The Top Ten Conservative
Idiots (No. 152)
April
19, 2004
Turkey and Mustard Edition
So, did you see Bush on tee-vee last Tuesday? Four words: Worst. Press Conference. Ever. His ridiculous performance earned him the top three spots on this week's list. But that's not all. He and Cheney collectively earned the number four slot for their massive tax windfall they both received this year from the Tax Cut. (Must be nice to have the power to stuff fat cash into your own pocket like that.) Rounding out the list, we've got some familiar faces: John Ashcroft (5) is blaming Bill Clinton for 9/11. Randall Terry (7) of Operation Rescue has a gay kid. (Oh, the horror!) And Antonin Scalia (9) has learned an important lesson. Enjoy, and as usual, don't forget the key!
George
W. Bush
Millions of viewers tuned in to George W. Bush's primetime press conference
last Tuesday, and immediately tuned out again when they realized that American
Idol had been pre-empted. But those viewers really should have "stayed
the course," because they missed out on a performance
just as half-baked and devoid of talent, as hilarious and yet downright sad,
as any of American Idol's worst auditions. Think William Hung in a suit - just
as Hung has made a career out of repeating "she bangs" over and over
again until it ceases to be funny and merely annoys the piss out of you, so
George W. Bush continued to drag out the same tired old platitudes last Tuesday
night. Regardless of the question being asked, Bush returned again and again
to the safe havens of "freedom," "terra," "war on terra,"
and even that old stand-by, "weapons of mass destruction." What's
your best prediction on how long U.S. troops will have to be in Iraq? The
Iraqis want freedom. You said that the Iraqis would welcome us with sweets
and flowers - how do you explain to Americans how you got that so wrong? Saddam
Hussein used weapons of mass destruction against his own people. Why are
you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the 9-11 commission?
I look forward to answering their questions. Sorry George. America may
not have voted yet, but you're in the bottom three tonight.
George
W. Bush
While George formed a lot of substanceless sentences from a lot of substanceless
words last Tuesday, it was what he didn't say that proved to be quite
telling. When asked the question, "You've looked back before 9-11 for what
mistakes might have been made. After 9-11, what would your biggest mistake be,
would you say, and what lessons have you learned from it?" Bush clung to
the podium, cast his eyes to the heavens as if looking for divine inspiration,
looked at his feet for a while and shook his head, before finally blurting out,
"You know, I just - I'm sure something will pop into my head here"
(for video, visit this
link, open it up in RealPlayer, and skip ahead to 50:58). The
Worst President
Ever then went on to explain that he was having trouble "in the midst
of this press conference, with all the pressure of trying to come up with answer."
Um, I hate to break it to you, numbnuts, but you're the Commander-in-Chief of
the United States of America. And you can't even handle the pressure of a press
conference? I'm going to start calling you Jello W. Bush from now on.
Jello
W. Bush
![]()
To be fair, there was one line that stuck out during Dubya's incoherent
blatherings at the press conference. Yes, he was talking about weapons of mass
destruction - again - but we can apparently now add 50 tons of mustard gas in
a turkey farm to all the VX, anthrax, yellowcake and aluminum tubes. That's
right - it wouldn't be a press conference without Our Great Leader telling fibs
about stockpiles of WMDs. During his non-answer to the question "what's
your biggest mistake?" Bush started going on about how he still thinks
that WMDs will be found: "See, I'm of the belief that we'll find out the
truth on the weapons. That's why we sent up the independent commission. I look
forward to hearing the truth as to exactly where they are. They could still
be there. They could be hidden, like the 50 tons of mustard gas in a turkey
farm." Now, for those of you unfamiliar with the 50 tons of mustard gas
in a turkey farm story, here's the deal. Bush was talking about Libya's voluntary
disclosure of weapons earlier this year, during which inspectors discovered
- you guessed it - 50 tons of mustard gas in a turkey farm. Except... the day
after the press conference Scott McClellan had to clarify
Bush's statement, because apparently only 23.6 tons of mustard gas were found.
Oh, and the substance was actually found scattered across Libya, not at the
turkey farm. Um, in fact, there wasn't any mustard gas at the turkey farm at
all, just unfilled munitions. So technically Bush's statement was correct, apart
from the bit about "50 tons of mustard gas in a turkey farm." You
know, it's not surprising that Bush can't think of any mistakes he's made since
9/11, considering that he DOESN'T HAVE A BRAIN.
Jello
W. Bush and Dick Cheney
![]()
But that's enough about Bush's piss-poor press conference. Let's turn our attention
instead to tax cuts for the rich. It was revealed last week that "President
Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney reaped tax benefits last year from the cuts
that they pushed through Congress," according
to the Associated Press. Jello
and Pickles paid a mere 28 percent of their adjusted gross income for 2003 compared
to 31 percent in 2002, while Crashcart and, uh, Lynne, paid a piddling 20 percent
of their $1.3 million income compared to 29 percent in 2002. So it's good to
know that Bush's tax cuts are going to help those who really need it. A White
House spokesperson said that the tax cuts have "had the effect of spurring
economic growth and creating jobs." Yeah, right. With a bit of luck, Bush's
elitist tax reform will have the same effect on his job this year as
it's had on the jobs of three million of his fellow Americans since he came
into office.
John
Ashcroft
The Crisco Kid himself appeared before the 9/11 Commission last week to explain
why everything that the Bush administration did leading up to September 11 was
in fact the fault of the Clinton administration. According to Ashcroft's version
of the story, he "moved quickly" to focus the nation on fighting terrorism
as soon as he got into office, which I guess would explain
why former interim FBI director Thomas J. Pickard testified before the Commission
that Ashcroft specifically asked not to be briefed about terrorism. I guess
it would also explain why Ashcroft testified that "We did not know an attack
was coming, because for nearly a decade our government had blinded itself to
its enemies," despite the fact that Condoleezza Rice already testified
that the Clinton plan was a good one, which is why she chose to keep it in place
and retain Richard Clarke. And
I guess that it would also explain why, according
to the UK Guardian, on September 10, 2001 Ashcroft "sent a request
for budget increases to the White House. It covered 68 programs, none of them
related to counter-terrorism." Oh, and he "also sent a memorandum
to his heads of departments, stating his seven priorities. Counter-terrorism
was not on the list." Oh yeah, and let's not forget that he "turned
down an FBI request for hundreds more agents to be assigned to tracking terrorist
threats." Damn you, Bill Clinton and your terrorist-loving penis! Look
what you made John Ashcroft do!
Robert
Owsiany
![]()
Speaking of attorneys general, meet Robert Owsiany, former deputy state attorney
general from Pittsburgh. Owsiany - a Republican Party activist - is somewhat
infamous in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, where he served as the local GOP
solicitor, because according
to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, "The GOP-dominated county Board
of Elections hired Owsiany to investigate allegations of absentee ballot fraud
in Kennedy between 1997 and 2002. His report alleged township Democrats were
involved in an organized effort to forge absentee ballots in municipal primaries
and elections...A federal probe was initiated, but criminal charges have not
been filed in the case. County Treasurer John Weinstein and his father, Kennedy
Treasurer Melvin Weinstein, longtime Democratic Party power players, disputed
any wrongdoing and argued Owsiany's report was tainted. They contended Owsiany
was a 'hired gun for the Republican Party.'" But anyway, that's all water
under the bridge. Owsiany's got other things on his plate at the moment, not
least of which is the fact that he apparently had to step
down from his position last month "after the FBI seized the hard drive
of his office computer in a child pornography investigation." Tsk, tsk.
Randall
Terry
Is there anything more embarrassing for a militant anti-abortion/anti-same-sex
marriage activist and all round right-wing nutcase than your son revealing that
he is gay? That's what just
happened to Randall Terry, the former head of Operation Rescue. See, Terry's
son Jamiel wrote a recent article for Out magazine, and now Terry is
pissed. Apparently Jamiel, who Terry adopted when he was eight years
old, came out to his father two years ago, but making it public has driven
Terry bonkers. In a recent essay on right-wing turd-outlet WorldNetDaily.com,
he says that "Jamiel is incredibly gifted. He is articulate and handsome.
He sings like an angel, he plays the piano, he's a great cook, and he's a great
debater. He would make a powerful lawyer and a formidable politician."
Now, I have no doubt that Jamiel is all those things and more, which is why
it's kinda confusing when Terry goes on to say, "My son is a young man
in crisis who needs intervention and therapy, not heady interviews with CNN....
And Out magazine is despicable for their participation in a sham and
exploiting my son for their own political agenda." Uh, so your 24-year-old
son would make a great lawyer or politician, but he also needs intervention
and therapy and Out magazine is exploiting him? What a load of crap.
Three big cheers for Terry the Younger, several hundred large boos for Terry
the Elder.
Ben
Nighthorse-Campbell
Former Democrat-turned-traitor Sen. Ben Nighthorse-Campbell of Colorado got
into a spot of hot water last week when he made a crass joke about the Coors
Light twins. Campbell is retiring this year, and beer magnate Pete Coors has
indicated that he will run on the Republican ticket to replace him. So Rocky
Mountain News columnist Mike Littwin decided to ask Campbell about one of
the most important issues of the upcoming campaign - what he thought of the
Coors Light twins. Littwin showed the Senator a picture of the twins and asked
him if he saw a problem with it. "Whoa, what the hell's the matter with
that?" Campbell replied. "Hey, what have you got in your pants?" Oh my,
what... gravitas. So Littwin dutifully reported the Senator's comments in his
column last week. But here's the funny thing: the day after the column was published,
Campbell claimed that he'd been set up. "I didn't even say it. I had two
of my staff right with me, and I didn't even say it," he blustered. "But,
it miraculously showed up in print." Miraculously indeed. Good job Littwin had
a tape of the incident which the Rocky Mountain News decided to publish
on their website, along with a convenient transcript. Enjoy
the show.
Antonin Scalia
![]()
And now, a follow-up on last
week's story about Antonin Scalia having one of his goons erase the tapes
of two reporters who were recording a recent speech he was giving at a Mississippi
high school. Scalia wrote an apology to both reporters, saying, "As I understand
it from press reports, a United States Marshal erased, or caused you to erase,
the tape recorder that you were using for the purpose of assuring the accuracy
of your press report. I imagine that is an upsetting and indeed enraging experience..."
According
to the Associated Press, "vowed he would make it clear in the future
that recording his remarks for the use of the print media would not be a problem."
Said he, "I have learned my lesson." Uh, hang on a second - isn't
it a bit late for a Supreme Court Justice to be learning lessons about the First
Amendment?
The
U.S. Forest Service
![]()
And finally, the U.S. Forest Service recently put out a brochure which insists
that more logging is imperative to prevent wildfires in the Sierra Nevada. Want
proof? The brochure contains six photos which demonstrate how the "forests
of the past" were in fact much sparser than the forests of today. The photos
- taken in 1909, 1948, 1958, 1968, 1979 and 1989 - show an open area of forest
which, in each picture, becomes filled with more and more trees and underbrush.
The pamphlet says, "Today's forests, dense with green, may seem beautiful,
but in fact are deadly... Our old-growth forests are choking with brush, tinder-dry
debris and dead trees which make the risk of catastrophic fire high." There's
just one tiny problem - it was recently revealed
that the 1909 photo used in the brochure was taken
after the area had been logged, so that would explain the large, open area with
hardly any trees or underbrush. Oh yes, and there's one other minor detail they
left out of the brochure - the 1909 photo was taken in Montana, which is nowhere
near the Sierra Nevada. In fact, the photo originally appeared in a 1983 Forest
Service research report and was captioned "cleanup operations on the Lick Creek
timber sale." A Forest Service spokesperson said "Our goal here was to...
increase the clarity and understandability of our message. We needed to be accurate
but not necessarily precise to the 99th degree." Well all I can say is thank
goodness the Bush administration has made blatant manipulation and outright
distortion acceptable in today's society, or someone would probably get into
trouble for this. See you next week!