Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reader's Digest's golden era recalled as last workers leave

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:38 AM
Original message
Reader's Digest's golden era recalled as last workers leave

CHAPPAQUA — The immense winged Pegasus statues will stay — but only because the symbols of Reader's Digest are too heavy to be moved from atop the Georgian cupola. The stretch of blacktop off the Saw Mill River Parkway is still called Reader's Digest Road. But the company that gave these things to Chappaqua is gone. Some might say Reader's Digest as they knew it has been gone for a while. But this month the Digest officially moved its last workers out of the building in Chappaqua where it put out the world's largest-circulation magazine since 1939. The Digest's new headquarters are in Manhattan and a few departments work out of White Plains. The Chappaqua headquarters building that was for decades filled with thousands of employees will be leased to other companies by its new owners. But the memories of the Digest's days in Chappaqua will linger.<[br />In its heyday during the lifetime of its founders, DeWitt and Lila Wallace, the company took its place as the premier corporate citizen of Chappaqua, a place where locals could go down and get a job and employees were treated to legendary perks. But after its founders died and the company went public in 1990, the things that made both the magazine and the business distinctive began to change as it tried to remake itself to fit a new media landscape.

For decades, though, the Digest was different.

"It was a very great place to work," said Ed Thompson, a former editor-in-chief for The Reader's Digest Association. "I can't imagine a company being better."

For DeWitt Wallace, the most important thing was his employees, not the readers, said Thompson, who joined the company in 1960 and lives in North Salem.

"He wanted them to be as happy as can be and paid well," he said.


http://www.lohud.com/article/201012260343

Key sentence from the above:

"But after its founders died and the company went public in 1990"

Invenstors, I am guessing, did not care so much about the product as they did about squuezing every cent out of it they could get. Private companies want to make money too, but see the long haul and care more about the actual product, it's customers, and employees - investors in this day and age want a quick, short term profit, and will chop away all they can for a number.

Sure, some will say 'so, it was a RW mag, etc and so on' still does not matter.

From later in the article:

As the 1990s wore on, the way the Wallaces did business began to be seen as quaint and old-fashioned. Where DeWitt Wallace would subsidize foreign editions that were losing money instead of closing them, the new leadership began launching reorganizations and cutting staff in waves of layoffs.

They also started changing the magazine, doing away with the condensed articles and adding features about celebrities.

"There's 100 magazines that do that better than the Digest," Thompson said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Going public has destroyed a lot of companies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Humor in Cuneiform
Ok, that pun was somebody's ID on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I thought they were a CIA propaganda rag...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. I had the guilty pleasure of reading their Vietnam-war era editions. Oh yes they were. -nt
One article had the title, "In Vietnam, the Enemy is Defeated." :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. I only remember two articles from '60s era Reader's Digest
"I don't believe in ghosts but... There's something strange going on at the George and Dragon Inn" July 1967
"The ghost in Elke Sommer's house" (Not sure if that is the actual title) November 1966
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Long post, I'll wait for the summary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Westchester, NY factory that turned out pre-digested rightwing journalism closes. Spawned tabloids.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 08:24 AM by leveymg
Former managers and executives remember elaborate perks with fondness.

Spawned supermarket tabloids, and ultimately could not compete with them.

A real loss to western civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Thanks
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 10:00 AM by jberryhill

You should start "condensed DU".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That would have been inaccurate.
I know you don't think much of some DUers, and have expressed that repeatedly.

With all due respect, why do you stick around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Because sometimes I disagree with some people?

I've been a registered Democrat my entire adult life, and I believe this forum is for Democrats.

BERRYHILL, JOHN
SELF EMPLOYED/ATTORNEY 9/9/08 $1,000 Obama, Barack (D)
BERRYHILL, JOHN
SELF EMPLOYED/ATTORNEY 1/4/08 $500 Obama, Barack (D)
BERRYHILL, JOHN
SELF/ATTORNEY 10/12/08 $250 Tinklenberg, Elwyn (D)

I'm sorry you believe that disagreement on one thing or another amounts to you thinking I "don't think much of some DUers", but I decline your invitation to leave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Being disagreeable can be an art form. H.L Mencken was an old cur
and held some very un-P.C. views, including his opposition to FDR, much of the New Deal, and U.S. entry into WWII.

But, he was a whit with a sharp pen that usually drew more laughter than blood.

Democratic credentials actually count less in my book than an original point of view with something to say. So, I guess you're also invited to stay. Take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Schizophrenics have an original viewpoint and something to say
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 03:52 PM by jberryhill
....but I'll call out crazy when IMHO I see it.

You'll find the ignore button to the right of my name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Perfect!
They do make perfect bathroom material though.
Each article just long enough to keep the attention of the average 'merican which is coincidentally the same amount of time as the average bowel movement.
By the time it gets nasty and tattered, you've read all the jokes.. a brand new one shows up at the door.

perfectly American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. It pays to increase your word power..
I grew up being challenged on that by my father, by the time I was ten it was fairly rare for me to miss a word on that monthly feature.

But I came to the conclusion that was just another Digest lie, I never made so much as an extra nickel for being well read and articulate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. For a very long time, there were RDs in doctors' office waiting rooms
and dentists' offices.. I think we still have some of them from the 70's..(we subscribed when a neighbor's child wore us down)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. If Reagan Was Alive He Would Have Nothing To Read....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:58 AM
Original message
I am Joe's Enraged, Inflamed Sense of Rejection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. LOL! Any mention of RD reminds me of those "I am Joe's..." articles
I loved to read those as a kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Investment Class has ruined the world, literally. They produce nothing. They force companies
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 07:59 AM by WinkyDink
and franchises into endless expansion, no matter their ultimate demise by diminishing returns.
They demand "cost-efficiency" for profits, no matter the cost in numbers of employees and their wages/benefits, in environmental health and safety, even in product quality.
The lowest-denominator is their Holy Grail.

They are the Lords of Capitalism, to whom the Corporate Dukes and Political Earls pledge fealty, while suffering the Working Serfs and the Peasants not well, and hiring Knights to risk life and limb protecting their wealth near and far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. The "Investment Class" is a domination machine, hopelessly
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 12:50 PM by ladjf
addicted to hoarding wealth and power for reasons that they themselves don't even understand. And their neurosis is seriously, if not fatally, damaging life on Earth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's not going public that killed RD, it's the Internet.
Same as Newsweek or any of the papers. My hometown only has one paper now, where we had two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shirlden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Not really
the internet. I quit reading RD before Al birthed the internet because it turned into a preachy right wing rag. I would have to guess that the kind of people who read RD were not the ones on the internet. And, as for Newsweek, I had a subscription since the 1950's and dropped it when it too turned into a right wing rag. My city has had only one newspaper for a good many years and it too is a right wing rag which I do not read.......... Notice a pattern here?? Thanks to the Goddess we do have an internet. I can get honest news from all over the world without having it filtered through a (yeh, you guessed it) a "right wing rag".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. I quit reading Car & Driver and Mechanix Illustrated for the same reason.
All the regular news mags went right. I'm pretty much stuck with Hustler and Consumer Reports and I'm having doubts about Consumer Reports...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Wasn't it always a right wing rag?
From Wikipedia: From its inception, RD has maintained a conservative and anti-communist perspective on political and social issues.

OTOH, it was the first magazine to publicize the link between cigarette smoking and cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I quit Newsweek, too
several years ago. Discontinued our local newspaper this year as it has turned into a shill for corporations. Made me sad as I had subscribed for many years. It used to be a decent paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I only subscribe to the hometown paper and The Economist.
The paper gives me news I can get nowhere else.

The Economist is the only magazine I cannot finish in under 15 minutes. Get by the slant to the writing (which though center-Right in Britain is a bit left of the DLC) and it has a wealth of stories about the world that you just don't get in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. I stopped subscribing with the "That's Outrageous" column.

They picked a demographic (RW'ers) that no longer reads. Poor choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. "They picked a demographic (RW'ers) that no longer reads."
That nails it - a recipe for failure. RW'ers want only to have their fear & anger stoked and reinforced -- and RD was not sufficiently bilious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. An interesting mag when I was a child...
but then, I grew up and the mag did not. A fundie mag for the past 30/40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. What really killed it was stopping the contest
The thing that really sold a lot of Reader's Digests was the contest. There was this big thing that kinda tied entering the sweepstakes to getting a subscription. Then they signed a consent decree with the FTC (I think) and some stae's attorney generals that it was unfair to have the sweepstakes tied so closely to a subscription drive, subscriptions plunged (and a lot of subscribers died) and here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. Last year
Was the last of my subscriptions. It was a yearly thing, my daughter would get it for Christmas
every year for me, I told her to stop wasting the money on it as it was not worth reading anymore.

Used to be worth it but now by the time you tore out all the cardboard ad pages there was little left and what was left was not worth it, even the jokes were mostly old or not funny and not many of the at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think they lost future generations with their pro-Viet Nam & Raygun articles
I read it as a child but after all that rah rah stuff I gave up on it. It's kind of sad that it never really progressed into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC