Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Birther faces court martial for refusing deployment orders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:28 PM
Original message
Birther faces court martial for refusing deployment orders
Pure. Insanity.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_spoint/20101214/ts_yblog_spoint/birther-faces-court-martial-for-refusing-deployment-orders

"By Jade Walker jade Walker – Tue Dec 14, 8:35 am ET

A court martial proceeding against an 18-year Army veteran who refuses to deploy to Afghanistan will begin today at Fort Meade in Maryland.

According to The Associated Press, Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin disobeyed orders to report to a Kentucky base earlier this year because he doubts whether President Barack Obama was born in the United States and questions his eligibility to be president. Click here to view the charges.

Lakin served in Afghanistan, Korea, Bosnia, Germany, Honduras and El Salvador before taking up an occupational and environmental medicine residency in Maryland. In 2009, he became the chief of primary care at the Army's DiLorenzo TRICARE Health Clinic at the Pentagon. If Lakin is found guilty, he faces a dishonorable discharge, several years in prison and a forfeiture of his pay, which totals nearly $8,000 a month, CNN reported.

FactCheck.org, a non-partisan, nonprofit consumer advocate site for voters, debunked the claims of the "birthers" back in 2008, and even posted a copy of Obama's birth certificate online. State officials in Hawaii have repeatedly checked the files and confirmed that Obama was born in Honolulu."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Throw the book at the idiot. Anyone that dumb would be a danger to other troops in the field anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This kind of stupid shouldn't be allowed to hold a gun.
PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. 18 years in--he'd better not be allowed to retire at 20 and collect a pension, that asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Didn't you read?
"If Lakin is found guilty, he faces a dishonorable discharge, several years in prison and a forfeiture of his pay, which totals nearly $8,000 a month, CNN reported."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. dumbass
If I was his wife, I'd kick his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have little doubt he will be convicted - in military courts, the motive does not matter,
and there is NO QUESTION he DELIBERATELY missed a troop movement to a war zone, and DELIBERATELY and REPEATEDLY refused valid orders...
In times past, he might have been shot for all that.
He won't get much chance to review his "beliefs" that Obama is not a valid CIC, and he WILL get several years in Leavenworth Military Disciplinary Barracks, which, while not the hell hole it once was, is no day at the beach, either.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bush* was not convicted and he refused a Direct Order to take a flight physical
All they did to him was ground him......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is a completely different situation - the officer in question is a career
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 06:21 PM by old mark
Lt. Col. who REFUSED to go with his unit to a war zone. There are few worse things he could have done in the Army's eyes...


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC