Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bradley Manning supporters face judge for attempting to lay flowers outside Quantico marine base

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:05 AM
Original message
Bradley Manning supporters face judge for attempting to lay flowers outside Quantico marine base
This is six days old, but I do not recall reading it here. Not copyrighted. Wonderful Ann Wright is present, as usual!

http://www.bradleymanning.org/news/bradley-manning-supporters-to-face-judge-for-attempting-to-lay-flowers-outside-quantico-marine-base

Bradley Manning supporters face judge for attempting to lay flowers outside Quantico marine base
November 7, 2011. Bradley Manning Support Network.

Four supporters of accused WikiLeaks whistle-blower PFC Bradley Manning appeared today before a judge in Manassas, Virginia, to face charges stemming from their arrests in March outside of a Marine military brig in Quantico, Virginia. These supporters were arrested along with many others who are outraged at the abusive confinement conditions to which PFC Manning was subjected during the eight months he was held at the Quantico Pre-Trial Confinement Facility. They were detained after military officials reneged on their offer to allow flowers to be placed at an Iwo Jima Memorial located at the entrance to the base.

Among those arrested attempting to lay flowers were veterans and family members of veterans, including Daniel Ellsberg, the “Pentagon Papers” whistle-blower. Instead of accepting their charges and paying fines, these four supporters pleaded not-guilty and chose to assert their First Amendment rights inside the courtroom.

Speaking before her scheduled appearance today, retired U.S. Army Colonel Ann Wright explained why she felt obliged to speak out:


“I felt the pre-trial conditions of solitary confinement and nudity that PFC Bradley Manning was subjected to in the Quantico brig for many months were outrageous and that public action by veterans and citizens to show their concern for the rights of this soldier was necessary.”

Following sustained public pressure, Bradley Manning was moved to a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He is no longer being held in solitary confinement. Military officials have denied speculation that the recent announcement of the impending closure of the confinement facility at Quantico was a result of widespread condemnation of the mistreatment.

Circuit Court Judge Mary Grace O’Brien dismissed the charge against Col. Wright of “remaining at place of riot or unlawful assembly after warning to disperse,” finding insufficient evidence. Various minor traffic-related charges were upheld against the other three defendants. The defendants testified that they were compelled to directly petition the Quantico military detention center, because PFC Manning was being subjected to severe mistreatment in violation of his constitutional rights and international standards of human rights.

The Commonwealth Attorney, arguing on behalf of the state, claimed that the defendants should be found guilty because they were engaging in civil disobedience. Drawing parallels to the civil rights movement, the Commonwealth Attorney argued that the defendants should accept their punishments instead of challenging them. Speaking in his own defense, Mr Obuszewski, a long-time peace and justice activist from Baltimore, Maryland, clarified that the demonstrators at Quantico were engaging in “civil resistance” and not “civil disobedience.” He noted that civil disobedience typically refers to deliberately breaking a law that one considers to be unjust, and that they found nothing inherently unjust about the normal application of traffic laws. Civil resistance, on the other hand, entails the use of direct action to challenge unjust abuses of power. Demonstrators had engaged in civil resistance by shutting down the entrance to the Marine base for several hours.

In announcing her findings, Justice O’Brien concurred that the case “does bring in larger questions” about the motivations of the demonstrators. Although she agreed that these larger issues are relevant, she felt that they “would not be appropriate for me to consider.”

The guilty parties were each ordered to pay fifteen dollars in fines and court costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msedano Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. where have all the flowers gone...
gone to soldiers, every one. when will they ever learn.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. A heinous crime. Thank goodness our legal system is going after these flower-terrorists! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. This news is being suppressed....Kr to the front page. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Some asshole apparently brought it back down to +4
I just put it back to +5, assuming that's what you did the first time around.

As for myself, I'm posting this from a puddle of warm pee under my bed. I've been taught well to be in a state of abject terror at the thought of flower-bearing protestors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The anti-Manning crew are alive and kicking. I just bumped it
to 6 recs, enough to innoculate it for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:43 AM
Original message
Has Manning even had his trial yet?
Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Has Manning even had his trial yet?
Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No, he is still held without trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hmm...yah. Real dangerous characters.
Laying flowers. Ya gotta punish that sort of thing.

Next thing ya know they'll be doing........... godknowswhat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. There is a very virulent suppression squad on this site
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 02:43 PM by ooglymoogly
That is successful in keeping things uncomplimentary to "0" from reaching the front page. In some ways it is like the 60 vote majority in congress, needed to get anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Rec'd
Manning tried to report torture, and rather than prosecute the torturers, he is the one being prosecuted.

Whistle-blowers do not fare well in this country today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC