Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rick Perry protests "intellectual" analysis of his jobs plan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:45 PM
Original message
Rick Perry protests "intellectual" analysis of his jobs plan.
Edited on Sun Oct-30-11 11:47 PM by woo me with science
Background: Fox News Sunday. Chris Wallace runs a video clip of a Rick Perry campaign ad that promises 2.5 million new jobs. Then this absolutely perfect conversation ensues:


(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, PERRY CAMPAIGN AD)

PERRY: As president, I'll create at least 2.5 million new jobs, and I know something about that.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

.....(snip)....

WALLACE: But how do you answer this question. Two and half million doesn't keep pace with the population growth. We would -- our unemployment rate would increase under this goal?

PERRY: I don't believe that for a minute. That is just absolutely false on its face. Americans will get back to work. Are we going to go out and make some, you know, claim and say, oh, it's going to create 10.5 million jobs? We would be having the same conversation. Oh, that's not realistic.

I will tell you one thing. You give this plan a chance. You put Americans where they know that they can pay their income tax on a postcard, that they're going to have those kind of cuts, that they're going to have a balanced budget amendment to the United States Constitution in four years and they will go back to work. Manufacturing jobs will come back to this country.

The idea that I'm going to let people talk this plan down for the sake of just having an intellectual discussion is not correct.



:wow: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:puke: :nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Perry blocked one too many field goals with his head..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure did! No intelekshul there!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. He was a cheerleader
A 'yell leader' so he never got dropped on his head.

He's just a whole lot of stupid normally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. another Texas Cheerleader!!?
After Dim Son at Yale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. He's an Aggie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Perry interview
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 12:26 AM by Tx4obama

Found this link but it's 26 minutes long ;(

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1249929139001/rick-perry-reboots-presidential-campaign/

p.s. Maybe FoxNews doesn't post 'short' videos of the 'crazy' stuff ;)


Edited to add: The part of the video referenced in the OP starts at the 15:30 minute mark.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because haviang an intellectual discussion
is necessary in considering any major economic proposal?

I guess Perry is saying we should just take his plan on blind faith. Pray that it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. and we have a winner ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Conservatives aren't good with facts or numbers...especially dumb ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. LOL
when the truly dumb try tossing red meat to their dumb supporters - :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. There is another lie in there.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 12:41 AM by Tx4obama
At the 18:20 minute mark, Perry says he is the Commander-in-Chief of 20,000 Texas National Guard troops.
Governor's are not the Commanders of National Guard troops.
Palin tried to pull that same talking point in the past and it didn't work for her either.

Edited to add
And at the 20:00 minute mark he says: * subsadation * - that is NOT a word.
He might have been thinking 'subsidization'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. What I don't get is
Why, when they mention how many jobs they created as governor/senator/representative, or talk about how many jobs their employment plans are going to create, someone doesn't have the brains/balls to say, "But governor/senator... I thought government didn't create jobs?"

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marazinia Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. The idea that I'm going to let people talk this plan down...
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 12:54 AM by Marazinia
just having an intellectual discussion is not correct.


I'm going to use this one every chance I get just to see the expression on people's faces!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. If he didn't want to have an "intellectual discussion"
he never should have appeared on that hot bed of intellectualism, the Fox News(?) Channel, or talked to that well known intellectual Chris Wallass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. This has to be the funniest thing I have read
in a long time. Sadly it will probably get him more votes.

Don't think about it, just believe! :banghead: :rofl: <--------really, I can't choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. My God, what a fool.
I have never seen a group of people dumber than these pathetic republican "candidates". Watching them is like watching the primate cage at the zoo: it's entertaining, but at some point you have to move on. But not yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Rick Perry is an ass and not qualified to be dog catcher. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. omg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. he makes juni*r look like a rhodes scholar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. Them damn thinkers; they hurt ya ev'ry time
Rick Perry is a litmus test for the breaking point of reality.

Yes, it's been an effective ploy since the beginning of the republic to scoff at the high-toned thinky types, but that tack can only go so far. Perhaps we owe it to him to find the cut-off point. Sadly, though, that theory is premised upon anyone in the establishment "non-right" actually standing up and fighting for anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. The numbers have a liberal bias!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC