Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murdoch-owned Boston Herald: Let Net Neutrality Die

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-11 02:24 PM
Original message
Murdoch-owned Boston Herald: Let Net Neutrality Die
Edited on Sun Feb-27-11 03:05 PM by blm
Serious issue under the radar. The fascists are bombing us on every issue knowing one or more of those bombs will hit the target.


http://bostonherald.com/news/opinion/editorials/view.bg?articleid=1319662

>>>>
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry is mounting a last-ditch fight to let the Federal Communications Commission impose “Net neutrality” rules on the Internet. It’s time to throw in the towel, senator.

Kerry, who is chairman of the communications subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee, wrote to the majority leader, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), and to the minority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), asking them to block a House-passed provision in the stopgap spending measure moving through Congress that would forbid the spending of money on the FCC’s December rule.

The rule ostensibly forbids service providers from interfering with transmissions on their networks.

Democratic Sens. Maria Cantwell of Washington, Al Franken of Minnesota and Ron Wyden of Oregon also signed the letter. Only Cantwell is a member of the subcommittee; neither of the other signers is on the subcommittee or the parent committee.
>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Repiggies Want to Rule the Net The Way they Rule the Airwaves
They would decide what sites we can see, just like they do on cable TV.

No more Democratic Underground, No more Al Jazeera (for us anyway), you get the idea…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-11 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep....NO news outlet for the truth will ever be allowed to gain traction with fascists in control
of the internet as well as broadcast media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That could be a good thing. Nothing to get people off their butts like shutting the net off.
Look what happened in Egypt when they shut the internet down. They rose up and started to actually DO something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. They Wouldn't Shut it Down
but they can slow it down enough so that video becomes unwatchable,
unless it comes from one of your cable company's "marketing partners".

Comcast didn't buy NBC to watch it continue to hemorrhage viewers.
They must have a plan.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. very scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not terribly. 'Control' is the illusion.
They will have a far more difficult time making such a thing real than they think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. There is a market out there for good progressive news. Right now the internet is fullfilling that
need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melman Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Murdoch doesn't own The Herald
Hasn't since '94. It is still one of the worst right-wing rags in the country, but not owned by Murdoch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Has the Boston Herald ever heard of Anonymous?
This could get interesting. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC