Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. changes how it measures long-term unemployment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:49 PM
Original message
U.S. changes how it measures long-term unemployment
U.S. changes how it measures long-term unemployment

By Rick Hampson, USA TODAY
So many Americans have been jobless for so long that the government is changing how it records long-term unemployment.
Citing what it calls "an unprecedented rise" in long-term unemployment, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), beginning Saturday, will raise from two years to five years the upper limit on how long someone can be listed as having been jobless.

The move could help economists better measure the severity of the nation's prolonged economic downturn.

The change is a sign that bureau officials "are afraid that a cap of two years may be 'understating the true average duration' — but they won't know by how much until they raise the upper limit," says Linda Barrington, an economist who directs the Institute for Compensation Studies at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations.


http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-12-28-1Ajobless28_ST_N.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. ahhhh
that is going to hurt. Wish they would paint the right picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. from two years to five years...later they will need to change it to ten years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why was there a limit? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would guess
The thinking was that if you have been out of work for more than two years then you are unlikely to reenter the labor force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There was no limit on being counted
What the article was referring to was that when asking how long someone had been looking for work, there was an upper bound of 99 weeks. Anything more than that was classified as 99 weeks. So this change won't affect the number of unemployed, and probably won't change any published numbers (since Table A-12 of the Employment Situation, duration of unemployment, only has the categories of less than 5 weeks, 5 to 14 weeks, 15 weeks and over, 15 to 26 weeks, and more than 27 weeks.

All this does is allow better calculation of long term unemployed. Here is the BLS Announcement
Effective with data for January 2011, the Current Population Survey (CPS) will be modified to allow respondents to report longer durations of unemployment. Presently, the CPS accepts unemployment durations of up to 2 years; any response of unemployment duration greater than this is entered as 2 years. Starting with data for January 2011, respondents will be able to report unemployment durations of up to 5 years. This change will likely affect estimates of average (mean) duration of unemployment. The change will not affect the estimate of the number of unemployed persons and will not affect other data series on the duration of unemployment.
bolding mine

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC