Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grovel Nerdquist is at it again: Re: Reagan on Mount Rushmore.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 11:50 AM
Original message
Grovel Nerdquist is at it again: Re: Reagan on Mount Rushmore.
The Most Questionably Important Bastard Yard Gnome In History wants something to masturbate to when he visits South Dakota:

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/room-another-bust-70-old-mt-rushmore-114030180.html

Given their way, some conservatives would jump at any chance to round out South Dakota’s iconic Mt. Rushmore with their hero 40th president, Ronald Reagan.

“Reagan was the most successful president of the 20th century,” Reagan Legacy Project Chairman Grover Norquist told Devin Dwyer of ABC News earlier this year. “He took a country that was in economic collapse and military in retreat round the globe and turned it completely around.

Congress rejected the notion 12 years ago but the monument’s 70th birthday today is a reminder that the monument of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt is incomplete with or without another face: The sculptor died before finishing Washington’s waist and coat, and Lincoln’s hands, according to the Rapid City, S.D., tourism website.

Here are some other things you might not know about the memorial to U.S. history:

* The project took 14 years and cost about $1 million;

* The carvings are scaled to people who would be 465 feet tall;

* Each head is 6 stories tall;

* The carvings displaced 800 million pounds of stone;

* The noses are 20 feet long;

* The workers climbed 506 steps each day.

Sculptor Gutzon Borglum, who started the project at age 60, died unexpectedly seven months before the project was declared complete Oct. 31, 1941, built on his desire to “show posterity what manner of men they were. Then breathe a prayer that these records will endure until the wind and the rain alone shall wear them away.”


:wow:

Who listens to this dumbshit for anything but comedy? Why is he not in JAIL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe on the back, with a six-story asscrack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, bub ... some Republican made a bet in 1994 ...
and he has yet to get Clinton's face up there ... (he lost the bet)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Grovel Nerdquist!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's not half as funny as hearing him talk . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DncElYQmAF0

Seriously, in terms of vocal sound and content, it's an endurance test . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +10000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. FDR? Truman? Maybe.
Reagan? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why doesn't he just found a Church of the Gipper?
He could exhume Raygun's body and cut off little pieces to administer to the faithful as communion wafers on Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Omigod!
NO!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Then the backside of Rushmore would have to depict him handing cash and weapons to Iran
in trade for them holding the hostages until Reagan got into office...Contra! Contra! Contra!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Maybe they could depict him signing the Garn/St Germain bill . . .
. . . the financial disaster dereg fuse that relaxed FDR-era thrift limits and officially turned Wall Street into a no-risk (because it wasn't THEIR money, it was the small guy/seniors') casino for life in which we were all the unwilling losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. According to those standards, Clinton should be on Rushmore, not Reagan
I mean Clinton did give us a surplus and the only scandals he had were not selling arms to Terrorists to fund illegal wars in Central America. All Clinton did was get a blow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think it would be nice if done accurately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldlib Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reagan was a bad actor
and an equally bad president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC