Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Really Bad Reporting in Wisconsin: Who 'Contributes' to Public Workers' Pensions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:46 PM
Original message
Really Bad Reporting in Wisconsin: Who 'Contributes' to Public Workers' Pensions?
How not to sound stupid about Wisconsin:

http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/UBEN-8EDJYS?OpenDocument

David Cay Johnston

. . .

Gov. Scott Walker says he wants state workers covered by collective bargaining agreements to "contribute more" to their pension and health insurance plans.

Accepting Gov. Walker' s assertions as fact, and failing to check, created the impression that somehow the workers are getting something extra, a gift from taxpayers. They are not.

Out of every dollar that funds Wisconsin' s pension and health insurance plans for state workers, 100 cents comes from the state workers.

How can that be? Because the "contributions" consist of money that employees chose to take as deferred wages – as pensions when they retire – rather than take immediately in cash. The same is true with the health care plan. If this were not so a serious crime would be taking place, the gift of public funds rather than payment for services.

Thus, state workers are not being asked to simply "contribute more" to Wisconsin' s retirement system (or as the argument goes, "pay their fair share" of retirement costs as do employees in Wisconsin' s private sector who still have pensions and health insurance). They are being asked to accept a cut in their salaries so that the state of Wisconsin can use the money to fill the hole left by tax cuts and reduced audits of corporations in Wisconsin.

. . . more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, are they going to pay taxes on this deferred comp? And if so, when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. At the same time those with 401k's pay taxes on their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't quite follow. When is the tax on the deferred comp for health insurance going to
be assessed? My 401k doesn't have a provision for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The OP says they take deferred comp for retirement *and* health care. (see below)
If that's the case, and deferred comp taxes must be paid at some point. When and how is the deferred comp tax paid for the value of the health benefit?

How can that be? Because the "contributions" consist of money that employees chose to take as deferred wages – as pensions when they retire – rather than take immediately in cash. The same is true with the health care plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The author mentions the taxes here...
Traditional or defined benefit pension plans, properly administered, increase economic efficiency, while the newer defined contribution plans have high costs whether done one at a time through Individual Retirement Accounts or in group plans like 401(k)s.

Efficiency means that more of the money workers contribute to their pensions - - money that could have been taken as cash wages today - - ends up in the pockets of retirees, not securities dealers, trustees and others who administer and invest the money. Compared to defined benefit pension plans, 401(k) plans are vastly more expensive in investing, administration and other costs.

Individually managed accounts like 401(k)s violate a basic tenet of economics – specialization increases economic gains. That is why the average investor makes much less than the market return, studies by Morningstar show.


This was an outstanding article about how the media is relying on the slanted talking points of their contacts rather than asking the right questions ("who contributes" to the state of Wisconsin' s pension & health care plans; & how elected officials are treated by the pension system) & checking & re-checking the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I understand how the 401k is deferrred - standard really. But
I'm still waiting for an explanation of how the deferred comp for the health benefit is handled. If it is *truly* deferred comp, then taxes on that value must be paid at some point. My question remains, how and when? My health benefit premiums are exempt from taxes (handled as pre-exclusion dollars) because that is how it worked out through my employer. If the OP is correct, and this is tax-deferred (not excluded) income, then the taxes must be paid at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. My suggestion to you would be to e-mail the author for an expert opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep, that sounds like a good idea (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. In Virginia, we do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. When? Every year?, when used?, at retirement? I'm curious. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC