Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates, Broad, et al invested for "political leverage" in education. They succeeded.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 11:43 PM
Original message
Gates, Broad, et al invested for "political leverage" in education. They succeeded.
It's really amazing how they did it, and even more amazing and alarming how effective it has been.

They got the attention called to their efforts by donating huge amounts to the media. Then they went after public schools and teachers with a vengeance...blaming them for problems in public schools. Actually these problems were basically caused by the ongoing defunding of public education since the Reagan years.

From Dissent Magazine's article called Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools:

How billionaires control the schools.

Investing for Political Leverage

The day before the first Democratic presidential candidates’ debate in 2007, Gates and Broad announced they were jointly funding a $60 million campaign to get both political parties to address the foundations’ version of education reform. It was one of the most expensive single issue efforts ever; it dwarfed the $22.4 million offensive that Swift Boat Veterans for Truth mounted against John Kerry in 2004 or the $7.8 million that AARP spent on advocacy for older citizens that same year (New York Times, April 25, 2007). The Gates-Broad money paid off: the major candidates took stands on specific reforms, including merit pay for teachers. But nothing the foundations did in that election cycle (or could have done) advanced their agenda as much as Barack Obama’s choice of Arne Duncan to head the Department of Education (DOE). Eli and Edythe Broad described the import in The Broad Foundations 2009/10 Report:

The election of President Barack Obama and his appointment of Arne Duncan, former CEO of Chicago Public Schools, as the U.S. Secretary of Education, marked the pinnacle of hope for our work in education reform. In many ways, we feel the stars have finally aligned.


Did you see that statement by the Broads? With Obama's choice of Arne Duncan the "stars have finally aligned."

The time is now ripe for a corporate takeover of the public education system.

Arne surrounded himself with Gates people and others from the foundations of billionaires who felt the government control of schools was not giving them enough profit.

Within weeks, Duncan had integrated the DOE into the network of revolving-door job placement that includes the staffs of Gates, Broad, and all the thinks tanks, advocacy groups, school management organizations, training programs, and school districts that they fund. Here’s a quick look at top executives in the DOE: Duncan’s first chief of staff, Margot Rogers, came from Gates; her replacement as of June 2010, Joanne Weiss, came from a major Gates grantee, the New Schools Venture Fund; Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Russlynn Ali has worked at Broad, LA Unified School District and the Gates-funded Education Trust; general counsel Charles P. Rose was a founding board member of another major Gates grantee, Advance Illinois; and Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement James Shelton has worked at both Gates and the New Schools Venture Fund. Duncan himself served on the board of directors of Broad’s education division until February 2009 (as did former treasury secretary Larry Summers).


Duncan served on the board of Broad's education division. No wonder the Broads thought their stars were aligned.

And then there is that all-important way to control the districts themselves...mayoral control. Forgot the elected school board..get a mayor in that you like and give him the power.

On the question of who controls public schools, the Big Three much prefer mayoral control to independent school boards: a mayor with full powers can push through a reform agenda faster, often with less concern about the opposition. On August 18, 2009, the New York Post quoted Bill Gates on mayoral control: “The cities where our foundation has put the most money is where there is a single person responsible.” In the same article, the Post broke the news that Bill Gates had “secretly bankrolled” Learn-NY, a group campaigning to overturn a term-limit law so that Michael Bloomberg could run for a third term as New York City mayor. Bloomberg’s main argument for deserving another term was that his education reform agenda (identical to the Gates-Broad agenda) was transforming city schools for the better. Gates put $4 million of his personal money into Learn-NY. “The donation helped pay for Learn-NY's extensive public-relations, media, and lobbying efforts in Albany and the city.” The Post also reported that Eli Broad had donated “millions” to Learn-NY. Since Bloomberg’s reelection, however, the results of one study after another have shown that his reform endeavors are not producing the positive results he repeatedly claims.


And of course they had to donate to the media outlets to make sure that their project called Education Week was funded. It was well-funded, and it went on for a week. It was devastating to teachers who of course were not invited...well, maybe a token one.

Both Gates and Broad funded “NBC News Education Nation,” a week of public events and programming on education reform that began on September 27, 2010. The programs aired on NBC News shows such as “Nightly News” and “Today” and on the MSNBC, CNBC, and Telemundo TV networks. During the planning stages, the producers of Education Nation dismissed persistent criticism that the programming was being heavily weighted in favor of the Duncan-foundation reform agenda. Judging by the schedule of panels and interviews, Education Nation certainly looked like a foundation project. The one panel I watched—”Good Apples: How do we keep good teachers, throw out bad ones, and put a new shine on the profession?”—was “moderated” by Steven Brill, a hardline opponent of teachers’ unions and promoter of charter schools. The panel did not belong on a news show.


At the time of the week of broadcast of Education Nation, teacherken, a Daily Kos education blogger, had some interesting statements.

Questioning the list of speakers at Education Nation

Teacherken questions the list of speakers.

For many of us, that list was more than a little unbalanced, and illustrates much of what is wrong with discussions of education policy in this nation. There are many corporate executives, there are people from educational policy organizations, there are politicians, there are foundations. There are journalists. Many of these lack any real knowledge about education, or are well known for pushing a particular view of education to the exclusion of any other.

There are more than 30 names. Of these two are from parent organizations, and there is one representative from the smaller of the two national teachers unions.

Where are the voices of parents?


Where are the voices of those actually teaching?


There is a complete list of the speakers at the link.

There is a great article at The Guardian about the purpose behind the attack on teachers.

Ironically, the new push against teachers' unions, cloaked in discourse about the damage done by "bad" teachers, comes from Democrats. For example, Arne Duncan, speaking on behalf of the Obama administration in Little Rock, Arkansas on 25 August 2010, focused on teacher quality:

"The big game-changer for us, however, in terms of both formula and competitive programmes, revolves around the issue of teacher quality … Nothing is more important and nothing has a greater impact on the quality of education than the quality and skill of the person standing in the front of the class – and there is so much that needs to change in the way that America recruits, trains, supports and manages our teachers."

But the political attacks on teachers and unions, which come from both the left and the right, would likely not resonate as much as they have done, if it were not for the celebrity tour on the back of the documentary Waiting for "Superman", whose message has been perpetuated by celebrity reformers. Two of those, Bill Gates and Geoffrey Canada, share an entrepreneur status that suggests expertise on everything simply because they are wealthy.

..."Ultimately, this PR campaign by corporate and political leaders has been effective, even if it remains inaccurate. Teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement, and there is little evidence that teacher quality is the greatest issue, or even one of the main problems, facing student achievement in public schools.

The attacks on teachers and unions are not about educational reform, but turning the teaching profession into a service industry


Big money, corporate foundations...teachers and their unions are no match for the power they wield.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am so sickened by all of this. And the Guardian is so right--
Edited on Sat Feb-05-11 12:44 AM by bbgrunt

"The attacks on teachers and unions are not about educational reform, but turning the teaching profession into a service industry"--

edited to add a big thank you to madfloridian for keeping the truth out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's a shame this has been speeded up now.
I really did not think our party would do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. the last sentence should include the real losers...
the students and our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. As any billionaire vulture philanthropist
knows, the answer to improving quality (making more money)is to bribe low quality politicians and media hacks to pass and peddle laws so you can hire high quality people to work for low quality wages without interference from pesky labor unions. Which may explain how it has come to pass that Microsoft has so profitably retarded the development of computer software technology for the past 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm worried that our new governor has bought into this crap.
In an interview yesterday, in response to a question about budget cuts, he said something about dividing the educational funds in such a way that more money would go to schools that were "successful" than the traditional method of allocating funds on a per-student basis.

What that says to me is that schools with enormous class sizes are about to get pummeled yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I never understood
the concept of giving increased funding to those who were successful already. Obviously, they're successful with what they have, n'est-ce pas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. Might an inquiring mind query about the state or governor in question?
(Somehow I know you're gonna say Jerry Brown... though he seems to be trying to keep budgeting for K-12 flat-lined, which is better than what he is talking about doing to the university systems in the state... but, "on the bright side", his flat-lined budget proposals depend on Republicans letting ballot measures onto the ballot AND the public voting to extend taxes already in place... it's all bad.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. According to a strategy paper authored by one of the major investment banks in the mid-90s, "public
education is a $600 billion a year industry that we service but don't yet provide." The paper goes on to lay out a strategy for the private takeover of public education.

I have the paper if anyone is interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Can you create an OP with a link to the paper?
Or at least significant excerpts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What's the format? Is it easily shared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Please
post a copy or make it available somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Can you upload it to Google Docs and share it, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. please post it -- in google docs if you can't link direct. there are a lot of people who'd be
interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's the link to teacherken's full diary at DK
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/9/18/902996/-The-problem-with-NBCs-Education-Nationwhere-are-the-voices-of-parents-and-teachers

I couldn't pull it up when I posted this thread last night. It's very interesting and thorough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very interesting thread. Will read the links later. REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is this the same Eli Broad Foundation ( rhymes with "rode")...?
Is this the same Eli Broad Foundation that trains CEOs with strong Republican/NeoCon agendas to be secretly planted as Superintendants on school boards across the country?

Yes.. their goal is to take over public Education and turn it into a giant Wal-Mart with (guess who) collecting the profits?

----------------------------------------

The Broad Institute for School Boards is a national training and support program for urban school district governance teams of school board members and superintendents. The latest offering of The Broad Institute is Reform Governance in Action, a training program for reform-minded school board-superintendent teams to establish efficient and effective policies and processes that will improve board operations, strengthen management oversight and directly improve learning opportunities for students. In May 2007, the Broad Foundation donated $ 10 million dollars to the Alliance for College-Ready Public Schools, a high-performing public charter management organization in Los Angeles.

On April 25, 2007, the Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation joined forces with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledging a joint $60 million to create Strong American Schools, a nonprofit project responsible for running Ed in 08, an information and initiative campaign aimed at encouraging 2008 presidential contenders to include education in their campaign policies.<17>

Criticism of the Broad Foundation's Education Program The public education reform program of the Broad Foundation has come under criticism by education professionals, parents, and researchers for promoting policies based on the idea that public school systems should be run like private businesses. Critics believe that most graduates of the Broad Superintendents Academy and the Broad Residency do not have adequate training or education experience to lead school systems. Critics also argue that the reforms promoted by the Broad Foundation are having a negative effect on public education. These reforms include closing neighborhood schools in favor of privately run charter schools; using standardized test scores extensively to evaluate students, teachers, and schools; and merit pay for teachers based on test scores

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Broad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh Noes!!1! This is hugh!1!! I'm series!!!!1
"And then there is that all-important way to control the districts themselves...mayoral control. Forgot the elected school board..get a mayor in that you like and give him the power."

Yeah, forget the elected school board. Get a mayor that you like who... is not elected? Maybe the motivation is to be able to hold one person directly accountable, for better or worse. When a multi-member school board is in charge they can all point fingers at each other when something doesn't work, or individual members can assure us that they are in favor of changes to improve education; it's the other people on the board who are dragging their feet.

"In the same article, the Post broke the news that Bill Gates had “secretly bankrolled” Learn-NY, a group campaigning to overturn a term-limit law so that Michael Bloomberg could run for a third term as New York City mayor. Bloomberg’s main argument for deserving another term was that his education reform agenda (identical to the Gates-Broad agenda) was transforming city schools for the better. Gates put $4 million of his personal money into Learn-NY."

Yes, it was so secret that when the NY Post asked a Bill Gates spokesman about it he lied and tried to cover it up. Wait, no, that's not what happened...the spokesperson http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_ekjA6OeXIrxZjDATHPbkuJ">"confirmed the donation and the approximate size." It was obviously super-secret! :tinfoilhat: The same article goes on to say: "In related news, Bloomberg defended budgeting 8 percent raises for teachers over the next two years in spite of tough economic times, as The Post reported yesterday. "It would be irresponsible when all of the other unions have gotten for us not to put the pattern into the budget," he said. Wow, what a vicious attack on teachers! An 8% raise in spite of tough economic times. The nerve of that Bloomberg!

Then, to get a clearer picture of US education we go to...the UK's Guardian newspaper. Surely they understand the dynamics of the US education system better than US newspapers!

""The big game-changer for us, however, in terms of both formula and competitive programmes, revolves around the issue of teacher quality … Nothing is more important and nothing has a greater impact on the quality of education than the quality and skill of the person standing in the front of the class – and there is so much that needs to change in the way that America recruits, trains, supports and manages our teachers."

How is this statement controversial? That is, unless one thinks that the way that we currently recruit and train teachers cannot be improved; it's perfect as it is now.

..."Ultimately, this PR campaign by corporate and political leaders has been effective, even if it remains inaccurate. Teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement, and there is little evidence that teacher quality is the greatest issue, or even one of the main problems, facing student achievement in public schools.

Did you catch that? The author stated "Teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement...". So which is it? Either teachers are vitally important, or they are marginal bit players on the education stage. You can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Wow, you are really upset about my post. Sorry about that.
It is the administration that is putting all the blame on teachers so they can get rid of teacher job security because no one else has any of it and teachers shouldn't either....really great thinking. You get what you pay for usually.

Of course teachers are not the whole problem. You sound like you really caught me at something big, sort of a gotcha.

No time for gotchas, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No, I'm not upset
I'm simply offering counterpoints that are relevant to the points you made, imho.

I did not say teachers are the whole problem. However, you can't on the one hand state how vitally important quality teachers are to a child's education while also saying that poor student performance isn't the fault of teachers because "teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I "don't" state that. I have never said that.
It is the so-called "reformers" who are saying teachers are the whole problem. Of course we teachers were never the whole problem. It's propaganda meant to make teachers look bad so they bust our unions and close schools or turn them into charters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. You're right, I should have been more specific
For clarity's sake, the statement I'm referring to is:

"Teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement, and there is little evidence that teacher quality is the greatest issue, or even one of the main problems, facing student achievement in public schools."

You did not personally state that teachers can't be blamed for poor performance on behalf of students. However, since you chose to excerpt that statement from Guardian column in your OP it led me to believe that you agree with the premise. I apologize if I was wrong in my assumption. Let me rephrase:

Teachers are either a big factor in student success & failure or they are not. One can't, on the one hand, state how vitally important quality teachers are to a child's education while also saying that poor student performance isn't the fault of teachers because "teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. You do realize that you have taken quotes by different people and compared them out of context?
The 'teachers are vitally important...' quote seems, from the article, to be an Arne Duncan quote. It is just him saying something which is, in his mind, judging by the context, reason enough to threaten teachers and their unions if they don't do... whatever the hell Arne Duncan thinks they should do from now on, apparently. Including break dancing for kids on the off chance it might keep them more interested in economics, or devising ways to turn broken-down desks into Ali-Baba-esque Magic Carpets which will fly the children, no matter what their personal difficulties/issues might be— one and all unto a land where knowledge is available no matter how dysfunctional the home-life in which a child is left to study. I suspect this land involves a garden and apples on a tree.

On the other hand, you have the "teacher quality represents only a small percentage of achievement" quote... which is a paraphrase used by the author who, in turn, links to another article (http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/ib286) describing the complicated details which are being paraphrased... things like:

Even the president’s more careful statement — that teacher quality is the most important in-school factor — is actually without solid foundation in research. It is true that some studies have found that variation in teacher quality has more of an influence on test scores than do the size of classes or average district-wide per pupil spending. In other words, you are better off having a good teacher in a larger class than a poor teacher in a smaller class. But that’s it. It is on this thin reed that Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee are mounting a campaign to make improving teacher quality, and removing teachers whose students’ test scores are lower, the centerpiece of national efforts to improve the life chances of disadvantaged students.

There are plausibly many other in-school factors, not quantified in research, that could have as much if not more of an influence on student test scores than teacher quality. Take the quality of school leadership. Would an inspired school principal get better student achievement from a corps of average-quality teachers than a mediocre principal could get from high-quality teachers? Studies of organizations would suggest the answer is yes, but there have been no such studies of school leadership. Take the quality of the curriculum. Would average teachers given a well-designed curriculum get better achievement from their students than would high-quality teachers with a poor curriculum? A very few research studies in this field suggest the answer might be yes as well.


And the article goes on. You might want to try to ... you know... read it, before you try to push your superficial black&white choice as something more than a rhetorical bit of dou@#$ ba&&@^y.

I should probably "re-phrase" that... but I'll settle for the DU equivalent of a Colbert Bleep...

Your superficiality and rhetorical meanness (I mean that in the more typically British sense of the word... since using "niggardliness" is liable to be mis-interpreted by the less-well-informed mods into meaning something it, patently, does not mean...) should be grounds for shame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. If you have a point, you can make it without that nonsense.
In fact, if you believe in your argument, it does not serve you to put a dismissive sneer as your headline, past which very few will read your post (or even notice its substantial length and relatively serious attempt to deal with the issues). So really it's yourself you're sabotaging, as well as discourse you're killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. no, the motivation is to implement neo-lib deforms with a minimum of public oversight & dissent.
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 12:38 AM by Hannah Bell
that's how it's turned out everywhere it's been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ongoing DEFUNDING of education since Reagan???
Edited on Sat Feb-05-11 07:31 PM by Rage for Order
Were you able to type that with a straight face?

http://edpro.stanford.edu/hanushek/admin/pages/files/uploads/HESEDU2014-1.pdf

3. Aggregate United States performance

Given that student assessments provide a measure of school outcomes, it is possible to begin the investigation of how school resources (and other factors) relate to student performance. It is instructive to begin with the simplest overall evidence that comes from aggregate scores and then to move to more detailed analytical studies. The simplest and perhaps clearest demonstration of the resource story is found in the aggregate United States data over the past few decades. The United States, operating under a system that is largely decentralized to the fifty separate states, has pursued the conventionally advocated resource policies vigorously. Table 2 tracks the patterns of pupil–teacher ratios, teacher education and teacher experience. Between 1960 and 2000, pupil–teacher ratios fell by almost 40%. The proportion of teachers with a master’s degree or more over doubled so that a majority of all US teachers today have at least a master’s degree. Finally, median teacher experience – which is more driven by demographic cycles than active policy – increased significantly, almost doubling since its trough in 1970. American teachers are heavily unionized, and the most common structure of teacher contracts identifies teacher education levels and teacher experience as the driving force behind salaries. Thus, as teacher inputs rise and as the numbers of students per teachers decline, expenditure per pupil rises. As seen in the bottom row of Table 2, real expenditures per pupil more than tripled over this period. In fact, this period is not special in US schools. Over the entire 100 years of 1890–1990, real spending per pupil rose at a remarkably steady pace of 3.5% per year . Over this longer period, real per student expenditure in 1990 dollars goes from $164 in 1890 to $772 in 1940 to $4,622 in 1990 – roughly quintupling in each fifty-year period.


Table 2 is at the bottom of page 15 of the document linked above.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I wonder if they are counting the federal money now going to charter schools
that are able to send kids back to public schools if they don't perform well enough...but they get to keep the money at the charter?

The many links provided in your article are too hard to find on a search, so I am not sure.

Here are only 2 examples of public school defunding.

States get millions in federal money for charter schools as school libraries defunded.

Blogger gets it: Make big bucks by closing public schools, firing teachers, opening charters.

There are many links that point out that the government is now giving money to charter schools, which do not have to follow the rules of school boards in most cases.

You are talking about a 100 year period. Of course the funding is higher than in 1890! Of course. But the question is why are they taking it from public schools and giving it to charter companies?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The study I linked to referenced both a 40 & 100 year period
"Between 1960 and 2000, pupil–teacher ratios fell by almost 40%. The proportion of teachers with a master’s degree or more over doubled so that a majority of all US teachers today have at least a master’s degree. Finally, median teacher experience – which is more driven by demographic cycles than active policy – increased significantly, almost doubling since its trough in 1970. American teachers are heavily unionized, and the most common structure of teacher contracts identifies teacher education levels and teacher experience as the driving force behind salaries. Thus, as teacher inputs rise and as the numbers of students per teachers decline, expenditure per pupil rises. As seen in the bottom row of Table 2, real expenditures per pupil more than tripled over this period.

The "Table 2" that is referenced is titled "Public school resources in the United States, 1960–2000". This study was published in 2006, years prior to either of your links about defunding public schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. hmm...
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 12:41 AM by chervilant
The authors of your article reference a seminal study (The Coleman Report) which substantiated that the strongest predictors of academic achievement are a student's family and peers. They acknowledge that this study was "widely interpreted as saying that schools did not matter" (why does this NOT surprise me?).

In presenting US econometric evidence, the authors acknowledge that analyses of our system of public education subsequent to The Coleman Report "seldom rely on data collected specifically for the study of the educational process." They further acknowledge that "instead, {research} has tended to be opportunistic, employing available data to gain insights into school operations." (Look at Table 3, especially.)

In other words: garbage in; garbage out. The authors of your article conclude that "there is a tendency by researchers and policy makers to take a single study and to generalize broadly from it," and that "much of the research that moves into policy has not adequately identified the underlying causal structure" of any measurable data.

I have to wonder why you are so intent upon denigrating madfloridian's OP, when the article you proffer validates many of her concerns. That our system of public education is in dire need of an overhaul is inarguable. However, 'bad teachers' and 'vile unions' are NOT the reasons our system of public education is in trouble. I am glad we have activists like madfloridian to keep reminding us that the current administration's reform efforts are both ill-conceived and politically motivated.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Nice post. It seemed to me as well that we were saying basically the same thing
as the report in many ways. I read parts of it again, and there is more in agreement with my stance than not.

Nice post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. Erik Hanyshek = Hoover Institution.
Edited on Sun Feb-06-11 02:02 AM by Hannah Bell
http://edpro.stanford.edu/hanushek/content.asp?ContentId=61

Hoover Institution:

Its mission statement outlines its basic tenets: representative government, private enterprise, peace, personal freedom, and the safeguards of the American system.<1>

The Hoover Institution is influential in the American conservative and libertarian movements.

The Institution has long been a place of scholarship for high-profile conservatives with government experience. A number of Hoover Institution fellows had connections to or held positions in the Bush administration and other Republican administrations. High-profile conservatives Edwin Meese, Condoleezza Rice, George Shultz, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, and Amy Zegart are all Hoover Institution fellows. Retired U.S. Army General John P. Abizaid, former commander of the U.S. Central Command, was recently named the Institution's first Annenberg Distinguished Visiting Fellow.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoover_Institution


Percentage of 25+ Year Olds Who Have Completed At Least 4 Years of High School, 1960-2000


1960 2000

Total 41.1 84.1

White 43.2 84.9

Black 20.1 78.5

Hispa NA 57.0

A/PI NA 85.7


Expenditure per pupil (2000 dollars)

1970: 4,427
2000: 8,787


Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1994 and 2001. Notes: NA stands for data not available.



Median Income and Poverty Level in 2000 Constant Dollars, 1965 to 2000

No high school diploma:
1965: 17,160
2000: 14,474

High school diploma:
1965: 20,991
2000: 21,395

Bachelor's degree:
1965: 30,409
2000: 39,835

Poverty threshold, four person family with two children
1965: 17,619
2000: 17,463

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. "Table P-16. Educational Attainment—People 25 Years Old and Over by Median Income and Sex: 1991 to 2000", "Table P-17. Years of School Completed—People 25 Years Old and Over by Median Income and Sex: 1958 to 1990.", and "Table 1. Weighted Average Poverty Thresholds for Families of Specified Size 1959 to 2000." Retrieved April 8, 2002 from http://www.census.gov.



Average Student Reading Proficiency Scores for 13 Year Olds, 1971-1999

Average score, overall:
1971: 255.2
1999: 259.4


Source: National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001.


Average Student Mathematics Proficiency Scores for 17 Year Olds, 1973-1999

1973: 304
2000: 308


Source: National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education. Digest of Education Statistics, 2001.


NCES 2010-013
April 2010

Chapter 2: Elementary and Secondary Education


The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), enacted in 1975, mandates that children and youth ages 3–21 with disabilities be provided a free and appropriate public school education. The percentage of total public school enrollment that represents children served by federally supported special education programs increased from 8.3 percent to 13.4 percent between 1976–77 and 2007–08 (table 50).

Much of this overall increase can be attributed to a rise in the percentage of students identified as having specific learning disabilities from 1976–77 (1.8 percent) to 1990–91 (5.2 percent).

Teachers and Other School Staff

During the 1970s and early 1980s, public school enrollment decreased, while the number of teachers generally increased. For public schools, the number of pupils per teacher—that is, the pupil/teacher ratio1 —declined from 22.3 in 1970 to 17.9 in 1985 (table 64 and figure 6).

Decreases have continued since then, and the public school pupil/teacher ratio was 15.5 in 2007.

By comparison, the pupil/teacher ratio for private schools was 13.0 in 2007.

The average class size in 2007–08 was 20.0 pupils for public elementary schools and 23.4 pupils for public secondary schools (table 67).

From 1969–70 to 1980, there was an 8 percent increase in the number of public school teachers, compared with a 48 percent increase in the number of all other public school staff2 (table B and table 80). From 1980 to 2007, the number of teachers and the number of all other staff grew at more similar rates (46 and 53 percent, respectively) than they did in the 1970s.

In 2007, there were 8 pupils per staff member (total staff) at public schools, compared with 10 pupils per staff member in 1980. At private schools in 2007, by comparison, the number of pupils per staff member was 7 (table 60).

High School Graduates and Dropouts

In 2006–07, an estimated 73.9 percent of public high school students graduated on time—that is, received a diploma 4 years after beginning their freshman year (table 105).

The percentage of dropouts among 16- to 24-year-olds has shown some decreases over the past 20 years. This percentage, known as the status dropout rate, includes all people in the 16- to 24-year-old age group who are not enrolled in school and who have not completed a high school program, regardless of when they left school. (People who left school but went on to receive a GED credential are not treated as dropouts.) Between 1988 and 2008, the status dropout rate declined from 12.9 to 8.0 percent (table 108).

Although the status dropout rate declined for both Blacks and Hispanics during this period, their rates (9.9 and 18.3 percent, respectively) remained higher than the rate for Whites (4.8 percent) in 2008. This measure is based on the civilian noninstitutionalized population, which excludes people in prisons, people in the military, and other people not living in households.

Achievement

Much of the student performance data in the Digest are drawn from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The NAEP assessments have been conducted using three basic designs: the national main NAEP, state NAEP, and long-term trend NAEP.

The main NAEP reports current information for the nation and specific geographic regions of the country. The assessment program includes students drawn from both public and nonpublic schools and reports results for student achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12.

Since 1990, NAEP assessments have also been conducted at the state level. In its content, the state assessment is identical to the assessment conducted nationally.

NAEP long-term trend assessments are designed to give information on the changes in the basic achievement level of America’s youth since the early 1970s. They are administered nationally and report student performance in reading and mathematics at ages 9, 13, and 17. Measuring long-term trends of student achievement requires the precise replication of past procedures...The differences in procedures between the main NAEP and the long-term trend NAEP mean that their results cannot be compared directly.

Reading

Reported on a scale of 0 to 500, NAEP long-term trend results in reading are available for 12 assessment years going back to the first in 1971.

The average reading score for 9-year-olds was higher in 2008 than in all previous assessment years, increasing 4 points since 2004 and 12 points in comparison to 1971 (table 116). While the average score for 13-year-olds in 2008 was higher than in both 2004 and 1971, it was not significantly different from the scores in some assessment years in between. The average reading score for 17-year-olds was higher in 2008 than in 2004 but was not significantly different from the score in 1971.

White, Black, and Hispanic 9-, 13-, and 17-year-olds all had higher average reading scores in 2008 than they did in the first assessment year (which is 1975 for Hispanic students because separate data for Hispanics were not collected in 1971).

At age 9, White, Black, and Hispanic students scored higher in 2008, on average, than in any previous assessment year. In comparison to 2004, average reading scores were higher in 2008 for White students at all three ages, for Black students at ages 9 and 13, and for Hispanic students at age 9. Reading results for 2008 continued to show gaps in scores between White and Black students (ranging from 21 to 29 points, depending on age) and between White and Hispanic students (ranging from 21 to 26 points). From 2004 to 2008, no significant changes were seen in these reading score gaps. However, the White-Black reading gap was smaller in 2008 than in 1971 at all three ages, and the White-Hispanic reading gap narrowed at ages 9 and 17 in comparison to 1975.

In 2008, female students continued to have higher average reading scores than male students at all three ages. The gap between male and female 9-year-olds was 7 points in 2008; this was not significantly different from the gap in 2004 but was narrower than the gap in 1971.

The 8-point gender gap for 13-year-olds in 2008 was not significantly different from the gaps in either 2004 or in 1971. At age 17, the 11-point gap between males and females in 2008 was not significantly different from the gaps in any of the previous assessment years.


Mathematics

NAEP long-term trend mathematics results, reported on a scale of 0 to 500, are available for 11 assessment years, going back to the first in 1973.

Average mathematics scores for 9- and 13-year-olds were higher in 2008 than in all previous assessment years (table 132).

The average score for 9-year-olds in 2008 was 4 points higher than in 2004 and 24 points higher than in 1973. For 13-year-olds, the average score in 2008 was 3 points higher than in 2004 (based on unrounded scores) and 15 points higher than in 1973. In contrast, the average score for 17-year-olds in 2008 was not significantly different from the scores in 2004 and 1973.

White, Black, and Hispanic 9-, 13-, and 17-year-olds all had higher average mathematics scores in 2008 than in 1973.

In comparison to 2004, average mathematics scores were higher in 2008 for White students at age 9. From 2004 to 2008, there were no significant changes in scores for 9-, 13-, and 17-year-old Black and Hispanic students or for 13- and 17-year-old White students. Mathematics results for 2008 continued to show score gaps between White and Hispanic students (ranging from 16 to 23 points, depending on age) and between White and Black students (ranging from 26 to 28 points). Across all three age groups, neither the White-Black gap nor the White-Hispanic gap in mathematics scores changed significantly from 2004 to 2008, but both were smaller in 2008 than in 1973.

While there was no significant difference between the average mathematics scores of male and female 9-year-olds in 2008, male students did score higher than female students at ages 13 and 17. At age 13, the 4-point gap between males and females in 2008 was not significantly different when compared to the gap in 2004, but it was larger than the gap in 1973. At age 17, the 5-point gender score gap in 2008 was not significantly different from the gaps in previous assessment years.


Science

NAEP has assessed the science abilities of students in grades 4, 8, and 12 since 1996, using a separate scale of 0 to 300 for each grade. From 1996 to 2005, the national average 4th-grade science score increased from 147 to 151, there was no measurable change in the 8th-grade score, and the 12th-grade score decreased from 150 to 147 (table 140). Certain subgroups outperformed others in science in 2005. For example, males outperformed females at all three grades. White students scored higher, on average, than Black and Hispanic students at all three grades in 2005. At 4th grade, average scores were higher for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander students in 2005 than in 1996. At 8th grade, the average score for Black students was higher in 2005 than in 1996, but no measurable increases occurred for other racial/ethnic groups from 1996 to 2005. At 12th grade, there were no measurable changes in average scores for any racial/ethnic group when comparing results from 2005 with those from 1996. Asian/Pacific Islander 4th-graders’ results from 2000 are not included because reporting standards were not met.

Skills of Young Children

In addition to student performance data available through NAEP, the Digest presents data from other surveys to provide additional perspectives on student achievement. Differences among demographic groups in the acquisition of mental skills have been demonstrated at relatively early ages (table 112).

A higher percentage of females (69 percent) demonstrated expressive vocabulary than males (59 percent).

Also, a higher percentage of White 2-year-olds (71 percent) demonstrated expressive vocabulary than Black, Hispanic, or American Indian/Alaska Native 2-year-olds (56, 54, and 50 percent, respectively).

The percentage of 2-year-olds from families with high socioeconomic status (SES) who demonstrated expressive vocabulary (75 percent) was higher than the percentage of children from low-SES families who did so (52 percent).

Similar patterns of differences were observed by race/ethnicity and SES for children at about 4 years of age (table 113). White (14.2) and Asian (17.5) 48- to 57-month-old children had higher literacy scores than Black (12.0), Hispanic (10.7), and American Indian/Alaska Native (9.6) children.

Also, high-SES children (18.0) had higher average literacy scores than low-SES children (9.2). These same patterns were observed among 48- to 57-month-old children with respect to average mathematics scores.

Coursetaking in High School

The average number of science and mathematics courses completed by public high school graduates increased between 1982 and 2005. The average number of mathematics courses (Carnegie units) completed in high school rose from 2.6 in 1982 to 3.7 in 2005, and the number of science courses rose from 2.2 to 3.3 (table 149). The average number of courses in career/technical areas completed by all high school graduates was lower in 2005 (4.0 units) than in 1982 (4.6 units). As a result of the increased academic course load, the percentage of students completing the 1983 National Commission on Excellence recommendations for college-bound students (4 units of English, 3 units of social studies, 3 units of science, 3 units of mathematics, 2 units of foreign language, and .5 units of computer science) rose from 2 percent in 1982 to 36 percent in 2005 (table 153).

School Violence

In 2007–08, about 85 percent of public schools had a criminal incident, which is defined as a serious violent crime or a less serious crime such as a fight without weapons, theft, or vandalism (table 159). The percentage of schools having a criminal incident in 2007–08 was about the same as the percentage in 1999–2000 (86 percent).

In 2007–08, some 75 percent of schools reported one or more violent incidents, 47 percent of schools reported one or more thefts/larcenies, and 67 percent reported other types of incidents. Overall, there were 4 criminal incidents reported per 100 students.

Revenues and Expenditures

The state share of revenues for public elementary and secondary schools generally grew from the 1930s through the mid-1980s, while the local share declined during the same time period (table 172 and figure 9).

However, this pattern changed in the late 1980s, when the local share began to increase at the same time the state share decreased. Between 1986–87 and 1993–94, the state share declined from 49.7 percent to 45.2 percent, while the local share rose from 43.9 percent to 47.8 percent.

Between 1993–94 and 2000–01, the state share rose again to 49.7 percent, the highest share since 1986–87, but declined every school year thereafter until 2005–06, when the state share was 46.5 percent.

Between 1995–96 and 2005–06, the federal share of revenues rose from 6.6 to 9.1 percent. The local share declined from 45.9 percent in 1995–96 to 42.8 in 2002–03 and then increased each year, reaching 44.4 percent in 2005–06.

Between 2005–06 and 2006–07, these patterns shifted. The federal percentage declined from 9.1 to 8.5 percent and the local percentage declined from 44.4 to 43.9 percent. In contrast, the state percentage rose from 46.5 to 47.6 percent.

After adjustment for inflation, current expenditures per student in fall enrollment at public schools rose during the 1980s, remained stable during the first part of the 1990s, and rose again after 1992–93 (table 182 and figure 10).

There was an increase of 37 percent from 1980–81 to 1990–91; a change of less than 1 percent from 1990–91 to 1994–95 (which resulted from small decreases at the beginning of this period, followed by small increases after 1992–93); and an increase of 29 percent from 1994–95 to 2006–07.

In 2006–07, current expenditures per student in fall enrollment were $9,683 in unadjusted dollars. In 2006–07, some 56 percent of students in public schools were transported at public expense at a cost of $779 per pupil, also in unadjusted dollars (table 176).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 The pupil/teacher ratio is based on all teachers—including teachers for students with disabilities and other special teachers—and all students enrolled in the fall of the school year. Unlike the pupil/teacher ratio, the average class size excludes students and teachers in classes that are exclusively for special education students. Class size averages are based on surveys of teachers reporting on the counts of students in their classes.

2 "All other public school staff" includes administrative staff, principals, librarians, guidance counselors, secretaries, custodial staff, food service workers, school bus drivers, and other professional and nonprofessional staff.

NCESProductsTables 1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)Statistical Standards|FedStats.gov

http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/ch_2.asp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Is there a particular point you're trying to highlight in the data you posted?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. Another rec for another great OP
Reading Teacherken's quite relevant questions ("Where are the voices of parents?" "Where are the voices of those actually teaching?"), I am compelled to add:

WHERE ARE THE VOICES OF OUR CHILDREN?!?

Our education reform du jour perpetuates our species' tendency to disrespect our children. Furthermore, we continue to project our perceptions and our 'solutions' onto our children, without once soliciting input from them.

We are not now, nor have we ever been a child-centric society. However, truly successful teachers step way outside that box, and extend love and respect to our children, earning the same back from them a thousand-fold.

Sad, really, that someone like Arne Duncan--or Michelle Rhee--has ANY kind of authority over our children...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. Trust a man that still can't make a fully functioning OS. After decades.
After all these years...Windows 7 still locks up as easy as WinME did. Yet, we are expected to let idiots like Bill control huge parts of the American system? No thanks, go fix your shitty OS. No wonder Apple finally caught up!

Can't fix his own crap...so he goes out and shits on everyone else. Typical.

Hey Bill, just beg for a cabinet seat and destroy whatever department you hate like the rest of them! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
33. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. K&R-corporate muscle with their cookie cutter solutions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
37. What a horrible model
"The attacks on teachers and unions are not about educational reform, but turning the teaching profession into a service industry"

Is there a 'service industry' anywhere where the service doesn't suck, the product doesn't suck, and it isn't wildly overpriced for what you actually receive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC