Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Important message from Senator Bernie Sanders...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:22 PM
Original message
Important message from Senator Bernie Sanders...
From Senator Bernie Sanders

Thank you for your progressive political activism and your strong efforts on behalf of grassroots democracy and the survival of the American middle-class. As Vermont’s senator and perhaps the most progressive member of the U.S. Senate I look forward to working together with you in the up-and-coming struggles that our country faces.

The very simple and truthful political reality is that those of us in Congress who are prepared to stand up to right-wing extremism will not be successful without the strong support of millions of Americans at the grassroots level. Equally true is the reality that the average American citizen - disgusted with tax breaks for billionaires, Wall Street greed, a never-ending recession, attacks on Social Security, two wars and minimal efforts against global warming - will not see their views translated into legislation without the support of progressive members of Congress. We have got to work together. Let’s do it!

I should also mention that as Vermont’s senator I will be up for re-election in 2012. As the longest serving Independent in congressional history (16 years in the House and 4 in the Senate) there is no question in my mind that the Republicans, Karl Rove and the big-money interests behind them will do everything they can to defeat me. If you would like to help out in my campaign, please visit my website and consider making a contribution.

With a right-wing Republican Party taking control of the House of Representatives on January 5th, and with the Republicans gaining 6 seats in the Senate, let me briefly outline to you some of the immediate political struggles that I see occurring:

THE ECONOMY: In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s, the middle class is collapsing and poverty is increasing. Meanwhile, the people at the top are doing phenomenally well. The crooks on Wall Street whose greed precipitated this recession are now earning more money than before the American people bailed them out. The top one percent in our country now earn over 23 percent of all income, more than the bottom 50 percent. The U.S. today has by far the most unequal distribution of income and wealth of any major country on earth and the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing wider. While “official” unemployment is at 9.8 percent, real unemployment is over 16 percent – being especially high for blue collar workers, the young and people of color. Despite all of this the Republicans, whose campaigns are funded by some of the richest people and largest corporations in the country, want more tax breaks for the wealthy, more government deregulation, more unfettered free trade, more anti-union legislation and no more funding for unemployment benefits.

DEFICIT REDUCTION: President Bush converted the large budget surplus which President Clinton bequeathed to him into record-breaking deficits because of Bush’s huge tax breaks for the rich, two wars, the Medicare Part D prescription drug program and the Wall Street bailout – all unpaid for. Now, with the Republicans having successfully won more tax breaks for the rich under President Obama and thus massively driving up the national debt, those same Republicans are hell-bent on moving toward "deficit reduction" by slashing many programs desperately needed by working Americans. They will go after Medicare, Medicaid, affordable housing, education and childcare, veterans’ needs, infrastructure and environmental protection – among many other areas. In their eyes, tax breaks for billionaires are good. Affordable housing and educational opportunities for working families are bad.

SOCIAL SECURITY: Under the guise of fighting for deficit reduction, the Republicans will unleash an unprecedented attack against Social Security. They will attempt to slash benefits, raise the retirement age and move toward the eventual privatization of a program which has, for 75 years, successfully lifted many tens of millions of elderly Americans, people with disabilities and widows and orphans out of poverty. Make no mistake about it: the attempt to destroy Social Security has nothing to do with deficit reduction. Social Security today has a $2.6 trillion dollar surplus, can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible American for the next 27 years and has not contributed one nickel to the deficit. This is an ideological struggle on the part of Republicans in Congress and their billionaire backers to undo the most significant government social program in the history of the United States. They want Wall Street to provide retirement benefits, not Social Security – not because this is a better plan for seniors, but because it ensures massive profits for Wall Street.

ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY: Most of us share the view of the vast majority of scientists who, having examined all existing evidence, have concluded that global warming is real and is almost certainly caused by man-made activities. Our goal must be to cut greenhouse gas emissions and transform our energy system away from fossil fuels and into energy efficiency and sustainable energy. In the process of moving our country to energy independence we can, over a period of years, create millions of good paying jobs. Almost all Republicans in Congress disagree. Supported by the coal and oil companies, Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh, they believe that global warming is a “hoax,” and that our energy system should continue to be largely reliant on fossil fuels. The newly empowered Republicans in Congress will do everything they can to weaken the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and, in a variety of ways, give support to the oil and coal companies. This is no small issue. The future of the planet, in terms of extreme weather disturbances, flooding, drought, disease and large-scale human migration, may be at stake. We must vigorously fight for environmental sanity and for energy policies that move us away from fossil fuels.

As Vermont’s Senator I look forward to working with you on the issues that I’ve discussed as well as many that I haven’t had time to get into in this letter.

I would also appreciate your political and financial support for my 2012 reelection campaign. There is no doubt that I will be opposed by every big-money interest in the country: Wall Street and the credit card companies, the insurance and drug corporations, the big banks, the military-industrial complex, the oil and coal companies and every other special interest that I’ve taken on over the past twenty years. The issue of securing enough money to run a strong campaign becomes especially relevant in light of the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision which allows corporations and billionaires to invest as much money as they want into campaigns in total secrecy. Please support my campaign by donating today.

Let me conclude by thanking you once again for your activism and by wishing you and your family a healthy, happy and peaceful new year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. This good senator will most definitely be on my list to send money to.
He is a star dem as far as I'm concerned and I hope he is in the senate for ages to come. Thank you Senator Sanders, job well done and more to come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. big k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I nearly ran him down on the street a few months ago, trying to get to him to
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 02:31 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
tell him how much of a hero I think he is for the American people.

But here's my question with regard to social security. Bernie writes:

SOCIAL SECURITY: Under the guise of fighting for deficit reduction, the Republicans will unleash an unprecedented attack against Social Security. They will attempt to slash benefits, raise the retirement age and move toward the eventual privatization of a program which has, for 75 years, successfully lifted many tens of millions of elderly Americans, people with disabilities and widows and orphans out of poverty. Make no mistake about it: the attempt to destroy Social Security has nothing to do with deficit reduction. Social Security today has a $2.6 trillion dollar surplus, can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible American for the next 27 years and has not contributed one nickel to the deficit. This is an ideological struggle on the part of Republicans in Congress and their billionaire backers to undo the most significant government social program in the history of the United States. They want Wall Street to provide retirement benefits, not Social Security – not because this is a better plan for seniors, but because it ensures massive profits for Wall Street.

My question is: Is social security really running a surplus in 2009 and 2010? The reason I ask is precisely due to the fact that many Americans have been laid off or can't work. With fewer people paying into the system, is there really a surplus?

Another aspect to this question: I thought that Bush/the Repukes squandered the SS surplus on wars and tax cuts for the wealthy. Those policies remained in tact throughout the decade. However, we managed to experience surpluses up until 2009. I'm well aware that there's nothing wrong with social security. The program is fully solvent for many, many decades. However, I question this issue of a surplus.

Can someone explain this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Like many good things in life, the surplus likely returned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I might be a little slow today, as I stayed up watching the Falcons lose
a game that they should not have lost.

Can you please elaborate on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The Conress borrowed against SS (for years), now they want an excuse to break it...
hand the mangled remains over to Wall St. vultures and pay THEM back (another bailout) for the "losses".

Those of us who paid into the program will lose our investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Already my husband has started making a "News clipping" file of
Edited on Wed Dec-29-10 01:37 AM by truedelphi
Articles in various sections of the news paper and internet that are talking about the "irresponsible" baby boomers Apparently we baby boomers were off at Woodstock for so many long decades that we never contributed anything to any of the retirement funds set up.

I don't know who the article really refers too - in fact many that went to Woodstock were from rather affluent families and certainly have saved.

I saved for my retirement as an "indie" contractor who was required to not only put in my seven and a half percent but also the employer's side of it too. We also contributed nine percent of our income to a California State Employees retirement plan - which basically evaporated when we were faced with saving his life or saving the retirement. (We happened to be insured at the time this happened by the way.)

So the Powers that be have their "Cover Story." We were all too busy playing air guitar, and why oh why should the younger generations have to help us, and why in the world do we need to mention the 2.1 surplus monies in the Social Security Fund - those are needed now to cover Bernanke and Geithner's respective asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. The large pool of money you're describing
was borrowed away and replaced by bonds - 2 trillion worth has been lent out since 2007 or so. The bonds are a promise to the American people that the government is good for the money. So it's solvent if we're still good for it.

Pension funds work the same way. The money goes in, and it's borrowed against to the max. If there's a shortfall when it comes time to pay up, tough shit. It must be paid out some other way.

At least that's what we've been led to believe when we entered these social contracts. Now they're trying to find a way out of holding their end of the bargain - mostly because they probably can't. If the ratings on the bonds issued were to crash from default, taxation is the only thing we'll be able to run on. Since nobody's willing to raise taxes to pay for our shit, this and foreign investment is pretty much all we got to cover the shortfalls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spyderama Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. A True American Hero
The big question is when are we going to elect a lot more just like him?

<http://www.e-tabitha.com/2010/12/smoke-mirrors.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bernie is the MAN!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. thank you senator....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I will certainly help
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 04:00 PM by me b zola
We are really strapped financially, but if I give a small amount and others give what they can, it will add up. Bernie has been one of the few bright spots in our political landscape, and I don't want to lose him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. It's generous of you to consider giving to Bernie, but if you're really strapped
don't do it. Bernie will certainly be re-elected. In Vermont, big money candidates never win. there's a positive antipathy toward them.

I love telling this story to illustrate that:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Tuttle

And in 2006, Bernie won handily over deep pockets "Richie Rich" Tarrant:

n 2005, Tarrant announced his candidacy for the US Senate seat vacated by the retirement of United States SenateSenator Jim Jeffords (I-Vermont). On September 12, 2006, he won the Republican nomination, defeating US Air Force Lt. Col. Greg Parke and marijuana legalization activist Cris Ericson. Tarrant faced Independent Representative Bernie Sanders in the November general election. Sanders, who won the Democratic nomination but ran as an Independent, defeated Tarrant by 33 percentage points<3> . The race proved to be the most expensive race in Vermont history with both candidates spending close to $13 million. Tarrant spent roughly $7 million of his own money in the race and Sanders raised roughly $6.5 million and spent most of it. Tarrant's campaign was remarkable for its saturation of radio and television with a serial biography of the candidate and attack ads of Sanders.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Tarrant

Don't worry, about Bernie raising money either, he'll raise all he needs.


there's virtually no chance of Bernie being defeated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. If Bernie can stand for 8 hours on our behalf
I can cut a corner or two to swing him a few bucks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. HUGE K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. At this moment in time Bernie is one of the very few on whom I will spend
the thousand dollar war chest I am building for the 2012 elections. That is about the limit I can stretch. I hope everyone who can, will begin to build such a warchest for the coming showdown be it $5 a month or whatever. We cannot be unprepared for the election that will decide the course of this planet in peril from abject criminal and unbridled greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wonder why he doesn't mention the conservaDems who also seek these same goals as the GOP... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thank you, Senator Sanders! I will be one of those contributors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC