Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huffpo: New Obama Scientific Integrity Memo Is Late And Vague

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:37 AM
Original message
Huffpo: New Obama Scientific Integrity Memo Is Late And Vague
WASHINGTON -- Nearly a year and a half after President Obama promised to issue guidelines to assure scientific integrity in the federal government, the White House on Friday sent out a skimpy four-page memo that lacks details, deadlines and enforcement mechanisms.

Scientists -- and science itself -- took a beating from dogmatic political appointees during the Bush era. So advocates of scientific integrity were heartened when Obama, who campaigned on the issue, sent out a memo just six weeks into his presidency, full of high-minded principles such as calling for "transparency in the preparation, identification, and use of scientific and technological information in policymaking."

He gave his science advisor, John Holdren, the director of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, 120 days to develop specific guidelines.

And then Holdren apparently hit some sort of a wall within Obama's own administration.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/17/new-obama-scientific-inte_n_798483.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama, vague on integrity? Quelle surprise!
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Change?

In perhaps the most glaring, recorded example of political interference, Obama's oil spill commission revealed in October that the White House itself had squelched attempts by NOAA scientists to make public the agency's worst-case estimate of how much oil could spew from the blown-out BP well in the Gulf of Mexico. Those "worst-case" estimates -- unlike the ones the White House were issuing -- turned out to be about right.

I feel helpless. I should have learned my lesson in the 90's. We all suffer from "This time is different syndrome", to quote a rather popular book title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. While I don't disagree, I have to note the irony of the Huffington Post
talking about "scientific integrity". They publish unscientific articles daily - promoting homeopathy, acupuncture, anti-vaccination, etc - and make little effort to distinguish between science and psuedoscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC