Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Julian Assange, Feminism, and Rape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 03:47 PM
Original message
Julian Assange, Feminism, and Rape

Julian Assange, Feminism, and Rape


How the WikiLeaks founder shined the spotlight on the debate over sex, rape, and consent.

One unexpected consequence of the WikiLeaks saga has been to turn the spotlight on the debate over rape, sex, and consent. Julian Assange, journalism's misbegotten enfant terrible, has been hounded by accusations of sex crimes after he vaulted to fame by releasing leaked classified documents on the Internet. The charges were dismissed but then reinstated; Assange was arrested in London earlier this month and was released on bail last week while he fights extradition to Sweden. The nature of these charges has revived questions about where the law should draw the line between bad behavior and criminal acts, and whether the feminist rethinking of rape has made it easy for any man to be targeted.

As is widely known, Assange is accused of sexual offenses against two women: Anna Ardin, a left-wing activist who helped organize his speaking tour in Sweden last August, and photographer Sofia Wilen. The prosecution asserts both encounters started out as consensual but later turned into assaults—partly, it seems, because of Assange's failure to use a condom despite the women's wishes. The triviality of the offenses is compounded by the women's un-victim-like behavior afterward: Ardin had sex with Assange again and threw a party for him; Wilen made him breakfast. It was only when the women learned of his two-timing that they went to the police—initially intending to force him to get tested for sexually transmitted diseases.

In the United States, the sex charges have been met with near-unanimous derision across the political spectrum. Conservative media personality Glenn Beck and feminist writer/activist Naomi Wolf have both satirized the case as one in which the man acted like a jerk and the women are seeking payback for hurt feelings. This unanimity is no doubt partly due to the fact that, on the left, the instinct to back women claiming sexual abuse by men has been blunted by Assange's status as a rebel fighting the power—while on the right, scorn for feminist sexual ideology has proved stronger than distaste for Assange. Along with the Assange prosecution, Swedish sexual assault laws have also come under ridicule for defining the offense so broadly that half the male population could end up in the slammer.

Some feminists are not amused. MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann decided to suspend his Twitter account after being slammed as a "rape apologist" for tweets expressing skepticism about the charges. In The Washington Post, Jessica Valenti, a star of the feminist blogosphere, has lashed out at what she considers distorted accounts of the case while offering her own highly selective summary of the facts. Valenti thinks the real problem is "our country's overly narrow understanding of sexual assault," which falls woefully short of Sweden's far better standards.

http://reason.com/archives/2010/12/22/julian-assange-feminism-and-ra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Marking to read a little later.
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, that writer is willing to twist Swedish and all law
and the entire history of rape law to make it look like Julian did "some good."

It's up to Swedish law. Julian's fans don't get to decide Swedish law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. when rape law is used to regulate "sexual manners"
when rape law is used to regulate "sexual manners" rather than sexual violence, it has seriously strayed from its purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Swedish law may be an arbiter or power, but not of morality.
It is not up to their law to decide people's conclusions on the morality of this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. "Swedish law" threw out the charges and a political appointee re-instated them.
Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpyoldfart Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who was Raped?
Two women scorned after having consensual sex with Assange so both scream Rape but withdraw complaint because they both filed false charges in the heat of the moment. Now steps in the Politicians and Government agencies to have the Rape charges reinstalled in the hope of either blackmailing Assange to cease or to have him deported to the land of free USA. So who's getting Raped and how bent is the America Government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. As the event showed
Good point, bad place to have the point.

Naomi Klein already showed how insulting this is in the face of real crimes that go unpunished in favor of a politically based attack with sketchy evidence.

As an advocate against sexual crimes myself, I'm often awed/cynically amused that we as a society don't give a damn unless it affects us or someone we love, unless we are told we're supposed to be outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC