Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bobby Jindal's 'Crummy' Sand Berms Didn't Really Stop Any Spilled Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:58 AM
Original message
Bobby Jindal's 'Crummy' Sand Berms Didn't Really Stop Any Spilled Oil
The GOP's rising star, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, was the driving force behind the construction of sand berms to curb the Gulf oil spill. They were considered environmentally unsound, and a presidential commission has found that they didn't even work.

A draft of the commission's report was released yesterday, and aside from the obvious (BP), Jindal comes out looking pretty scummy. That shouldn't really shock anyone, but the particulars of the berm deal are pretty bad. So what really happened? Well, the berms cost about $220 million to build with another $140 million committed to finish the project. The report describes them as "underwhelmingly effective, and overwhelmingly expensive." The sand berm project got nearly three times more money than any other oil spill relief project in Jindal's state of Louisiana.

But how does Jindal himself feel about the berms' effectiveness? According to Bloomberg, on November 15, Jindal appeared on the Today Show touting the project's effectiveness: "The reality is, it worked. And the reality is, it prevented that oil from getting into the wetlands 15 to 20 miles away." Hmm. How well did it work? According to the presidential commission's report, the berms only stopped about 1,000 barrels of oil... out of about 5 million barrels that were spilled into the Gulf of Mexico. Nice try, Bobby!

And Jindal could have listened to skeptical experts during a June meeting to weight the pros and cons of moving ahead with the project. According to the report, "A Coast Guard officer present at the summit offered a similar assessment. According to that officer, the experts ‘all said it's pretty crummy' and offered no ‘glowing endorsements' of berms as a spill response measure." That sure doesn't sound like something a fiscally responsible Republican would get behind.

Jindal responded with a typically shitty statement, calling the report "partisan revisionist history at taxpayer expense," which means we can call Bobby's Berms "the result of very little scientific evidence, at the environment, and people of Louisiana's expense," right? So, to all of the Gulf residents struggling to squeeze money out of BP in the wake of the oil spill, you can thank Bobby Jindal for sucking up hundreds of millions of dollars for a joke of a relief project.

http://gawker.com/5714484/bobby-jindals-crummy-sand-berms-didnt-really-stop-any-spilled-oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Poopy Pants Vitter can get elected in Louisiana
Bobby can do no wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder how much Jindal made off the deal......????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. As opposed to the coast guard/BP plan of doing nothing.
I give him credit for stopping 1,000 barrels of oil at BP's expense. It's 1,000 more barrels than BP would have stopped.

That doesn't take away from the fact his another in a long line of swarmy LA politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Unnecessary
The slam at Louisiana is unnecessary, every state has their share of worthless politicians. Florida is no exception, but I will not be so crass as to name names. Jindal is worthless because he is a Republican ass-kisser, not because he comes from Louisiana. Comments like these distract from the real cause of corruptions---Republican and corporate policy---by making it seem there is "someting in the water" of a particular locale. Louisiana is not to blame, greedy politicans and money interests that fund them are. It is the same for Louisiana as Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's Obama's fault
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 09:09 AM by Roy Rolling
for catching all the oil before it had the chance to be deposited on sand berms. Why does Obama hate giving jobs to US corporations? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bobby Jindal's 'Crummy' Political Ideas Don't Really Do Anything.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. think of all the Volcanoes you could have monitored for that dough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC