Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton proposes 5K new State Dept employees. Good or bad?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:11 PM
Original message
Clinton proposes 5K new State Dept employees. Good or bad?
Hillary Clinton's State Department Wish List

— By Siddhartha Mahanta
| Thu Dec. 16, 2010 9:11 AM PST

If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah have their way, the United States diplomatic corps might get a major boost in power and personnel. Realistically? They probably won't.

On Wednesday, Clinton, Shah, and other top officials announced the release of the first-ever Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). Modeled after the Defense Department's own quadrennial assessment, the QDDR represents the culmination of a two-year effort to consolidate and bolster "civilian power"—a concept Clinton defines as the "combined force" of government officials working on diplomacy, development, and crisis and conflict-related projects. "The QDDR is a blueprint for how we can make the State Department and USAID more nimble, more effective, and more accountable," Clinton said. What will more civilian power look like in practice? Clinton and Shah hope to hire 5,500 new foreign and civil service personnel, and hand more autonomy to ambassadors and chiefs of mission.

>snip<

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/12/hillary-clinton-state-department-wish-list


How do you see this? I see it as better than hiring more Blackwater thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Batshit Crazy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least if no Blackwater thugs are hired it would not increase the number.
The fear is they be the suit version of the pricks, maybe even their suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about just staying OUT of other countries' business?
Maybe we'd be "safer" if we did not go around telling other people how WE want them to "behave".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I see it beefing up Hillary's purview with people beholden to her.
Not saying it would necessarily be bad; I'd certainly rather spend on the State Dept. than on weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Since nobody else will want it, I'll volunteer for beach duty anywhere in the Caribbean. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who wants diplomatic solutions to the world's problems?
We can solve every problem the world has by buying another carrier battle group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good.
The State Department has been shit on and underfunded for decades. Repubs hate State and until now so did the DOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess we need more spies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I view this as positive. The State Dept. has been weakened over the years.....
...... even as the Dept of Def. has tried to take over diplomatic roles..... and not being very successful. That's not their role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC