Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woot! Gobama! Estate Measure Creates Window to Give Children Up To $10 Million Tax-Free!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:14 PM
Original message
Woot! Gobama! Estate Measure Creates Window to Give Children Up To $10 Million Tax-Free!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-14/estate-measure-creates-window-to-give-children-up-to-10-million-tax-free.html

Families would be able to make tax- free gifts to their children or others of as much as $10 million, an increase from the current limit of $2 million, under the tax-cut bill Congress is debating this week.

Beginning in 2011, an individual U.S. taxpayer’s lifetime gift-tax exclusion will jump to $5 million, up from $1 million currently, according to the legislation. Gifts from living parents allow taxpayers to transfer assets such as cash, stocks or shares of a business to their kids and let the value grow outside of the couple’s estate, said Jim Cundiff, an estate planning attorney with McDermott Will & Emery, who’s based in Chicago. Unifying the estate and gift tax exemptions is one of the biggest benefits in the measure, he said.

“You could transfer $10 million next year without paying any tax,” Cundiff said. “That’s a big tax-free gift. This benefit evaporates in two years, so take it while you can.” Parents may use trusts to give the money to descendants if they’re concerned about giving a lot of money directly to their children, he said.

Senate leaders released an agreement on Dec. 9 crafted by President Barack Obama and Republicans to keep existing tax rates through 2012 that also included the changes to estate and gift taxes. The bill, which is scheduled for a vote this week, sets a $5 million threshold for an individual or $10 million for a couple for both estate and gift-tax levies, with a top tax rate of 35 percent. The provisions would expire at the end of 2012, according to the legislation.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remind me again, why that is good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because it helps the more fortunate ...
'tis the season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Sainted Barack ObamaClaus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm really glad to see that we're doing something to help
those poor little waifs whose inheritances will be less than 10 million. I mean, how would you like to be in line to inherit a paltry 9 million and the cruel gobmint comes along and wants to take some of it from you? I ask you, does that seem fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. except Obama got it to go to 35% instead of staying at 0
Wonder how much tax free they would have gotten then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't confuse me with the facts!
Yes that is why we hear so much bitching from Republicans about this.

Sure it could be higher, but 35% is a lot higher than 0%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Avoid the 35%
by transferring the wealth to the kids and into trusts before the Grim Reaper comes for Scrooge McDuck.
The tax attorneys for the elderly wealthy will stash that loot before paying any 35% tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Don't confuse me with the facts!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. "The rich are not like you and I,......" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes, they have more money...
And less scruples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. There was no estate tax at all this entire year regardless of income
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 12:33 PM by stray cat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. this is a higher one-time limit for the GIFT tax, not the estate tax
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 02:05 PM by unblock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Yeah, but a one year boondoggle that is expiring and going old school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gotta love it. Protecting the millionaires at all costs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yayyy! More Paris Hiltons!
Just what this country needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bet alot of those tbaggers will make good use of this........... NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
those stupid maroons..out marching and screaming for tax breaks for the rich..while they are barely making ends meet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cool! Now where can I find the $30 million? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. What a relief. Right now the east wing of my summer estate is crowded with pallets of $100 bills.
This really takes a load off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Tax-free? Only for the trust fund brats.
My kids will have to pay off their deficit in taxes for the next 50 years, but who's paying attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supertruck97 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
21. Anyone care to explain WHY estates should be taxed again at death/gifting?
Take a simple example:

I earn $100 at a job.

Government taxes it at the 35% rate.

That leaves me with $65.

I buy $65 worth of goods, paying a 6.5% sales tax, leaving me with goods worth $60.7.

Then I die, and I give those goods to my kids.

Explain why it's OK for the government to take ANOTHER bite out of that apple at 35%?

If I only give $60.7 worth of stuff to my kids, the government has already taken 39+% out of my earned income.

Now, with another 35% taken out of the 60.7, that leaves my kids with only $39.45 worth of stuff (35% of 60.7 is 21 and change).

So at that point, out of the $100 I originally, my kids only get to keep less than 40% of it.

Explain how that is fair???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC