployments are seldom shorter than that, and usually much longer—he probably spent at least 8 of his 29 years overseas, waging America's wars.
It's easy to make too much of a case like this; Domeij, after all, was a voluntary soldier, and a member of an elite special operations community whose motto is "Rangers lead the way." But a fit young person's willingness to serve his country is not the point; the point is whether this country is abusing its fit young peoples' sense of commitment. It's amazing (and encouraging) that, for all its shortcomings and divisions, the United States still has a supply of dedicated public servants. It's also amazing that we could exhaust our supply so dramatically that we could ask a man to spend nearly one-third of his brief life at war.
more
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/10/army-ranger-dies-14th-war-deployment