Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: TSA gropings and pat downs - Am I the only one noticing that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 04:32 AM
Original message
Re: TSA gropings and pat downs - Am I the only one noticing that
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 04:33 AM by truedelphi
After hundreds of thousands of man hours of pat downs, TSA has yet to announce that they have foiled even a single terrorist!

Meanwhile, people have been arrested for small amounts of weed. Recently, there was a woman in Austin TX who was arrested and DRAGGED away for not wanting to be humiliated and inappropriately groped. Another unfortunate soul had his body respond inappropriately to the pat downs, and after his orgasm, he too was arrested.

And now these masters of terrorist detection and their scanning machinery will be set up at hotels and shopping malls all across this land of freedom!


But you have to admit the people running the company holding the patent on the scanning machinery are probably socking away a small fortune.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. What?
"And now these masters of terrorist detection and their scanning machinery will be set up at hotels and shopping malls all across this land of freedom!"

What did I miss? When is this happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was discussed just a lil while ago here on DU and
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 05:20 AM by truedelphi
Here is the link:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4673768

And a link for how efficiently the Scanners can detect even small amounts of weed in plastic baggies, another DU link:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4673768

And I feel badly for the guy who was overly excited by the TSA gropings, and then arrested for that "perversion." With today's spophisticated anti-depression drugs, some people are inadvertently over stimulated sexually. Zoloft can have that effect on some people.

So it may be the fault of the guy's prescription meds, and not his "impure thoughts" or poor self control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Neither of those links says that.
I'll panic about scanners at hotels and shopping malls when they might actually put them there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. then go ahead and start worrying...
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 07:33 AM by ixion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4673768

By Agence France-Presse
Sunday, December 26th, 2010 -- 6:40 pm
WASHINGTON – The United States is stepping up security at "soft targets" like hotels and shopping malls, as well as trains and ports, as it counters the evolving Al-Qaeda threat, a top official said Sunday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
47. Why?
That is the same link that says nothing about scanners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. If the scanners are the only thing that bothers you about the TSA
then there's no sense in discussing this further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. Since the TSA was not the discussion, that may be for the best
I was talking about the made up non-sense that homeland security was going to install body scanners in hotels and malls. I have no idea why you are bringing the TSA into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. ...which will be FAR too late for anything to be done about them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
48. Perhaps but....
I don't buy for a second they are going to be putting body scanners in hotels or malls. I also think trying to make this into something where they are is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Wasn't that one about the orgasm satire?
Do you have a link to that story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. That's what I thought, too.
But it could happen, couldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. The orgasm story was a joke.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 02:15 PM by LisaL
But the woman who got arrested for refusing a pat down (she asked TSA to not pat down of her breasts) is real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. I was at a hotel in New York about 3 months ago and was shocked by a sign
stating that suitcases and baggage might be subjected to Xray screening or inspection blah,blah,blah. It really creeped me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. They did catch a small baggie of pot
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. My sister, who only flies 1st class, says she has never been groped or X-rayed.
She travels everywhere and often. But she has never been scanned by the nude x-ray machines nor has she been groped. Is this an anomaly? Have other 1st class passengers been subjected to this crap?

I suspect the rich don't have to endure this humiliation. Probably because we all know rich people aren't terrorists and terrorists can't buy 1st class tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. just been lucky so far the new procedures went in place dec 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I've flown coach twice since the "new rules" and it's not happened to me...at least yet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Your sister may be mistaken.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 10:03 AM by leveymg
She may not have noticed any difference going through the scanners from the old metal detectors. I know I didn't in November when I traveled on business, except TSA asked me to raise my hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Well the 911 hijackers had first or business class seats
So there is no excuse for the TSA not checking them out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. TSA is far too busy scrutinizing people with medical issues and devices
so busy that they can't scan much more than a fraction of everybody else.

if you think that's effective...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. Depends on the airports and the terminals she has visited
Some airports do not yet have the strip search machines, and depending on the layout of the airport, you may only be subjected to the machines at certain terminals. (Fly Delta, get strip searched; fly Continental and blow right through-- makes a lot of sense, yes?) Plus, after the outrage last month it seems the TSA has silently backed down a bit on using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. it's only certain airports
i flew from sacramento to orange county during thanksgiving. no patdowns, no xray machines in either of those airports (yet). however...if i had taken san francisco to LA or san diego (where the machines are in use), it would have been a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yesterday I heard a report that they spotted something on a little old lady
and singled her out for a search, but somehow she slipped away from them. A little old lady! It delayed all kinds of flights, too. Grandma probably had a hidden cache of Pepto Bismal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. They saw "something suspicious" on a body scanner.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 11:35 AM by LisaL
But elderly lady got away despite the "manhunt" through the entire airport. It would have been funny if it wasn't so sad.
"TSA described the slip-up as a minor error, although it sparked a manhunt throughout the entire airport. Security agents mobilized the command post. Officers searched terminals for the women, whose photos were given to gate agents."
http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=13741290
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nope, you're not alone.
You'd think TSA would be crowing about all the terrorist attacks they've thwarted by confiscating shampoo and inappropriate touching. This is all about enriching the already rich and keeping the sheep tranquilized by repeating the "we're making you safer" meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. Now careful here -- remember that dissatisfaction with the TSA is playing into the RW's hands.

Or so I've been told...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. And showing you have something to hide!
If you're not bending over you're OBVIOUSLY working for Al Qaeda.

NOW SPREAD EM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. And trashing the president for just giving his opinion!!
Who says it has to be a valid opinion??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're not there to catch terrorists.
They're there to instill fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mercuryblues Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. satire


http://www.snopes.com/politics/satire/patdown.asp


http://www.deadseriousnews.com/?page_id=2

Percy Cummings, who was arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting a TSA agent during a pat-down last month, was Twitter’s top Tweet for 2010, according to a company spokesperson.
<snip>
Cummings and his partner, Sergio Armani, have been in seclusion since his release from Federal custody. Calls and emails to their residence have not been returned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. The scanning machinery - bingo. It is always about the profit with capitalism, no matter what the
topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. They plan to have 500 machines in place by the end of the year
and to have 1000 machines by the end of 2011
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. appx $150,000 per machine
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 10:18 AM by DemReadingDU
Somebody definitely is getting rich


edit to add link

The machines cost about $150,000 each.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/27/business/27road.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Follow the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
39. Michael Chertoff.. Set the whole thing up while he was
in Homeland Security, and just happens to own part of the company supplying the machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. The reasons for TSA's is to discourage airline travel. Period.
Part of the re-arranging of America plan is to get people to stop with this idea that they can freely travel around. We know now Agenda 21 exists, we know we are 're-wilding' America, and part of that plan is getting population centers more concentrated in certain areas and cleaning the humans out of other areas. Then it will simply be more difficult to travel because of the layout of the highways, checkpoints, cost of gas, and huge boundaries on areas that they dont' want people to go.

We are already in the position of being told no, we can't fly, and we don't have to be told why we can't fly. They got away with that, they get away with X-Raying us at airports, sticking their hands down our pants, getting arrested for just trying to back out of getting on a plane to avoid the gropings.

Are we still in America, people? Anybody out there still think so?

They are having their way with us. Jobs being exported out, food being genetically manipulated into something that even hungry animals refuse to eat, cameras and face scanners 'everywhere' (getting there), putting health food stores and farmers markets out of business, taking over the educational system so all our kids think the way they want us to think. Most of us are already the product of that system.

We see discussed here alot of Americans getting a one way ticket out of here. Those of us left behind will be nothing but serfs who will do whatever is in front of us to get a meal in our gut and a roof over our head. They don't 'need' us and the de-population plan applies to our country as well, we are 90% down the road of where they are taking us already.

I started hearing about this stuff long before I ever had a computer, or even believed I would ever want one. This is the sad part, I can not look around me and not believe what I see even if I wished I could.

"We'll show them! We'll just refuse to fly!"

Yep. We'll show them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Count us among those leaving.
My wife and I are starting the paperwork to leave and emigrate to canada . We are also looking at south Africa.

The reasons are purely financial. Overall lower tax/fees and cost of living, better and more affordable education, and a much higher quality of life. Plus neither country is spending itself into the ground on military and corporate welfare.

The USA is done. The only questions are only how many will die while it flushes down the crapper and what will be left, if anything, in the aftermath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. So long.
Better try for SA, for if the U.S. fails, so will Canada.

This country is Canada's largest trading partner, we stop buying, Canada fails.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Canada is the usa's biggest trading partner.
Most canadiens realize the problems with being tied too closely to the USA and it is country that is relatively debt free and swiftly changing its trading habits and diversifying at a stunning rate.

If the USA falls Canada will suffer bit not asuch as you would think. Given that their exports are highly desirable they will not lack in customers. Compared to that what has the USA to offer?

Don't get memwrong I love the USA and I love Americans but we are on a one way trip down. For myself and my families future we have decided to invest in our future in a country that is still investing in it's own future. Investing in it's future is something the USA stopped doing over 30 years ago. How much longer can we coast on past investment?

I hope I'm wrong. But I'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Pretty hard to deny the evidence right in front of you (us)...
isn't it??

Once your eyes are opened, you wonder why everyone else can't see it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. This is not a fun country anymore.
What ever happened to "Nothing to fear but fear itself?" and 'Party on!?"

There's too much money in the insecurity business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Give me liberty or give me death.
What should the slogan be now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Bend over and cough? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. Anything from George Orwell would suffice
Homeland Security should just go ahead and carve him on Mt. Rushmore and get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Give us the security of a living death. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
36. I went through two airports on my way to Amsterdam...
no one touched me or my partner, it was quick and easy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Yep. And chances are, had there been a terrorist in your midst,
The Security Personnel would have been detecting the small but perhaps perceptible tell tale signs regarding that passenger, rather than focusing most of their attention on some poor woman with her post-rape trauma issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. orgasm???
wtf? :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hotels? Are you sure about that?
The idea of having hotel staff viewing you naked in order to stay there seems far fetched, but hell, the way things are going these days little can surprise me.

Do you have any links for the 'hotels and shopping malls' thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Not gonna happen
The places that can afford the equipment are not going to offend their clientele in the first place.
The places that can't afford the equipment are not going to drive away their customers by treating them as common criminals by groping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Saw TSA at 30th St Station in Philly recently
Being their ever so officious selves.

The "abundance of caution" meme is starting to catch on, and shopping malls and such just love to control the people who come in.

It will come unless we make noise and object now.

And the airlines appear to be bowing to the "security consultants" and driving away customers by allowing the TSA to treat all travelers like common criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
45. hard to take an OP seriously when it can't distinguish satire from fact
sorry, anyone who falls for the orgasm story deserves an award for gullibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL. I received at least four emails from folks about the orgasm story -
And I confess to laughing so hard at the end of this part of the tale of one of the emails:

In Cummings’ defense, there are signs all over the airport that say you’re not allowed to bring liquids past the checkpoint. The TSA screener, who now goes by the nickname, "Squirt," could not by reached for comment. I assume he was too busy having a brand new mother arrested for spilling milk on him.


That I failed to research more thoroughly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
51. Oh, and look at how accountable TSA has been -
They spent some thirty million bucks on "puffers" that would shoot blasts of air on you, and somehow this woud help them determine if you recently had been assembling explosives.

Except it didn't end up working that well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/20/AR2010122005599.html

From the article:
The Transportation Security Administration spent about $30 million on devices that puffed air on travelers to "sniff" them out for explosives residue. Those machines ended up in warehouses, removed from airports, abandoned as impractical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. The concept of accountability is a foreign one to TSA. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC