Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Privatization of Heathrow blamed for the mess

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:23 PM
Original message
Privatization of Heathrow blamed for the mess
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 06:24 PM by emsimon33
As I sit stranded in London because Heathrow can't seem to deal with the cold and snow, I am pleased to learn that the mayor of London is blaming the mess that has continued at Heathrow on the fact that the for-profit Spanish company that now owns Heathrow did not spend the money necessary to be able to handle weather like London has experienced the past few days.

I hope that the real cause of the mess at Heathrow makes the U.S. press so that Americans will think twice before they sell everything off to the highest for-profit bidder:


"BAA, the operator at Heathrow, owned all the big airports in southern England. BAA’s owner, the Spanish Ferrovial, had borrowed heavily to buy the airport operator. It had big debts to service. Thus BAA shunned investment in basic infrastructure in favour of quick profits. The only real money spent on Heathrow went on expanding the terminals’ lucrative retail concessions...."

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c2aa45c-0c75-11e0-8408-00144feabdc0.html#axzz18jDgHyR7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heh. "Britain shamed by Heathrow's terminal mess."
At least their papers are a little less ashamed to call it like it is (a mess...created by corrupt corporations.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. gosh, I hope you get out of there soon
It does seem ridiculous. London, of all places, is likely to get snow--it isn't as if it is in the tropics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. This is what happens when profits are the only motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. London very rarely gets much snow
This is the worst snow that London has seen in about 20 years. Britain as a whole doesn't as much snow or cold weather as other countries on the same latitude thanks to the gulf stream & the sea (though we don't get as hot in summer either), London gets even less snow largely due to urban warming so they tend to panic if they get an inch of snow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Snow is trickling down - fuck the neo-liberals.
The good news is that the Chambers of Commerce have shot themselves in the foot supporting all the crazy privatization. The bad news is that lots of people won't make it home for Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. just saw the mayor on nbc...'i don't control the airports.......yet'
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 06:45 PM by spanone
privatization is ONLY about profit. doing the right thing seems to not be the option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Habibi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Saw that NBC report too.
Is it true that the airport shut down over *5 inches* of snow??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Or less...yes
With Heathrow so easily disabled, I don't see how London got the Olympics.

The major streets are clear in London but they can't seem to get Heathrow cleared. My flight to Zurich today was canceled. I grew up on Virginia Beach, VA, and this little bit of snow that Lonson experienced would have been cleared from Norfolk Airport in a day or less. This is a real crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. They shunned investment in infrastructure for quick profits?
Nobody could have foreseen that!

God, this just gets so depressing whenever a public accommodation gets turned into a would-be profit center. If running an airport was so damned lucrative, you'd see private airports springing up everywhere. But running and maintaining a major airport isn't profitable enough to run as a private enterprise, which is why it has to be subsidized through all kinds of taxes, levies and surcharges, visible and not-so-visible. As we see with Heathrow, when the choice comes down to servicing its corporate debt or making airport improvements, Ferrovial is going to make sure its creditors are happy and travelers can go hang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yep, you nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. No! Have faith in the invisible hand!
It will right all! :sarcasm: Somehow those free market "fixes" never *do* get around to doing what its priests insist it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder if it's the same Spanish company that purchased the Indiana Turnpike?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I'm thinking it's "leased" for 99 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. My beloved (no snark) DEMOCRATIC Gov. Rendell wanted to "lease" our Turnpike to Spaniards, also.
Edited on Tue Dec-21-10 10:17 AM by WinkyDink
We nipped THAT one in the proverbial bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emsimon33 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Good thing that you did or when it snowed
they probably would not have invested in snow removal equipment and supplies because making obscene profits are more important than human lives.

When are people in the US going to wake up and realize that they are the government but they have to stand up and let this truth be known! Government is only as good as the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. such a longstanding pattern, I don't know why people aren't WISE TO IT YET!
Buy a corp using debt, buy more assets & run up more debt using the corp assets as collateral, let the existing operations & assets run down & go to hell, declare bankruptcy, sell off the assets for a song to your cronies, & get off scot-free.

this is the plan for public assets also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC