Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Jimmy Carter) America Is Ready for a Gay President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:34 AM
Original message
(Jimmy Carter) America Is Ready for a Gay President
Source: big think

Question: Is the country ready for a gay President?

Jimmy Carter: Well I think the entire population of America has come tremendous strides forward in dealing with the issue of gays. And I would say that the answer is yes. I don’t know about the next election, but I think in the near future. Because step-by-step we have realized that this issue of homosexuality has the same adverse and progressive elements as when we dealt with the race issue 50 years ago... or 40 years ago. So I would say that the country is getting acclimated to a President who might be female, who might obviously, now be black and who might be as well, a gay person. Yes, I would say the answer is, yes.

Read more: http://bigthink.com/ideas/25348
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
33Greeper Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rachel Maddow
would make a most excellent president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I really think that should would, too
She is an admitted policy wonk and one of the brightest & most eloquent people that I have heard discussing politics. I would support her candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Rachel is too damn nice.
We need a fucking bulldog who will FIGHT for the working class and the poor!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
65. She might surprise you
I sense she could be plenty mean if needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. The country, meaning the electorate, isn't.
A gay president would be most awesome, but we don't even have gay marriage legal in all 50 states yet. Hell, it took us this long to elect a black president and it will take much longer to elect a female president. We won't have a gay president for at least another 50 years.

I think we have a shot of naming an out supreme court justice though. And that would be a HUGE step!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. We won't have a gay president for at least another 50 years.
All the people in and around my generation (I was born in '56) have to die first. I mean it. Lots of people born between my parents and my generation still care about the "gay". And, though less, some in my and my older sister's generation still actively are concerned about homosexuality. But my niece (in her 20's) really doesn't give a hoot. Neither do her friends and even her cousins, who's mother is evangelical and very authoritarian. When the 20-somethings of today are 50-somethings (and in power... if you know what I mean) then it might be possible.

But that gay Prez better not be an ATHEIST!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
48. Too pessimistic, IMO. An out gay may not get your mom's vote, or even your sister's, but
a President does not need every single vote to elected. I know 80 year old heteros who are pro equal rights advocates and no one I know who is 45 or under gives a rap. It's a neo theo issue, for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh please...
Mr. Carter I respect you for saying this, however the United States isn't even ready for Bob and Steve down the street to be a happily married gay couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CurtEastPoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ...or serve openly in the military (fingers crossed!) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. And all the ruckus over BHO tells me we really weren't ready
for a Black president either. The U.S. is one of the most backward Taliban-like country in the civilized world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. ready or not, he's here
we may be backward, we may not be ready, but where there's a will sometimes there's a way

who would have believed in 2007 that our next president would be black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. I did. In fact, I believed it in 2004, after his speech at the Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
60. By 2007, a very large percent of the people on DU
We all knew that it would be a Democratic year. In the beginning of 2007, most of us, no matter who we preferred if given truth serum would have said that it would likely be Clinton. After her complete overreaction to the criticism of an answer at the Philadelphia primary, I know I was certain that Obama would win. (Hillary playing the gender card and Bill yelling it was swiftboating showed they were too brittle - meaning if someone could unite the ABC* vote, he would win. Edwards did not seem capable of capturing more than a highly dedicated base. Obama was the only viable alternative to Clinton.

ABC = Anybody but Clinton. This term is valid ONLY in the primaries and this was an example of it. As Obama became increasing competitive with Clinton, I know Edwards supporters who independently switched to Obama specifically to block Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
56. Some of the ruckus is about race. The rest is about his policies and behaviors.
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:15 AM by No Elephants
Bush was perhaps the least respected President in my lifetime, counting both sides of the aisle and the general public, Carter being almost a tie. Both are noticeably white male Southerners--and supposedly very religious Christians, too. (I believe only Jimmeh on that one.)

The meme that the only reason for disagreeing with Obama is racism is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Is he that naive or was he just being provocative? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. Neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
49. IMO, you and Jimmeh are both correct. Please see Reply 46.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. We already had a gay or bi President
Abe Lincoln

He slept w/ other men when his wife was out of town and wrote a love poem to another
man's thighs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawn703 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I heard about Buchanan likely being gay
But didn't hear about Lincoln. I'll have to look that up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. we've had several gay presidents as far as i know
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 06:48 PM by pitohui
if by gay you mean a man who has or prefers sex w. another man

lincoln's letters to his male friend and sleeping partner seem to have been semi-suppressed although they've been around for a long time, they mostly aren't acknowledged although they are known to be his letters, there is always some excuse made about how an obviously erotic letter to a guy he's sleeping with somehow isn't what you think ( i assume by the same crowd that never figured out walt whitman was gay)

the powers that be are happy to acknowledge those gay presidents that are incompetent -- buchanan being the name one always hears, dumbya in my view is quite likely another but it's past time that we acknowledged that a gay man can be a leader and make difficult decisions

say what you like about lincoln, he was a leader and he made difficult decisions and nobody can crap on his brain power

if by "gay" we only mean people who are "out" well that's a different matter and is probably what carter refers to...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
52. While you're at it, look up Log Cabin Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Prolly had several that were on the DL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. The GOP knows this
Which is why they will groom Liz Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh please, this country wasn't really ready for a black president!!
Look at all the bile and hatred just because a black man is in charge. Multiply that by 10. This country is not ready for anything remotely gay until it gets it collective head out of its bigoted ass!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
59. Please see Replies 46 and 56.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobodyHere Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
67. Right
The media is so much nicer to John Kerry, the Clintons, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Yeah, that was my thought,
we've already had a gay president of GW Hoover. I believe he had to send his lover away to Poland when the speculation got too intense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. lol. an american president not allowed to marry his husband or serve in the army
not gonna happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. There is not an issue with gays to deal with.
There is an issue with bigotry to be dealt with!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bernie Sanders for President!!!
He'd have my vote over Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. PLEASE tell me you're not insinuating anything about Sen. Sanders' sexual preference.
Pleeeeeeeze?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Not at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
61. What in your mind was the connection between Sanders and this thread?
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:31 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Did you mean Congressman Barney Frank?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Playinghardball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. No!
I want Bearnie to run!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Because being "gay" would be an insult?
Do you think less of Sander's if his sexual orientation were not what you thought it to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Of course not.
But many, many others, even here at progressive (?) DU, seem to. So I get a little trigger-happy when I see stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Awesome.
I figured that was what it was. I have seen way too many of your posts, so I was surprised and hoped I was misreading. Thanks for explaining!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
55. How about because being gay would be irrelevant to who should be Presdent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm just wondering when the hell we're going to elect a PROGRESSIVE president.
I may be a waiting sumbitch on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. John F. Kennedy was a progressive,
particularly for the Cold War standards of his time.

And look what they did to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #28
47. 11-22-63 = Message Sent from the Oligarchs to the "People", IMO.
"Cross us, and you'll be taking a dirt nap in Arlington. This is OUR country . . . and don't you FORGET it." Kennedy had to rein in a lot of evil during his presidency; from obstinate Steel and assorted industry bosses to generals that seriously wanted to start a without-just-cause nuclear war with the Soviet Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
62. No, he was a liberal. So were Bobby and Teddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #62
73. I did add the disclaimer that it was by the standards of his time.
There were those in the intelligence, military and industrial worlds to
whom he was a dangerous radical who had to be stopped at any cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Does he mean in 2012?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
63. The answer to your question is in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. I believe we've been there done that
although it's sad we are still talking about it and pretending that all our past leaders MUST have been heterosexual and that it's any kind of a deal if someone is gay or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #25
66. Don't you think Maddow and Jimmeh meant "openly gay?"
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:42 AM by No Elephants
America's always been ready for well-closeted gays.

For that matter, many say Obama is not really our first African American President, only our first visibly African American President. No idea if that is so or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamuti Lotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. I would settle for a halfway decent president, don't really care who they fuck on the side
Basic decency being a key general character trait I look for, and that hasn't ever been tried yet...and certainly not in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
50. Um, this is not about a 'fuck on the side' this is about relationships
A gay President would have a gay partner, not a fuck on the side. Would you refer to any First Lady as a 'fuck on the side'? No.
This is about the idea of an openly gay President, not about a person with stuff 'on the side'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. My money is still on James Buchanan as the first.
Someone's sitting on those letters from Rufus. They'll come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yeah, right.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. of course
America can't even rethink it's economic and social future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. God bless President Carter! It's important for people of his stature to say things such as this.n/t
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
68. Kudos to the first poster on this thread to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
38. I'm sure that the PTB can find one that's a corporate whore
Worked fine for women and minorities, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
69. Liz Cheney for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
39. But not an atheist one..
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Nope. We couldn't be elected to city dogcatcher.
One day...one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. Pete Stark is House Member from CA 13th since 1973
Open about his atheism I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #53
64. Cool.
I'm so used to life here in the bible belt, it's hard to imagine other places being more open minded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #39
70. Maybe the two are related. Being anti-gay is very much tied to the Bible, supposedly, anyway.
I think fewer younger Americans are neo theo and that is why fewer younger Americans are not consumed with homophobia.

And, as with gays, I'd be surprised if we've never had closeted atheists in the Oval Office. Indeed, I'd nominate Dummya as the most recent, if not the current occupant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
40. He needs to go rest,we can't even get a liberal elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #40
58. Please see Reply 46. Hell, Im even optimistic the pendulum will swing in favor of liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
41. OK, so long as she is not a republican....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
42. When will we have the first android President?
Married to a Roomba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
45. You mean Lincoln doesn't count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
46. A President's putting it out there is very important. Saying "no" would have been awful.
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 09:51 AM by No Elephants
Give Jimmeh a little credit, y'all. He's rocket scientist, ya know (for real).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
54. Jimmy is a smart man
This a a master redefining the parameters of the discussion. Jimmy refolds the envelope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
57. Smart man
that Jimmy Carter

I agree with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
71. The entire South will have to be sedated
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 10:59 AM by dbt
for this to happen. Being born and raised and still choosing to live in Arkansas (GASP!), I can tell you that the only thing Goodle Boys hate worse than N****rs is Q****s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RugbyGod Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
72. I don't think so
I am ready but the question was is America. Based on what I see, the answer is Moops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC