Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force officials overturn Osprey crash findings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 07:21 AM
Original message
Air Force officials overturn Osprey crash findings
Air Force officials overturn Osprey crash findings
By Bob Cox | The Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Posted on Friday, December 17, 2010

Senior Air Force generals overturned the findings of their own investigation team and ruled that the fatal crash of a CV-22 Osprey in Afghanistan in April was largely due to flight crew mistakes and not a mechanical problem.

But the general who led the crash investigation said Thursday that there was strong evidence to indicate that the $87 million-plus aircraft, which has a history of technical problems, experienced engine trouble in the final seconds leading to the crash.

Four of the 20 people on board were killed in the April 9 crash, including the chief pilot.

Crash site evidence showed that the pilot tried an emergency roll-on landing, as if it were a conventional airplane, rather than a vertical, helicopter-type landing the Osprey is designed to perform. The pilot performed the landing so well he nearly saved the aircraft and prevented a greater loss of life, the Air Force's Accident Investigation Board concluded in the report released late Thursday.

"I think they knew they were going down and they had some kind of power problem," chief investigator Brig. Gen. Donald Harvel said in an interview with the Star-Telegram after the report was released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. The government way
If you don't like the answer ........ just change it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Nice to see that they cling so tenaciously to their principles
even with a new Administration.

You gotta admire the way they refuse to let themselves be bound by reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Scariest thing I've ever seen fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. They're protecting the fat cushy jobs waiting for them
they couldn't care less about the people on the aircraft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. What are a few deaths to a billion dollar contract?
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 10:57 AM by Ichingcarpenter
Hell we can get a foreigner
to join our mercenary armies for a chance for Roman Citizenship,
there are billions available for that expendable carnage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You can buy only ten of these things with a billion dollars.
$100 million a pop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. They are doing this because they want to replace their aging fleet of supply craft with these things
The Air Force needed conventional runways to land aircraft like the C-5 or the C-130, but the Osprey promises them similar capabilities with little more than just a clearing or a dirt runway. It may look good on paper, but it is different in practice. Nobody cares beyond what it looks like on paper, and a shit ton of people are going to make money on that.

Besides, the only soldiers and pilots who are gonna die are from poor families who probably don't even have enough money to hire an attorney for obvious negligence on apart of the government. It's probably cheaper to let them die in the wreckage than spend money inventing a better aircraft. This is the Ford Pinto with wings. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC