Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bachmann, Perry, Cain all had their turn. Who will be this month's anti-Romney?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:09 PM
Original message
Bachmann, Perry, Cain all had their turn. Who will be this month's anti-Romney?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-11 03:10 PM by bluestateguy
Takers? Anyone? Will there be one more anti-Romney flirtation before the inevitable coronation? Or is the establishment now coalescing around their guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think Perry is out of it. His money and his vicious TV ads will put in back in the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No way, he was done weeks ago.
The video today sealed it.

Ron Paul is always hanging in there with his 10%, he could be next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Newt's turn for some attention. His campaign is a hopeless disaster, but they're desperate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Today was my original "dead"line day for Cain's campaign
He might last until Veterans Day, but I kind of doubt it. Who's next in the barrel as the anti-Romney? I think the Republicans have run through their supply, but there could be a late entry into the race. I caught the weekend news a couple of times, and had to have heard three times at least how the Republicans were still searching for a leader to anoint. Naturally, this being the popular media, they couldn't bring themselves to say that Republicans were in disarray (only Democrats can be in disarray in PopularMediaLand), but the viewer had to get that distinct impression.

I don't think anyone will get a second bite at the apple, but T Rump or Perry might get another shot at being the anti-Romney. Considering what happens when you Google his name, I don't think anyone's anxious to see Rick Santorum move into contention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I bet Sarah would be right up there in the top-tier if she changed her mind.
C'mon Sarah you know you want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Oh, she'd rocket to the top for a minute or two
But I think the time has passed for the financial disclosure requirement, so if she launched a real, live campaign, she'd have to let her adoring fans know just how rich they've made her for all the little she's done. And that certainly wouldn't serve the cause nearest and dearest to Quiterella's heart, so my guess is she'll make some half-hearted noises about jumping into the race just to get a little attention, and then scamper away again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Santorum as flavor of the month? Eeewwwww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. i'm waiting for the media to fall in love with newt all over again....
howie kurtz showed his love last month, but it didn't quite catch on...


The Resurrection of Newt Gingrich

Newt Gingrich summoned his remaining staff to the conference room of his K Street office in June, shortly after much of his team had defected, and delivered an old-fashioned pep talk.

“This is a football season,” he said. “You don’t just kick off the ball and win. Someone’s going to come hit you. We got hit. Get up.”

Gingrich told the team that his challenge over the summer was survival, followed by the chance for a breakout in the fall. And as the Republican presidential contenders prepare for a CNN debate Tuesday night in Las Vegas, he has, at the very least, cleared the first goal.

It would be too much to call it a surge, but the former House speaker has quietly slipped into third place in several recent polls. A Public Policy Polling survey (PDF), for instance, shows Herman Cain with 30 percent, Mitt Romney with 22 percent, and Gingrich with 15 percent, edging out Rick Perry by a percentage point. And Gingrich’s favorable rating is up to 57 percent, with 30 percent holding an unfavorable view—this for a battle-scarred contender who the mainstream press has all but written off as a loser.

http://news.yahoo.com/resurrection-newt-gingrich-050200492.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Romney is trying to be the anti-Romney

Why else take 2 positions on every issue?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Romney himself n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Newt Blingrinch would be my guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why is Ron Paul almost never mentioned?
He's a nut, but he's a libertarian psychopath who occasionally makes sense when it comes to trade policy and foreign wars. Ron Paul has actually made some strong showings in the polls but the Republican establishment and the media pretend he doesn't exist. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. he completely breaks from the bipartisan consensus on almost every foreign policy issue
The fundamentalist right cannot rally behind him because of his position on Israel. Furthermore, the neoconservatives are still a strong influence in the GOP. He is much farther from these points of view than Obama and almost every prominent Democrat. Also his position regarding drugs makes him all the more unacceptable. There is no way he will start leading the pact. His position on these issues are simply farther from mainstream Republican thinking than Obama or any prominent Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. ron paul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. it could be Gingrich - he does hold a lot of poltical IOU's and could start calling in favors
now that all the other non-Romney's have faded...but it's hard to say...anything could happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC