Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dichotomous thinking. All or nothing. Good or bad. Wonderful or evil.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 09:51 PM
Original message
Dichotomous thinking. All or nothing. Good or bad. Wonderful or evil.
"You're either with us or against us."--George W. Bush

http://bpd.about.com/od/glossary/g/dichot.htm
Definition:
Dichotomous thinking is also sometimes called “black or white thinking.” This is when someone is only able to see the extremes of a situation, and is unable to see the “gray areas” or complexities of the situation. For example, a student who engages in dichotomous thinking may believe that if they don't get an "A" in class then they have failed.

Dichotomous thinking is a very common problem in people with borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this disorder, people tend to see themselves, others, and the world as either “all good” or “all bad.” Dichotomous thinking in BPD is linked to splitting behavior.

Also Known As: black or white thinking


http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_7398/is_6_37/ai_n35695950/
Dichotomous thinking relates to the propensity to think of things in terms of binary opposition: "black or white", "good or bad", or "all or nothing". This thinking style is useful for quick comprehension and decision making. Moreover, dichotomous outcomes are commonly used in everyday society. In the political realm, the vote is either for or against proposed bills. In the criminal court system, defendants are either guilty or not guilty. Such clear outcomes bring immediate closure to debates or problems and expedite arriving at conclusions. However, this black-and-white thinking style can potentially lead to a gross misunderstanding between people who have incompatible opinions. While it may have advantages for quick decision making, dichotomous thinking has also been related to negative psychological outcomes. For example, dichotomous thinking has been related to some cluster B and C personality disorders (Beck, Freeman, & Davis, 1990). In their model of clinical perfectionism, Shafran, Cooper, and Fairburn (2002) linked dichotomous thinking and perfectionism, indicating that dichotomous thinking is a central factor that maintains perfectionism.

(clip)

Splitting is one of the defense mechanisms from psychoanalytic theory and this is also closely related to dichotomous thinking style. Splitting leads to value judgments of everything being either "good" or "bad" while dichotomous thinking affects a wider range of judgment than does splitting. While splitting is generally regarded as an unconscious defense that plays a necessary role in psychic development, it is also an identified symptom of both Borderline and Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Jacobson, 1954; Volkan, 1988). In recent advances in cognitive therapy, some researchers proposed another meaning of splitting as relating to the cognitive domain. The central schema of splitting is to see oneself and others as "all good" or "all bad". According to Benjamin and Friedrich (1991) and Horowitz (1977), any one component of a schema can activate the entire schema, evoking its power to influence current events. Because the dominant schema determines what is noticed, how it is processed, the meaning that is assigned, and the emotions that are evoked, schemas that are anchored in "all good" or "all bad" spheres perpetuate the abrupt oscillations (Siegel, 2006). In this way, splitting relates not only to cognitive processes but also to processing of emotions and memory.

(clip)

Overall, the DTI was found to have acceptable levels of reliability and validity for measuring individuals' dichotomous thinking. This inventory may be applicable not only to personality disorders and depression but also to wider psychological symptoms. For example, uncertainty avoidance and intolerance of ambiguity are related to ideological orientation. In particular, in some studies it has been found that intolerance of ambiguity has a positive relationship with conservative political attitude (e.g., Jost, 2006), and results in the present study showed a positive relationship between high scores gained on the DTI and intolerance of ambiguity. So, it is possible that dichotomous thinking is related to certain political attitudes such as conservatism. In addition, a positive relationship was found between high scores gained on the DTI and tendency to undervalue others. Undervaluing of others is positively related to anger (Hayamizu, Kino, & Takagi, 2005) and hostility (Kodaira, Oshio, & Hayamizu, 2007), and dichotomous thinking is also related to entity versus incremental theory in perception of others (Levy, Stroessner, & Dweck, 1998). It would be worthwhile to explore the relationships between dichotomous thinking, interpersonal theory, and interpersonal decision making. However, the data gathered to validate the DTI in this study are not sufficiently comprehensive, hence further studies are required to carry out further validation tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remember how we mocked "You're either with us or against us"?
Now it's the linchpin of much of DU's thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I see it on both sides. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I see it on both sides and it is too bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, it is.
I thought maybe that's what you were getting at, in that thread that got locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I don't see that as the majority view here, luckily
But there is a very vocal minority that is trumpeting that point of view. I see it as a pretty hypocritical stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. And the greatest Bushian dichotomy of all:
How could anyone (let alone millions) see that smarmy, arrogant fucktard as a good and caring man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because you love nobody more than a person who shares
all of your secret hates. They saw a kindred spirit with all the same barely-suppressed prejudices and nastiness that they had built their own lives around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks! I feel much better now! Uh-oh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Some years ago that phrase was shorthand for Bush style authoritarian thinking.
More recently I've seen it used here with complete sincerity.

WTF. I guess some people just lack an irony gene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC