Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rochester, N.Y. Board of Education OKs corporate superindentant search

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:15 AM
Original message
Rochester, N.Y. Board of Education OKs corporate superindentant search
Hours before the city school board publicly approved a resolution allowing it to enter into a contract with a superintendent search firm, a posting for the job appeared on the company's website.

The posting on the Ray and Associates Inc. site at least three hours before Thursday night's board meeting raised questions among open government advocates, who said the premature posting seemed to indicate the board had made a decision before conducting a public vote, as it is required to do by law.Ray and Associates is an

Iowa-based search firm whose website boasts relationships with the Urban Superintendents of America, the Council of Great City Schools, Association of Latino Administrators and Superintendents and the Broad Urban Superintendents Academy, which is often criticized for what some see as an agenda that puts power over schools in the hands of corporations.

The board was scheduled to vote on the resolution at a special meeting earlier this month, but tabled the plan after dozens of community members turned out to protest and raised concerns that the board did not give proper notice of the meeting under the law. While the board sent out a notice of the meeting several days beforehand, it did not post what resolutions would be voted on until the day of the meeting.

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20111028/NEWS01/110280315/School-board-OKs-search-contract?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Home|s

This was tabled after an outpouring of community dissent last week. Last night's meeting did not feature the topic on the agenda, possibly an effort to prevent community protest groups from attending, and was brought to vote in the last minutes of last night's meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds to me like the whole bastard lot of them were paid off for an outcome.
They should all be sacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. sounds like a bait and switch to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC