Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress getting rich off trading stocks on insider information: Jailed lobbyist Jack Abramoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:03 AM
Original message
Congress getting rich off trading stocks on insider information: Jailed lobbyist Jack Abramoff
Congress getting rich off trading stocks on insider information: Jailed lobbyist Jack Abramoff dishes dirt on book tour
By Michael Zennie

Last updated at 8:08 PM on 12th November 2011

Comments (1) Add to My Stories Share
Members of Congress and their aides use insider information to make up to hundreds of thousands of dollars trading in the stock market, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff said.

Mr Abramoff, who was one of the most powerful men in Washington before he was convicted of fraud and sent to prison for three years, said lawmakers who had no background in finance bragged to him about their trading at least a dozen times.

(It s NOT illegal for COngress to trade on inside information. They exempted themselves from the law on this subject. Elehhhhna)


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060738/Congress-getting-rich-trading-stocks-insider-information-Jailed-lobbyist-Jack-Abramoff-dishes-dirt-book-tour.html#ixzz1dbNQcZWq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is news?
If I was on any banking committee, I'd be making tons of dough, all legally done with insider information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's news to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Duh! The average US Senator is worth over 3 1/2 mil.
Some started with less than 50 k in bank, but have 50 mil after a couple terms! Duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. GREAT 'unintended consequences' of 'getting' abramoff,
he's providing lots of evidence in support of the 99%. IF this exemption is real, we all need to know about it and add it to list of 'get rid of the damn thing.' AND if its intended solely for 'members,' their staff member users could be in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The exemption is real.
Why it was no big deal for Cantor to hold short positions (betting against growth) in US Treasuries during the debt debacle.

Congresspeople can trade any damn thing they want on any damn information they obtain, regardless of how said information is obtained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. One small problem with the title of this story
True, Abe Jackemoff was jailed, but the shithog is walking around free, even as we speak. Fookin' shame, that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Disagree, tho understand the sentiment.
He served 3+? years, and is NOW uncovering LOTS of crap, giving everyone including 99%, evidence, fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Agree with your assessment
and upon further reflection realize that we should be thankful that the fact he served at all is even mentioned. I have to wonder, however, why NOW is Abe Jackemoff spilling his guts? There's no compelling reason for it; he's served his time and he can live off whatever ill-gotten gains he's managed to squirrel away from prying eyes. Here's hoping investigators find the reason for this unexpected mea culpa and round of incriminating some in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. He's said he has nothing, and has spent a lot, in the past, on 'good works.'
I believe he's had a real awakening; jmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hope you're right
and that this isn't part of some campaign to besmirch prominent Democrats. Still, it's hard to believe that Abramoff would place himself and his family in jeopardy by pissing off some very powerful people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Meant to recommend M.Moore's comment on his 'meeting' w Abramoff;
check it out. Coincidental, in 'hall' btwn interviews w ? Lawrence? Charlie Rose? MM believes quite sincere, and thanked Abram...

Abram... said deliberately NOT mentioning names; intention of book is to encourage change in the entire system. vis a vis all of this crap.

As to jeopardy, he's already been there; not much more to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. A few years back, it was brought out that one congressperson's office
had--whatever now is used for ticker tape machines--set up with at least one person in charge of bidding. I know I didn't dream that. Anyone remember who that was? At the time, they said it was legal.

It should NOT be allowed, IMVHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. March, 2006: Insider-Trading by a Top DeLay Staffer in Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC