Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Julian Assange: 'I feel at peace'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:53 AM
Original message
Julian Assange: 'I feel at peace'
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 04:08 AM by Turborama
Source: BBC

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, in his first face-to-face broadcast interview since his release from prison on bail, has defended his organisation and explained why he is fighting extradition to Sweden over sexual assault allegations.

Speaking to Today presenter John Humphrys at the mansion in East Anglia where he is staying under strict bail conditions, he said he is fighting extradition because he believes "no natural justice" would occur in the country.

=snip=

Asked about his own personality, Mr Assange said he had time in solitary confinement to consider his life and was "perfectly happy with myself".

"Capable generous men don't create victims, they try and save people from becoming victims."

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9308000/9308216.stm



Full 25 minute audio and link to the transcript of the interview at the main article.

Longer quote in context...

"The world has a lot of problems and they need to be reformed. And we only live once. Every person who has some ability to do something about it, if they are a person of good character, has the duty to try and fix the problems in the environment which they're in.

That is a value, that, yes, comes partly from my temperament. There is also a value that comes from my father, which is that capable, generous men don't create victims, they try and save people from becoming victims. That is what they are tasked to do. If they do not do that they are not worthy of respect or they are not capable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hope he will be miraculously safe from what some real "human rights abusers"
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 04:00 AM by Judi Lynn
(the greatest understatement possible) have in mind for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Assange is a fake
and Wikileaks is a CIA front.

don't fall for the BS

he gets mainstream coverage whenever he wants

nothing substantial has been "leaked"

he would be in Gitmo if he was real, people have been disappeared for much less.

everything that's been leaked so far supports the US foreign policy agenda except for minor "limited hang out" items like the Apaches killing the journos

Assange supports the 911 OTC and says the Bilderbergs are "normal people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is great! Many of the talking points in one fell swoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Wow. It's crazy how you know this secret that no one else knows and then you just post it to a
public forum.

According to your logic you'll be in Gitmo soon. Since you know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
56. Anything is possible..
... but I've read this story now in several venues and I'm not convinced.

The jury is out but one thing is for sure, if he actually releases the stuff he says he has then he is no front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. "...comes partly from my temperament." Yeah Julian, we're lucky to have ya.
"I'm busy, I have two wars to end"

When will you end them, Julian, and HOW? Your Julianots don't seem to be curious about when, but the rest of us are.

If Julian has the power to stop the wars, those who die between now and then should find their blood on your hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Did you just fabricate that quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Just took it out of context
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 04:46 AM by Tunkamerica
Q: You want to change the world?

JA: Absolutely. The world has a lot of problems and they need to be reformed. And we only live once. Every person who has some ability to do something about it, if they are a person of good character, has the duty to try and fix the problems in the environment which they're in.

That is a value, that, yes, comes partly from my temperament. There is also a value that comes from my father, which is that capable, generous men don't create victims, they try and save people from becoming victims. That is what they are tasked to do. If they do not do that they are not worthy of respect or they are not capable.


and the "two wars to end".... not from this interview and no link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. cherokeeprogressive posted this... ""I'm busy, I have two wars to end"
In quotes. Cherokeeprogressive didn't take it out of context because Assange said no such thing.

I'm flabbergasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The quote came from something one of his former partners said. I'll find the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Good luck. The closest you will find is that Assange want two wars to end. And so do I.
And so does nearly every person that I know. And so does the majority of U.S., Iraq, and Afghan citizens. But none of us would think that we can do it on our own. Thus, Wikileaks (an organization) and anti-war activists (closely and loosely affiliated with organizations).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Here you go
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 05:03 AM by cherokeeprogressive
Daniel Domscheit-Berg:

"Mr Assange has been accused of dishonesty by key colleagues, including Daniel Domscheit-Berg, a German computer specialist who was his closest collaborator for three years until he left WikiLeaks in September.

Mr Domscheit-Berg plans to publish a book about WikiLeaks early next year. An advance copy of the publicity blurb states: ‘Not only he, but also other close colleagues could no longer put up with Assange’s high-handedness, dishonesty and grave mistakes, and got out.’

Quoting Mr Domscheit-Berg, it adds: ‘The fact that a project this powerful is under the sole control of someone with Julian Assange’s personality structure is a tangible danger to informants and collaborators.

‘Our trust was abused, we were threatened, misled and intentionally kept in the dark. It is not for nothing that many who have quit refer to him as a “dictator” . . .

‘Justified, even internal, criticism – whether about his relations with women or the lack of transparency in his actions – is either dismissed with the statement, “I’m busy, there are two wars I have to end” or attributed to the secret services’ smear campaigns."

What next? Domscheit-Berg is a CIA plant? Disgruntled employee? Jealous of Julian's sexual exploits?

Go flabbergast yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. That is not a direct quote but a characterization from a third party. Also, link please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes. The rightwing racist Daily Mail. I remain flabbergasted. Who are you going to source next?
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 05:18 AM by Luminous Animal
Fox News?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. "This megalomaniac sleazeball embodies the nightmares we face in the anarchic age of the internet"
Guess where that quote came from...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. the bible?
the daily mail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. Correct
You had me for a second there, though. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Now you're calling Daniel Domscheit-Berg a liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. No. I am characterising his statement, that you mis-attributed to Assange, as hearsay.
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 05:25 AM by Luminous Animal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Taking the easy way out huh? No matter, that's what most people whose hero has been discredited by
someone in the know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. As my dad advised me during the civil rights era, don't believe what you read in the papers.
There were plenty of activists being discredited by "people in the know." His advise has helped me to keep my eye on the prize and not be distracted by gossip of normal human foibles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. a Link would be customary. And that's a paraphrased 'quote' by hearsay
which I think any of us would agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Link. Now go ahead, discredit the source. I have to laugh...
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 05:18 AM by cherokeeprogressive
If a source provides information you agree with, you'll run with it. If a source posts information you disagree with, you'll do your best to discredit it even if you've used it to support your argument in the past.

This place is hilarious sometimes and that's why I continue to be a contributor. The hypocrisy of some DU'ers knows no bounds...

Assange is an egomaniac who is playing you, me, and the rest of us for all he's worth. How much money has been sent to his "defense fund"? Isn't it strange that he's got nothing at the moment to "defend" himself from? What will he do with all that money if and when it comes to pass that he doesn't need it? Refund it? Too funny.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339859/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-promiscuous-lifestyle-revealed-Jemima-Khan-look-away-now.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. When DUers can cite the racist Tory Daily Mail as a source, Fox News is not far behind.
And again, you misrepresented a quote from another as a quote directly from the source.

Now that is hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Call Daniel Domscheit-Berg a liar. Go ahead, say it. Type it. Own it.
Is he lying? Surely your next claim is that since he has a book coming out, he has ulterior motives.

Daniel Domscheit-Berg is who he is, and he said what he said.

Please go on record and call Daniel Domscheit-Berg a liar. Please do that for the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. well, you shouldn't quote Daniel Domscheit-Berg and represent it as Assange.
It's not ethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Settle down sport. I don't know Daniel Domschet-Berg from your left toe.
I do know that you falsely attributed a direct quote from Assange when, in fact, there is nothing but hearsay that he said any such thing.

But please, go on record and attest to the fact that Daniel Domscheit-Berg was telling the truth and nothing but the truth. Please do that for the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I'll go on record as stating the belief that Mr Domschet-Berg attributed a statement to Julian
which neither you nor I can confirm nor deny. I'll go further and state that I believe Mr. Domschet-Berg's statement about what Julian said.

I'll admit that I attributed the quote to Julian rather than Domschet-Berg, and for that I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. I think you just defined hearsay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Would that I could define anything at all Tunk...
We disagree. In the larger sense, in the grand scheme of things, I'll bet we agree on more than we disagree.

Assange thinks he's making the world a better place. I don't believe he is. Time will tell whether I'm right or wrong. When the time comes and I'm forced to eat crow, I'll eat it. Happily.

I won't let Julian come between what I think is right and what you think is right, as I bet we're both on the same page concerning most other things.

You'll get the first apology. Fair enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Oh yeah, maybe so. I would actually assume we're leaning toward the same outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
58. He might be a liar..
... or he might have a personality conflict that he is charactererizing as HE sees it or he might not have said those things at all.

There are many possibilities yet you are certain that you know the real one.

Good luck with that as you move through life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Me? I've never used that source to defend anything,
And I merely think you're wrong and ignoring etiquette regarding quotes. If you're going to quote: please use an actual quote, not hearsay, and provide the link. You didn't do either and your attack seems like it is centered on the personality of Assange which is irrelevant and jealousy that he might be making the change you're incapable of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Fair enough.
I'll stand by my belief that Assange is an egomaniac who finds himself in the spotlight and every day makes another outrageous claim without backing it up.

What do you think about the fact that he says his accusers are motivated by "revenge"? I'll have to go look, but if I'm not mistaken, the first claims against his accusers was that at least one of them were connected to the CIA?

I'll ask you this... IF he has, as he claims, information concerning some US bank that would cause it's senior officers to resign, would you hold it close to the vest and let said bank abuse its customers MORE than it already has, or would you release it IMMEDIATELY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Didn't it come out today that it was BOA? And didn't one of his accusers tweet a tweet of support
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 05:41 AM by Tunkamerica
last week? And one of his accusers was in an anti-Castro group that was associated with the CIA.


I'd say the bank thing was supposed to come out after all of the cables had been sifted through by journos, but that the current situation might warrant releasing something early. Are you suggesting that info be released without anyone looking over it? because, if I recall correctly, that's one of the main claims against Assange... that he released info willy-nilly and got imaginary people killed. If it were up to you, Wikileaks would immediately release everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Was there a document released today I didn't hear about that made BOA the object of what's about to
be released?

Julian is on record as saying his accusers were motivated by "revenge". Am I wrong about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. I don't know. Are you wrong? If you're not, please post a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Link.
"In his first UK newspaper interview since releasing hundreds of secret diplomatic cables last month, Mr Assange told The Times he predicts the US will face reprisals if it attempts to extradite him on conspiracy charges.

He accused his media partners at The Guardian newspaper, which worked with him to make the embarrassing leaks public, of unfairly tarnishing him by revealing damaging details of the sex assault allegations he faces in Sweden.

He insisted that the women behind the claims were motivated by revenge."


The above quote came from an Australian news organization. "The Times" attributed to the quote is http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/

Is "The Times" also a right wing mouthpiece out to discredit him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. You need to provide the direct link either to the Times article or from Aussie news org.
Your link takes me to the main Times page where I cannot find the quote anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. My mistake.
Third paragraph in the link below. I tried to find the information at "The Times", but it requires you to register and I don't want to. The link attributes the quote to "The Times".

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wikileaks-boss-julian-assange-turns-on-everyone/story-e6frg12c-1225974411433
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. Really? Perth now? You're basing this hateful image of a man on a line in Perth now?
One of the main tenets of yr argument is based of a line in Perth now... I think you've outed yourself, brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. Not only that but the line was not in quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #53
61. I'm curious
Is Perth Now like Australia's version of The Daily Mail/New York Post/Washington Times etc etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. here's boa and 2nd accuser stpping coop.:
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 06:14 AM by Tunkamerica
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. I don't understand why he would allow BoA to fraudulently abuse its customers if he has
information that could stop it.

Why wait until after the first of the year?

You see, that's what I don't understand about the man. If he has information that could protect millions of BoA customers, why not release it NOW, and protect them? Why the delay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. I mentioned this elsewhere in this thread... The banking leaks weren't supposed to come out till
after all the US cables had been released. The arrest and the apparent threat to his life (and prob. hinting that the banking sector is next) has pushed up the timetable. In any event, I'm guessing him naming first the banking industry, then BOA, along with the insurance file (that 10's of thousands downloaded) is basically to insure he stays alive for a few more months. If he's killed then everything gets released at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Wikileaks has always claimed that they verify the information that they receive is accurate.
Their VOLUNTEER researchers also organize materials in readable form. That is, Wikileaks, the news organization, does due diligence before releasing information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. I hate to gang up, but I think we answered all of his doubts. I'm sure his mind is changed!!!
Not! (Yes I'm old enough to reference Wayne's World).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. so your problem with him is overstatement of importance? Do you want to end these wars?
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 04:43 AM by Tunkamerica
Have you ever said so? I have. When are you going to end them, Cherokee, and how? His way is by getting info out. Yours is... casting aspersions against people who theoretically have the same ends as you? If it were a competition I'd say Assange is winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. I have said so. Many times. When am I going to end them? As soon as I'm elected.
When I'm elected, I'll issue an Executive Order bringing home not only the troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, but those stationed in EVERY country OUTCONUS. Then I'll issue an EO ordering the US Navy to conduct all readiness excercises within 500 miles of CONUS.

You need to elect me though, and that's going to be a hard row to hoe seeing as I'm a former adulterer, smoke weed on a regular basis, and think EVERY politician is a liar with an ego problem.

Next question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Well, I doubt it needs to be said but, the blood is on your hands until you get elected.
And if any of the faults that you listed keep you from that goal, then I guess you should have anticipated that when you committed the acts as you expect Assange to have done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
62. I'm glad he pisses you off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wish he'd stop talking and just stick to the task he assigned himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I hope he talks more. He's an intelligent thoughtful person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. I find him boring. It's all about Julian. I'm interested in the leaks
not lionizing Assange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. I read the leaks every day. I also go here:
http://wlcentral.org/
and here:
http://cablesearch.org/
and here:
http://www.elpais.com/global/
and here:
http://english.aljazeera.net/

And, as long as the U.S. empire seeks to prosecute Assange, I will also be interested in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. The BBC interviewer went on and on about the so-called "rape"
allegations. Those will be taken care of in the court. People are accused of rape more frequently than we might realize.

I would have liked to hear more about the origins of the Wikileaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. Yes, I used to really like the way John Humphrys interviewed politicians
This interview has destroyed any respect I previously had for him and I'm amazed Julian went through with his total tabloid schmuckery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
59. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC