Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why couldn't Obama give DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:13 PM
Original message
Why couldn't Obama give DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR
For every $1 billion he gave to the rich, why didn't he give $1 billion to the rest of us?
That would have covered the 99'ers, it could have funded some other programs, it could have funded that shortfall in Food Stamps--there is a lot of things that would have been equitable. But, asking me to be happy that he gave the billionaires some real cash and gave us chump change...THAT is hard to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obama TOLD Congress to approve it--without changing it
HE was the negotiator on this.

I believe Biden was sent to the Hill to deliver the message...Take it or Leave it.

Short memory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The answer is still "Congress". Whatever is proposed must pass
the House and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. This whole subthread and many posts on DU are as if
they just don't understand how a bill becomes law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That doesn't really hold water any more....
The whole "Obama doesn't control Congress" thing doesn't really work when he met with them to craft this tax legislation. He had more direct input in this legislation then the actual Democratic members of congress who weren't even included in the negotiations he had with the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He needed a tax plan THAT WOULD GET 60 VOTES in the Senate.
That's what Biden negotiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Excuses? Sorry, that fish rots from the head down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Reality. Obama can't simply reach into his ass and pull out a billion dollars
without the votes of the House and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because Obama can not fund anything...
It must be done by Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. But when Obama wants something, he's shown that he can make the Democrats
hold their noses & give him the funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Can he make Republicans do that, too? Actually, he can't even make all Democrats
do his bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. He can't make the Republicans do anything -- the problem is it's the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well, they can certainly mess with his agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes, over all, Democrats looked at the deal, examined what they would likely...
get next year, and recognized that this was the best they could get. Both Kucinich and Franken voted for this bill. They saw that it would really benefit their constituents in desperate need.

You can, if you wish, believe that Kucinich and Franken sold out to corpornazi's and are now drinking expensive champaign at Cheney's undisclosed location.

The fact remains. Obama can only ask Congress for money. Republicans know that they don't have to give it. They negotiated to get wha they wanted.

There will be a lot of not giving it after January 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Who knows how much better the bill could have been if our Democratic allies would have
been included in the negotiations. They weren't allowed to & we'll never know. Even in a court of law both sides are given the opportunity to defend their interests.

It was shoved down their throats & they had to vote for a very contentious bill that sacrificed some Americans' long-term needs in order to protect other Americans' short-term needs. One was as important as the other, both are Democratic interests, & Obama should have stood up firmly to the Republicans. The ball was in his court; he could have sat on the tax-cut extension for the super wealthy. He broke a major campaign promise at our expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Perhaps, but no matter who negotiated, they had to consider...
what the would get next year. I am not convinced that more Democrats in the room would have gotten a better deal. I am convinced that after January 5, there will be no good deals at all.

I do not believe that Republicans would have been willing to give anymore than they gave. They had the power to stop it and knew that all the benefit from the right and moderates would accrue to them if they waited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Sherrod Brown talked to his constituents and they told him to vote for it
I would imagine Ohio residents like unemployment insurance and don't want to see the middle class and below get hit with a tax increase during a recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I certainly understand that!
As I've already said above in another post, this bill was shoved down the Democrats' throats. One long-term Democratic ideal was sacrificed for a short-term Democratic problem fix. Our Democratic allies weren't given the opportunity to participate in the negotiations, but they were mature enough to bite the bullet. I certainly don't care to see out-of-work families suffer, but we'll never know if our Democratic allies could have made a difference, where no one who could least afford it had to sacrifice for the benefit of the super wealthy.

In any case, the least we could expect from a president who campaigned on the "Yes, We Can!" slogan & specifically promised to discontinue tax cuts to the super wealthy is to stand up to Republicans' demands that he do the opposite.

Even though I fear for my husband's & my financial situation in a few years, I don't begrudge the desperately-needed money afforded by this bill to the unemployed. To the Rockefellers out there, they can put their gifts where the sun don't shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. I get the feeling lots of people cut the Civics/Government class in high school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I don't think any
schools teach that course now...which is unfortunate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because he was 'best'ed'!
And anyway, we don't count for shit - unless it's election time. I have now accepted this - it takes away disappointment and just leaves the anger - which is more useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yep. We're just electoral 'cannon fodder'.. get the troops out there
to get him elected/re-elected, and then tell them to fuck off for another 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Reminder: Senate tried to pass middle-class only tax bill. They did not have the votes
If the Senate could pass a middle-class only tax bill, that is what we would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama's net worth is only $10,111, 249, so he can't give anyone a billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck that. I want 10 dollars for every one they got!
Why sell ourselves short?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. LOL that would by a lot of ponies!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. You really have to wonder why it is that if the Utra Rich were demanding
The extension of a four percent increase knocked down, that he couldn't have seen to it that they receive a hike of at least 2 percent.

That is compromise. Giving away the store is NOT COMPROMISE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. the President and Congress must agree
Thats 536 people.

Some of them are Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC