|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:16 PM Original message |
Holy crap. Dig this Freeper quote on today's DADT cloture vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. maybe he meant CONCHSHELL OBJECTOR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Actually, that is exactly what HST told the troops when he integrated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. Skard of teh gay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Choice "C." all of the above. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. CONSICENCENT???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. So the guy has trouble spelling! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. The "Tea Party" has no position on DADT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. The Tea Party has a posiiton ... they just avoid mentiong it ... that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CurtEastPoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. heh heh...he said military member... heh heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
8. I guess they call that 'the wide stance' discharge - or they could just admit that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis-t (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. "CONDESCENDING OBJECTOR"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. "CONSICENCENT OBJECTOR" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'm cool with allowing the homophobes to be discharged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badgerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You've noticed that, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. I agree. Let them leave. If they stay, they agree it isn't a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still a Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. But the Tea Party isn't about social issues, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. They. Are. Screwn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
15. New Freeperism! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. there is a thread like that here also (worded differently) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiffenPoof (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Are They Aware... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 08:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. Did he mean CONSENTUAL OBJECTOR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swede (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. How do you spell "spellcheck" over there anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pamela (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
22. That sounds like a Panda name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
24. Spelling aside... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
25. I lost my handy dandy Freeperese to English handbook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ohio Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
26. Stupid teabaggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SalmonChantedEvening (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. con-si-ken-sent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
28. Simple spelling error. It's "non-sentient objector". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrus Romanus (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 08:56 PM Response to Original message |
29. LUMINESCENT REFRACTOR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
31. Funny thing is I actually agree with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-18-10 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. Whatever the hell kind of objectors they are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MemeSmith (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
33. The Fantastic By-product of this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
34. God, what mongs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 04:34 AM Response to Original message |
35. yes, they should be forced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
36. He Must Be A MAGNIFACTOR of the Crutch of CONSTIPATICENTOPOLOGY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
37. Military members were already living with "homosexuals" against their will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 07:07 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Hell in 1971 we had two openly gay men serving on my navy ship. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
38. I am pretty sure that free will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-19-10 07:16 AM Response to Original message |
40. D'Oh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 10th 2024, 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC