Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Still you support Aasange?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nmbluesky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:33 PM
Original message
Poll question: Still you support Aasange?
He goes to court for sex rape Change today...
He still hero for Wikileak..or he not because He isn't hero because of he raped!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your only options are "I still support him even though he raped someone" and negative choices
because he raped someone.

Innocent until proven guilty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. He didn't "rape" anyone. Look at the big picture, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. where's the "I think it's a set-up" option?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. What?
First, he isn't actually charged with "rape", he's charged with not using a condom.

Second, it would appear you're convicting him without a trial which is not exactly just and proper.

Third, if you slow down, think before you type, and collect your thoughts, your English (which I assume is a second language for you) will be much more accurate and readable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. No, he's charged with having sex with a girl while she was asleep and not stopping when asked
It isn't just "not wearing a condom".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Actually, he hasn't been charged at all and hasn't seen any
of the evidence against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. The evidence against him is the word of his accusers.
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:52 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Whether he is guilty or not, dismissing the alleged act as "nothing" is pretty vile, IMHO.

Yes, holding someone down and coming inside of them when she asked you not to should be assault. Yes, having sex with someone who is not conscious to give consent is rape.

Did he do those things? I don't know and we'll probably never know...the only ones who know are his accusers and him. But those are two vile acts and if someone committed them should be punished and it's a little disgusting that liberals are blowing it off as "not using a condom".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. But we don't know "the word of his accusers".
We know what has been reported. That's what I mean. There is nothing on the record and no one is being held responsible for the version that you are repeating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. We know what his accusers have alleged he did.
And those allegations are not of "sex by surprise" or "having sex without a condom". They are for sexual assault.

He might be innocent entirely. But that is NOT what some people are saying-they are saying that the crimes are essentially not really rape.


Sorry, but sex with a sleeping woman and not stopping sex when asked is RAPE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Again, since he has not been charged, there is no official record
of the allegations against him. There are media reports and rumors. That is what you are calling "rape".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Do you think holding down someone and having sex with them after they tell you to stop is not rape?
Do you think having sex with someone who is asleep and has not consented is not rape?


The only way he is innocent of rape is if he didn't do it. There is no gray area here, those acts are rape not "rape".

Read about the report here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. You are assuming a great deal.
Both women have said they were not raped. The allegation against Assange is of having unprotected sex. And yes, I read that. If these women were alleging rape, he never would have gotten permission to leave Sweden and travel to the UK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
80. You seem pretty sure this happened..
.. I have no fucking idea why.

I hope you are never in a situation where it is assumed you have commited a crime because SOMEONE SAID SO.

Wait, I change my mind, that's exactly what you need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dutifully following the narrative of 'rape' I see.
Having sex w/o a condom is not rape.

Goofy ass poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Not stopping sex when asked is rape. Having sex with a woman without her consent (she was asleep)
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:45 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
is rape.


And neither of those things have any bearing on his being right or wrong on Wikileaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why would I stand with him no matter what or believe he raped anyone?
The consensual rape thing doesn't wash with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's another point.
The poll gives simple minded choices that do no reflect one's decision making process.
The man can be a serial murderer, to which I would like him in prison forever, but I would still like him to release the info he has obtained.

Again, goofy assed poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is a "push poll' and DU'ers know better! Only lousy options...he raped NO ONE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. Lousy options.
.... from someone who can barely speak English.

Anyone that actually believes there is anything like a rape involved here is a drooling moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I don't support him mass releasing 250,000 diplomatic documents
simply because he could.

I could have supported him selectively releasing important documents, as Ellsberg did with the Pentagon papers. But I don't support his willy-nilly release of thousands of documents opportunistically and I don't believe in his idea of complete transparency being necessary or even helpful to diplomacy or promoting peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustipatedinCA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. who released 250,000 documents?
By your admission, you should now recant and support Assange. He hasn't released 250,000 documents. Wikileaks has been releasing them slowly, over time, selectively. I know it's still in you to hate him, but you'll have to find a different rationale, since the one you've used is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. He has promised to release all those documents over time.
And the release of most of those documents that have come out so far, in my opinion has served no good purpose. For example, letting North Korea know about our negotiations with China. Dumb, dumb, dumb -- unless, of course, he's trying to stir up trouble in that corner of the world.

As for his claim of "redacting," pulling out names from documents is not enough for him to protect identities of those who may need protection. He has no way of knowing what clues he's supplying to those who would like to hurt our overseas allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are these two things
mutually inclusive?

A broken condom during consentual sex doesn't sone like rape to me, if that is all that happened. I don't support anyone who is convicted of rape. Being charged isn't being convicted.

The WikiLeaks is a separate issue entirely IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Allegedly the condom broke, she asked him to stop and instead he held her down and finished
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:47 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
That sounds like rape to me. But I absolutely agree with your basic point-Wikileaks and the rape charges are two separate things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. If that is what happened
then I agree about it being rape. If that's what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. The only evidence is her word, which isn't enough in a court of actual law.
A kangaroo court might convict based on he-said-she-said, but a court that actually has integrity will acquit in a millisecond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. How...
would she have known that the condom had broken unless he had stopped and pulled out? Unless she has a vaginal eyeball, that's not a fact that would have come to light till after they were done.

I'm sorry. Her whole story is garbage. I call BS.

I think the second woman is telling the truth. However, she IS responsible for saying no if she doesn't want sex, and "couldn't be bothered" to do so. He's an asshole for refusing to take a test, sure, but I doubt he's psychic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. She knew because she felt
his wiki leak. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. *snicker* n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #60
76. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's called "selective outrage"
Apparently, rape is OK in certain instances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. I suggest you become better informed.
I suspect you're very, very uninformed when you vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. What a crock of shit poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. this is a steaming pile of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nmbluesky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well.. I guess this poll is piece of shit..
I"m so bored stuck during snow storm...

Sorry!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Just add the "Assange conspired with manning to get data from siprnet
and use it for his own purposes option" It is neither good nor bad, just a possibility. Supposed to snow tomorrow here. Its fun when I dont have to drive with the nuts here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. I stand with him, because the rape charges are complete bullshit.
Assange isn't guilty of anything except pissing off powerful politicians, who retaliated by cooking up this bogus rape prosecution, that has no evidence behind it other than "He said, she said" and a broken condom, involving women who had consensual sex with him, one of which has ties to the CIA.

All this from a country that seems to let every real rapist within its borders skate free, yet somehow sees fit to call an international manhunt and demand for extradition for Assange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. more blame the victim nonsense.
If George Bush had done this rather than Julian Assange, you'd be screaming for his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. False equivalence.
There's mountains of evidence of Bush's crimes. There's zero real evidence that Assange committed rape or any other crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. "sex rape" ? As opposed to what other type of rape?
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 04:59 PM by Motown_Johnny
Adrian Monk, is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. So who do you work for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. Other:
Worshiped by idiots no man make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Oh...And...
Surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
38. Apparently we're outsourcing out internet astroturf jobs to India, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. But OP told me his name was Chuck! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. Classic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
87. Doing the jobs Americans won't do /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. You need to read up more on what is said to have happened. Does not appear to be rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. If he raped someone, I would not support him. I don't believe he raped someone but even if he did,
I would still support Wikileaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. So much for the basis of any rational legal system - the presumption of innocence.
I guess he's guilty because someone says he's guilty. I guess we can just jail his ass and throw away the key.

Great - I say GW Bush and Darth Cheney are war criminals. Can we hang them now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
56. Presumption of innocence is only for a court of law.
There is no such requirement in the court of public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. the sex/rape charge is bullshit
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 05:48 PM by pitohui
as a woman i especially resent bullshit accusations of sex assault/rape being used to harass somebody when my attacker walks free and the attacker of virtually every female victim i know walks free

don't insult my spirit and my intelligence

if assange is guilty of some crime, how come biden says he isn't? home come the house judiciary committee says he isn't? i think biden is a more credible person than somebody who has a history of posting a website telling women how to get "revenge" by making false rape accusations


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
46. Wikileaks isnt Assange
I support the exposure of truth. I also support a person is innocent until proven otherwise, I don't consider just the accusation worthy of conviction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
48. Nmbluesky, you are trying waaaaay too hard. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. No option for never supported and hope he rots?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #49
78. Hey, you! What do you think of the recent developments in Congress re: DADT?
I'd like to read your opinion on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
50. What's a "sex rape Change"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
51. Fuck yes, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
53. you forgot about pedophile, serial killer, and terrorist

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
55. May I back you into an Emily Litella?
There is, as yet, no formal evidence in the public domain that he committed any act that could be defined as rape as we understand it. Nor has he been charged. He is wanted for "questioning" even though he made himself available to the prosecutors when the shit first hit the fan. Since then, after the first prosecutor dropped the charges and allowed him to leave the country, a SECOND prosecutor (do check who and where came from) has made an issue of something which NORMALLY IN SWEDEN is a "misdemeanor offense" despite their strange definitions. Do also read Michel Moore's letter:

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/dear-government-of-sweden

I'm a Libra and reserve the absolute right to change my opinion when presented new and credible information. YMMV.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
57. STUPID POLL! Please watch this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
58. Both/and
I think that wikileaks is, on the whole, a good thing, and that it's more than possible that Assange is being targeted for being the public face of an organization that tweaked off many governments, and also that it's entirely likely that Assange is, indeed, a rapist, a pig, and a bully. I have no problem accepting both of those things. I am baffled as to why Assange is the focus of so much attention, as opposed to wikileaks as a whole. If Assange got hit by a lightning bolt on his way to court, I doubt it'd change a damn thing. There are several wikileaks clones springing up. The genie is out of the bottle on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
59. I support him completely and consider him a hero.
The rape "charges" are total bullshit and aren't even charges. He hasn't been charged with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
61. 'FUCK HIM because he rape to someone!!!'
Good gravy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
84. Are you in voting to after poll gravy?

Or not be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
62. Unrec because of the stupid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
63. HOW DO I SHOT WEB
How is babby formed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. I DUNNO LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. Oh deer, can't bee that ovious or can it?1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #63
85. I accidentally the whole thing. Is that bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
66. Unrec for obvious bias. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Well you know.... 90% support and the others
Are just the dust binds of history.


Yeah, the poll was a push.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
69. Still you read news?
Most of us read the news behind the headlines, and we read it from various perspectives, conservatives, liberal, US and foreign sources.

We know that what has been called rape to poison public opinion of Assange is allegedly having had sex without a condom, something many Americans do far too often.

We also know that when the Iraq and Afghan war logs were released, there were lesser sex charges attempted to discredit Assange and those had to be dropped for lack of evidence. So it seemed to us like this was another smear attempt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. A Poor Smear but his poll bears it out on support.

I don't trust US news anymore and neither should other americans
YOU ARE BEING FEED LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. Naomi Wolf calls out the spurious charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
70. What about, who cares?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaMae Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
72. He wasn't accused of rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. It was sex rape Change!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. All three!
:wtf: is sex rape Change? :rofl: It sounds like the OP is saying he forced somebody to have a sex change operation. That is the very first I have heard that accusation.

The stupid! It burns!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
74. i stopped supporting him after the last dump. nothing to do with charges. cant vote
the option isnt there.

what he dumped last time was bullshit. secrets, but bullshit. gossip. spite. childish. he wants the glory of what he is doing, he needs to do it responsibly. he failed.

he lost me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
79. "because of he raped"
Repetez en anglais, s'il vous plait.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. Be not am grammar is wrongs beside. Reelly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
82. "Yes the charges are bulshit (star f%cker$) and there is nothing wrong with the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
83. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC