Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters Factbox: Winners/Losers from U.S. Internet Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:48 PM
Original message
Reuters Factbox: Winners/Losers from U.S. Internet Rules
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 09:49 PM by Hissyspit
http://us.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BK08120101221?ca=rdt

Factbox: Potential winners/losers from U.S. Internet rules
Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:58pm EST

(Reuters) - The Federal Communications Commission is expected to adopt Internet traffic rules on Tuesday. They would ban the blocking of lawful content, but allow high-speed Internet providers to manage their networks. Wireless carriers got additional network management freedoms.

The following are expected winners and losers under this framework based on reports from analysts and industry insiders.

INTERNET PROVIDERS - WINNERS

* Cable companies like Comcast Corp, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision Systems Corp and big landline providers like AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc

* The rules will not stand in the way of usage-based pricing, allowing cable and other fixed line companies that also serve as high-speed Internet providers to increase rates for subscribers that do bandwidth-heavy tasks.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. This represents the death of the Internet, not just "rules".
Take it Anon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well I guess I should not be surprised
here a cave, there a cave, everywhere a cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Really?
I guess it's over then. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. we are SO screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. But I thought our Soshalist President would soshalize the internet into a Government run program.
I don't get it, this sounds almost pro - big business. I'm going to have to tune into Sean and Glenn tomorrow to get a clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if this will spawn a new breed of denial of service attacks...
If hackers will find ways to get off-shore servers to hammer these "protected" services of these companies trying to close the internet to themselves. Perhaps these other servers could bring down effective responsiveness of these servers "protected" by Comcast, etc. with such attacks. Since the bandwidth wouldn't be used by subscribers directly, and with these attackers being able to go through other connections, it wouldn't be something that could be directly billed to customers. I can see this sort of thing happening soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC