Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Jesse in Wisconsin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:00 AM
Original message
On Jesse in Wisconsin
“There were actually twenty-one primaries and caucuses altogether on that day, March 8 (1988), Jackson ran ran first or second in sixteen of them. In the South, he finished first in five states and second in nine others, winning 27 percent of the popular vote, more than anyone else, and claiming almost a third of the region's delegates. In fact, when the day was over, Jackson had actually become the overall leader in popular votes in the Democratic presidential primary campaign.” (page 391)

“....Jackson had finished second with 7 million votes – 29 percent of the total cast, and about equal, actually, to Mondale's count in 1984. Moreover, some 2 million of those votes had come this time from whites, almost as many as had gone to Gore, Gephardt, and Babbit put together.” (pages 400-401)
--Jesse; Marshall Frady; Random House; 1996


I was reading some accounts of the battle in Wisconsin this morning, when I came upon a right-wing account that caught my attention. Briefly, it called the demonstrators “criminals,” and stated that they were so desperate that they “dragged Jesse Jackson out of obscurity” to address their crowds. I will not provide a link to that story, as I would prefer that it sink into obscurity. Yet, unintentionally, it raises some important points.

Among his many accomplishments, Jesse twice ran in the Democratic presidential primaries. In 1984, his campaign was conducted as a revival, and culminated in his powerful call to the conscience of America, at the Democratic National Convention. Older forum members will recall that New York's Governor Mario Cuomo gave an intense speech about the divide in America, challenging Reagan's “City on the Hill” illusion. And then, Jesse delivered the Word, in what many consider the greatest speech given at any national convention.

Four years more of “Reaganomics” and the criminal conspiracies of “Iran-Contra” substituting as foreign policy had turned the sod across the country, making it possible for the most serious presidential run by a true progressive in a the past 40 years. In contrast to his '84 run, which sought to increase the numbers of black citizens registered to vote, the 1988 run was a solid political campaign. Jackson's platform is worth reviewing. The major issues included:

Instituting a WPA program, to put Americans to work rebuilding the nation's infrastructure;
Reversing the Reagan tax-cuts for the obscenely wealthy;
Changing the focus of the “war on drugs” to target the banks that laundered big drug monies;
Cutting military spending by 15%;
Creating a single-payer universal health care system;
Ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment;
Increasing funding for education;
Making community colleges free;
Reviving FDR-era supports for family farms;
Enforcing the Voting Rights Act;
Changing the policies that supported foreign dictators, and encouraging democratic efforts.
Respect for unions.

When the economic and social problems were worsening in the towns and cities of America, citizens were more open to supporting a progressive candidate. One of the most important lessons from 1988 involves how the other democratic primary candidates joined together to stop Jesse Jackson's momentum. They used the excuse that Jesse “couldn't win” the general election. So what did they do? They coordinated an effort to promote Michael Dukakis.

I'm not anti-Dukakis. I believe that he was, in essence, a good man. But at a time when the Democratic Party was going to run a candidate against George Bush the Elder – who was rightly or wrongly perceived as a prissy poodle – the heads of the Democratic Party put forth the one candidate who made Bush appear strong in comparison. And Bush destroyed Dukakis in the general election.

For many Americans, the 2008 presidential election appeared to present another progressive candidate, Senator Barack Obama. Unlike the right-wing, which used a melanin meter to measure Obama, the democratic left was encouraged that Obama had drank from the same well that had nourished past progressives of all colors.

Yet, the past two years have not brought about the level of change needed to repair the wounds inflicted by the Bush-Cheney era. It's not a question of if Obama is better than McCain, or Biden superior to Palin. It's about the quality of life that people deserve and expected.

So, again, we are at a time when many people are open to hearing the message of a man like Jesse Jackson. They recognize that we need progressive change in America, and that this type of change cannot come from the current crop of elected officials in Washington, DC. At least not from their sense of fairness and good will.

This is what the revolutionary change can and should be in the United States. That is the ultimate goal of the demonstrations in Wisconsin today. Our situation, while similar to that facing people in lands such as Egypt, is distinct. We can bring about meaningful change within the existing system, by changing the make up of the government. We face many stumbling blocks: corporations, republicans, and yes, even many of the business-as-usual career politicians in Washington and in our state capitals.

But we can unite groups and individuals for a common purpose. That is, after all, the very purpose of unions. And we can, like Jesse in the years between 1984 and '88, bring a large number of individuals who are not registered to vote, nor engaged in the political process, into the picture.

Alone, we are like individual fingers, which our enemy can easily twist and break. United, we form a powerful fist that is capable of protecting us all.

Peace,
H2O Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was just thinking about his '88 campaign this morning.
Thanks for the refresher. It was a great platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. When you think
about most of what the progressive/liberal members of this forum want, it's in that '88 platform. When you think of what our moderate/conservative forum friends oppose, it's what the other primary contenders opposed Jesse for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This picture got me thinking about it:


What struck me is that Jesse isn't looking Rahm in the eye. I took it as an illustration of the divide between them, and the kind of Democrats they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good photo.
Is is symbolic of the divide in character, isn't it?

I used to have respect for Rahm. I believed he wanted the power to help others. But it seems like he has become intoxicated with power, something that is fairly common.

Jesse also likes power. But he tends to use it to help those in the margins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Jesse's tendency (as I saw it) to desire
attention and power was always a source of hesitance for me. I also had at earlier times the same reaction to Al Sharpton (apologies if the comparison seems unfair), but in both cases, their legacies will be good ones of principled defenders of the under-represented and disempowered.

Sometimes, not winning power may in fact empower the principled voice, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Right.
I remember in the 1988 campaign, when a journalist questioned him about that, Jesse responding, "Well, you wouldn't want a president with an inferiority complex, would you?"

Much of that behavior, I believe, was rooted in his childhood. He was always an outsider, looking in. And always trying to prove he deserved to be allowed in.

I can see how it appears similar to Rev. Sharpton. Add to that the fact that both were the last person the other democratic candidates wanted included in the debates. They had similar styles in that context. I enjoyed watching Sharpton in the debates, but never considered supporting him as a candidate for president. On the other hand, despite his flaws, I fully supported Jesse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Among his many accomplishments was coming to OH after the '04 theft
When MSM and most of the Democratic Party turned their backed on low income voters disenfranchised at the hands of the GOP, Rev Jackson sought to bring attention to our outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I remember that.
Jesse Jackson is, of course, not perfect. But his record as a social/political activist is outstanding.

(I'm waiting on a few more answers for my February DU interview. I may try Jesse for March.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. interesting about Jesse and Wisconsin
In 1988, I was living in Wisconsin, and voted in the primary for Jesse. At the time I was thinking that if Jesse had won in Wisconsin that he would win the nomination.

Instead Dukakis won big in Wisconsin, kind of derailing Jesse's campaign. As wiki writes "On the heels of Jackson's narrow loss to Dukakis the day before in Colorado, Dukakis' comfortable win in Wisconsin terminated Jackson's momentum. The victory established Dukakis as the clear Democratic frontrunner, and he went on to claim the party's nomination, but lost the general election in November." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson#1988_presidential_campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Jesse was the
front-runner, in a tight race, going into New York. The coordinated effort to remove him from that position had already been in effect. By NY, the only other person besides Jesse and Dukakis was Al Gore.

Now, I like Al Gore. But he wasn't always the person has became. In the NY primary, he agreed to serve as the attack dog. His unofficial partner in that effort was Mayor Ed Koch. Together, the pair focused entirely on damaging Jesse's reputation. Gore wasn't promoting his own case. Just attacking Jesse. Then, he dropped out after the primary.

So, going into Wisconsin, it was Jesse vs Dukakis on paper, but in reality, it had become Jesse vs the pack. And Dukakis won Wisconsin, and the nomination.

It put Dukakis in an uncomfortable position. He started with a large lead over VP Bush. But there were divisions in Dukakis's camp: would he be better off if he separated completely from Jesse? If he courted Jesse's support, but make clear early on that there was no way Jesse would be considered for the ticket? Or should he actually consider Jesse as a possible VP?

Of course, Dukakis -- who did not like Jesse as a person -- knew he would be overshadowed with Jackson on the ticket. He wanted Jesse's support, but could not bring himself to ask for it. And both his advisors and Dukakis led Jackson on, telling him he was being given serious consideration -- even though he wasn't.

During the fall campaign, Jesse traveled more miles campaigning for the democratic ticket than Dukakis and Bentson combined. In many ways, Bentson appeared a safer VP choice than did Jackson. But only Jesse could have given Dukakis the strength necessary for campaigning against the filthy tactics of the republican machine.

Interestingly, the numbers that Jackson added to the voter registration roles would allow Bill Clinton and Al Gore to win in '92.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. mp3 of Jessie's 1984 speech..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thank you.
I love that speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Jackson even spoke in Janesville WI during his campaign.
No one ever came to speak in Janesville even though we were a GM UAW town and we managed to produce both Russ Feingold *and Paul Ryan. It's a wild world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Jesse stuck with us
in 1977, with the Hurricane Defense Fund. It was at a time when our efforts had gone out of style; most supporters abandoned our effort. Jesse and Muhammad Ali stuck with us. I'll never forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. That's Jesse. He will go to the people anywhere.
Whether it be a small town in an election or to a manufacturing plant in rural America to support exploited workers or to urban rallies. I always gave him kudos for being consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. I just posted Jesse's 1988 speech in Political Videos.
It's a fantastic speech, esp. for when one finds it hard to remember what a Democrat sounds like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Great speech.
The campaign platform that I listed in the OP is an outline of what a democrat should sound like. And both the '84 and '88 speeches are as true today, as they were when he delivered them. They stand in sharp contrast to the weak elected officials who are supposed to be representing our interests these days.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. "I would rather have FDR in a wheelchair than Reagan on a horse."
Classic line, isn't it?

KICK

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. As usual, you make me think.
As a younger man, I campaigned for Jesse Jackson in 1984.

It wasn't easy to knock on doors promoting Jesse in my all-white town but I did.

1984 and 2011 are light-years apart. As many who are growing older, I wonder where all the time went.

At that time I was more idealistic than today. But I remain hopeful.

Keep hope alive, as he'd say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. This bears repeating:
It's not a question of if Obama is better than McCain, or Biden superior to Palin. It's about the quality of life that people deserve and expected.

That's it exactly. This shouldn't be a race to the bottom, we should be trying to uplift our fellow brothers and sisters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Jesse is heads and shoulders above most Democrats
especially the current crop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. Bravo, Dear Sir K&R (w/props especially for "melanin meter")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
24. I voted for him in the Primary. Met him, shook his hand. Still proud of all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. I always voted for Jackson in the primary . . .
he is a progressive soldier - from civil rights to domestic violence to unions - he is always there. He was up in Maine when the paper mills were trying to bust the unions and in Washington for the march against violence against women and in Florida to protest the bogus election results in 2000 and with Martin Luther King, Jr., in the civil rights movement.

I named my son Jesse after him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. The real question is, could ANYONE on the Democratic side won in 1988,
Imagine what the "Willie Horton" ad's would have looked like. It WOULD have been horrible. The only reason we won in 1992 was because Ross Perot spent a brazillion dollars to chew Bush 41's feet off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC