Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Effort To Replace Slurred Gravestones Blocked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:34 PM
Original message
Effort To Replace Slurred Gravestones Blocked
Effort To Replace Slurred Gravestones Blocked
February 23, 2011 11:48 PM

EL DORADO HILLS, Calif. (CBS13) — A serious mistake by the government more than a half century ago led to dozens of graves being engraved with a racial slur, but an effort by a local Eagle Scout to replace the markers has been blocked.

Joshua Michael, 15, said he spent hundreds of hours raising money to buy replacement headstones for the graves of 36 unidentified remains resting in an El Dorado County cemetery, but he wasn’t expecting so much resistance. He even secured a $20,000 grant from AT&T to buy new markers.

“I didn’t think we were rewriting history, I thought we were righting a wrong,” Joshua said.

In 1954, 8 cemeteries that were about to be flooded by the construction of the Folsom Dam were moved to El Dorado County, including three dozen graves from Negro Hill.

The Army Corps of Engineers replaced “negro” with the n-word.

more...
http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/02/23/effort-to-replace-slurred-gravestones-blocked/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hatred runs deep in this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Change the gravestones of the loved ones of those against the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very interesting. I wonder if, in 1954, that other cemetery
was known as N-word Hill. I'm guessing that it was. It shouldn't have been, but it very well might have been in 1954. I was around in 1954, and such things weren't uncommon.

If so, then the issue is a little more complicated, historically.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Doing some research, it appears that the place in California was
historically called by both names at one time or another, depending on who referred to it. It was a historic gold mining area. I say change the markers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Good point. There used to be a lot of offensive place names in this country.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. It sounds like the person who's fighting the change wants an investigation
of WHY the gravestones had the slur engraved on them, and is concerned that changing them would destroy the evidence. Also, from what I read in the link he seemed to be concerned that simply changing the headstones would have the effect of sweeping the incident under the rug. I'm not necessarily agreeing with the guy, but it may not be as simply as it looks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I heard of a similar Eagle Scout project where a scout wanted to repair a damaged
Civil War era graveyard at a Church. His project was denied since the County claimed that he would have to contact the living relatives of all people interred there to get permission before proceeding. The "newest" grave in the cemetery was 1860 something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC