Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tulsa Woman Arrested for Gawking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:35 PM
Original message
Tulsa Woman Arrested for Gawking
She saw a car stuck in a tree following an accident and stopped to take pictures.

I suspect there were lots of people there gawking.

I also suspect that there was a cop on duty with an attitude.

http://www.newson6.com/story/15863014/tulsa-woman-arrested-for-gawking-at-accident-scene
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. police have quotas to meet or no promotions nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just gawking
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:43 PM by dipsydoodle
or gawking without a licence ?

'cuse me Madam . Do 'ave a permit to gawk ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. He didn't want to get caught behaving untowardly. Also...
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:47 PM by Sarah Ibarruri

"She was booked on two misdemeanor complaints: obstruction and resisting arrest."

Obstruction of what?

As for resisting arrest, cops bully people, then arrest them for 'resisting arrest.' That has to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. possibly, obstructing the emergency personnel from dealing with the accident
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:49 PM by MH1
I think in this situation they have a right to tell people to leave, they have a job to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They do. If that was the case, they needed to tell her to step away nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. according to the article she was asked to leave more than once, and refused
Based on the article, I see the cops' position on this. She could have been endangering others and if they asked her to leave she should have just gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Ummmm......
She was parked off the highway. And she was not asked to leave until she could not produce the press credentials she falsely claimed to have. The woman in question used to be a photojournalist and is a local blogger.

I suspect there is a lot more to this story than is being reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. You're assuming that the request to leave was a reasonable one.
It may not have been. The fact that a cop gets antsy about something is not sufficient reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. She pulled over on the interstate to take
pictures of a crash scene. Blocking access to rescue personnel and the like could make for a pretty dangerous situation and at the very least causing even more of a delay trying to get by/to the accident scene.

Personally I think that rubbernecking should be a hanging offense but I've had to drive on the Cross Bronx Expressway a lot in the last few months and have learned to despise people that slow down to get a better view of an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Precisely. No sympathy from me--she'd have been better off taking pics out the window. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think more rubberneckers SHOULD be ticketed at least
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:52 PM by dmallind
People slowing down suddenly to a 5mph crawl to look at a wreck as if they have never seen a damaged car and a cop vehicle before risk our safety and add greatly to congestion. This woman stopped and got out on an interstate. Besides - if you were involved in a serious crash, would you want some prurient nosy cow taking pictures of you to gloat over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. To be fair, I slow down at wrecks, because it's a potentially hazardous scene--
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 04:03 PM by TwilightGardener
emergency vehicles, people on foot, possible confusion, pieces of wreckage, etc. I am not going to zip by at the usual speed, even if there was no traffic slowdown at the scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. slowing down to a prudent speed is fine - when it's on your side of the highway at least
But all too often it's people slowing to a crawl to stare at something on the other side of a concrete divider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. She lied about being attached to AP.
She parked on the shoulder, possible blocking the movement of other emergency vehicles.

She could have moved on when asked to and parked elsewhere, as other photographers did, but she refused to do so.

That stretch of I-44 is a dangerous stretch through Tulsa, she was adding to the danger.

She sounds like a real piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. She was an idiot. She lied to the cops, then didn't obey their lawful order to clear the scene for
emergency response vehicles.

She was stupid.

Tulsan Mary Bradshaw says she was stuck in traffic on I-44 when she saw a car dangling from a tree. The arrest report says troopers saw Bradshaw pull over and start taking pictures. When troopers questioned her, she claimed to work for the Associated Press.

She doesn't have credentials, so troopers asked her several times to leave, the report states. Bradshaw refused, and a trooper handcuffed her and took her to jail. She was booked on two misdemeanor complaints: obstruction and resisting arrest....


She would have been OK if she hadn't decided to ignore the cop while they were trying to manage the accident scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds dumb, but makes sense ...
Lots of accidents occur because of people becoming distracted by the accident, and the vehicles around it.

I saw such an accident first hand.

I was directly behind and accident, and barely avoided it. I got out and helped one driver, and another guy went to help the other driver.

He and I controlled traffic until police and medical folks arrived. This was dangerous. The drivers passing by were distracted big time.

After the police came, he and I were able to "step off" ... the authorities took over.

And then I watched as a cop walked directly into traffic and held his hand up to stop the cars.

Car #1 stopped because the COP was standing in the rode. Car #2 was watching all the activity and did not stop. Car #3 was also distracted and did not stop.

Bang bang bang. The car that stopped is rear-ended by car#2, and car #3 rear ends car#2. The Cop was ok.

You NEVER stop traffic on an interstate. You NEVER get out of your car in an Interstate unless your car DIED.

And you NEVER stop your car at an accident and take pictures on an interstate, unless you want to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The woman
did not stop on the highway. She pulled off on the shoulder of the road. She was not impeding traffic nor was she interferring with rescue efforts.

I know someone who lives nearby and who was returning home from Oktoberfest and observed these events. According to witnesses at the scene the real offense was being mouthy to a cop. Apparently thw woman was not asked to move or leave until she could not produce press credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. The shoulder is part of the highway .... lots of folks get killed ...
on the shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here
you are allowed to park (or abandon) your car on the shoulder of the highway and it is not to be towed for at least 24 hours.

Drivers here are familiar with and expect parked and unoccupied vehicles on the shoulder of the highway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. My father died when his car hit a car on the shoulder, so this is personal.
You do NOT stop on the shoulder to take pictures.

You stop on the shoulder because you have a critical automotive issue.

People who stop on the shoulder for any other reason deserve a ticket.

And your claim that "Drivers here are familiar with and expect parked and unoccupied vehicles on the shoulder of the highway" is incredible stupid because it assumes that all drives on that road are ""Drivers here" ... very dumb. You can not assume that all the drivers on ANY road fall into your category of ... ""Drivers here".

Very myopic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I'm sorry about your father
but the law here permits drivers to leave their cars on the shoulder of the highway for up to 24 hours. If a vehicle remains abandoed for more than 24 hours it is tagged and then towed. There are no tickets issued because no law has been violated.

If a driver hits a vehicle that is abandoned on the shoulder of the road here they will be ticketed. Why? Because hitting a vehicle parked on the shoulder of the road requires the driver to leave the road and all designated lanes of travel. Unless they are taking evasive action that is viewed as losing control of one's vehicle.

While it may not be a good idea to park on the shoulder of the road it is not illegal. It is a common practice here which drivers are familiar with and can reasonably expect. Drive the highways here on any given day you will encounter many cars abandoned on the shoulder of the highway.

I would imagine that like most places the vast majority of drivers here reside here. This certainly is no tourist mecca. Any non-resident driver ought to expect that many laws and practices differ from those in the jurisdiction where he resides.

Whether parking on the shoulder of the road promotes driver safety is a very dfferent issue from whether doing so is legal and regularly practiced in the area.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. she didnt have credentials and asked a number of times to leave.
probably a traffic mess and probably didnt want to have to be concerned about her safety either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Did they include a picture too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. ABNER! ABNER!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. The charges don't make total sense to me at this time
Obstruction and resisting arrest comes from them asking her to leave, but can they?

This question comes up in movie making, where the movie maker tries to tell people they must leave a public place.

What authority is there for a cop just telling you to leave and that's against the law? Or a movie maker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nothing to see here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. Credentials?!?! Total nonsense
The government can not give or remove access to public spaces based on whether they recognize "press credentials". This is seriously anti-constitutional and pisses me the hell off that any progressive would think press credentials should have any bearing whatsoever on how the police act.

Now, past my rant it is totally appropriate for a police officer at the scene of an accident (or crime) to take charge of the scene for the safety of others and preservation of evidence. But press should not get a pass, but if they do, they must allow all press and by all press, that means everyone who claims to be reporting.

If you let the government decide which people are reporters, you gut freedom of the press. Freedom of speech is NOT just for reporters, it is a right all Americans inately enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC