Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So with the making work pay credit expiring. . . . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:33 PM
Original message
So with the making work pay credit expiring. . . . . .
and the payroll tax reductions, isn't this almost a wash for working class people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chalcedony Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually it's worse
the payroll tax reduction for those making les than $20K will not offset the loss of the making work pay credit.

That's why this wonderful bill will actually RAISE TAXES on the working poor.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, that's not true. Something NOT INCLUDED in the bill does not mean the bill
itself is raising anyone's taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. No, it won't raise the tax rate at all. But the end of the
Make America Work grant (which was always meant to be a one year stimulus only) means there won't be a special tax credit paid back to lower income taxpayers when taxes are filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Again, what difference does it make what the "tax rate" is
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 12:03 AM by AlabamaLibrul
The rich have higher marginal income tax rates, but end up paying less thanks to tons of loopholes.

The poor's tax rate "won't be raised", but they'll pay more.

That's like saying the price of a car didn't go up after you added the spray crap to protect the carpets, detailing, new windshield wipers, and an upgraded stereo, because the MSRP for the base model is lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know. What's the argument you're making?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3.  What I don't get is?
in most years, as someone that makes under 20,000 per year, because my with holdings are at the max I get back about the Febuary rent payment. Last year however, according to turbo tax I was gonna get back about 150. which ain't bad. But then I figured in the making work pay credit and I did get the usual Febuary rent payment. So does that mean Bush somehow sunset whatever I was getting in those years of his administration a year before the current sunset provisions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Make Work Pay also lowered your withholdings
so you got more with each paycheck. However, since you didn't pay as much in taxes your return wasn't as big (until MWP was included)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That was cool too so I took a loan from my 401k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's not an apples to apples comparison.
It also depends on your annual taxable income.

The 2% FICA reduction will result in a 2% increase in earned income for those who earn income and who will now pay income taxes on that "additional" 2%. It may, in some cases be less of an increase in monies than the Making Work Pay credit which was factored in after taxable income was calculated.

For those earning the least, it may in fact result in a loss of monies.

The best way to check is to run the numbers on the 1040 and the schedule M.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not true.
income taxes are due on gross income. A change in payroll taxes changes your net income. Your gross income remains the same.


Example: You make $50K per year. Your gross income is $50K.
In a normal year you pay $3,200 in SS taxes however your gross income is still $50K. Your federal incomes taxes will have $50K on the wages line.
Next year you pay $2,200 in SS taxes (resulting in $1K more net income) however you gross income is still $50K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Beg your pardon? Taxable income is the income subject to taxes.
Not all income is equal. Some is earned; some is capital gains; some is inherited, etc. IRS code has some specific definitions of what income is which type and what rates apply to which.

Then you will have an "adjusted gross income" (line 38 on 2009 1040) which includes adjustments as allowed by IRS code, then you'll have exemptions and deductions depending on forms of income and/or expenses, and on and on until line 41 (2009 1040) which is the taxable income.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well not kidding but SS tax doesn't affect taxable income.
$50K income w/ 0% SS contribution rate, 4.2% contribution rate, or 6.4% contribution rate has exactly the same taxable income.

The same amount is reflected in "wages" line of W-2 and thus same amount is recorded on 1040.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. That was the 90's. Don't remind me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC