|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:34 PM Original message |
Is it legal to impersonate somebody and tape the phone call? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DonCoquixote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. If he does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. OMG, trouble? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled that he did it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not sure but you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drokhole (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. If so, I'd hate to be the Jerky Boys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Satire always gets a free pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. The FBI and police departments across the country pose as drug dealers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I know, but we all know about the double standards there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. find out state law. some areas, only one need know there is a recording |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Yep. That's what I've been told............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. So did the Accorn Attack fake pimp, secret tape guy get into trouble? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I think the taping of phone calls is different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. Depends on the state laws. In WI, it's OK to tape a phone call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Well what made me think of it was the new legislation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Does that have to do with screwing people out of money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I think it was in response to the woman who harassed that girl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Without looking it up, I'd say that the "intent" has a good deal to do with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. "speaks American". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #31 |
38. No, his real name is Peggy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillowTree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why would it not be legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. In many states you can't record a telephone conversation without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. In some you need the consent of only 1. Need to check your state laws. Look in phone book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
66 dmhlt (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. CONSENT: 12 states require ALL parties; 38 states require ONE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. In NY, only one party to a conversation needs to consent to have it recorded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sonoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Bingo! Texas is the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's social engineering, not illegal, could cause a long, complex, likely useless lawsuit n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. From what I'm reading about "social engineering" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. That's why I left a bit of room open for a lawsuit. It gets messy, and here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
19. I've never heard that it's illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
24. Remember when Palin took the phony call from Sarkozy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Good Call! Did the fake Sarkozy get into trouble? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
26. Oh, you mean in the land of NSA wiretapping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
30. Mr. Murphy welcomes the trouble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
32. Who gives a damn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speltwon (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-23-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. Depends on the state. This law, like most criminal law - varies. In my state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
36. he didn't claim he was billionaire David Koch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 09:53 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. That's like calling.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
37. Not in AZ it's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
39. In most states, recording a phone call is legal as long as one party consents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrmpa (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-24-11 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
40. some quick research I did found that New York and Kansas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC