Indignant commentary regarding Michael Vick!

[Zanzobar]

[superduperfarleft]

1. Yet another OP from people complaining about the number of Vick OPs!

[Gidney N Cloyd]

2. Reply that agrees with you yet of course causes an undesired kick to the thread.

[blondeatlast]

5. Polite written gesture of gratitude for causing the offending thread to

rise yet again in the forum.

Possible inclusion of sarcastic remark.

[Gidney N Cloyd]

8. Insincere reminder about forum tools for managing threads.

[denem]

10. Welcome to my ignore list.

[cottonseed]

3. I don't know em. But I don't like em.

[blondeatlast]

6. Here:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=meta

[tularetom]

4. Sarcastic response from Vick supporter

And threat to unrecommend.

[cottonseed]

7. Seriously though. Do you really see it as for or against Michael Vick?

I mean really. I know that I'm posting not for Michael Vick, but in disgust at the nature of attacks toward the guy. It's reached a pitch that I think is going too far.

It has nothing to do with Michael Vick. Does it for you?

[blondeatlast]

11. Time to fine tune your irony/sarcasm/humor detector.

See post 6 for some assistance.

[denem]

12. You go to 11.

[denem]

9. Reply: Are you a Vegan?

[Kurovski]

13. Accidental, incomprehensible response meant for another Vick thread.