General Discussion

PatrickforB

(14,613 posts)

34. I have not seen such things, but if so will surely alert. That is not OK. Just because

Thu Apr 25, 2024, 11:16 PM

Apr 25

the right wing speaks of these things does not mean we should.

Ever.

We must be careful not to stoop to the adversary's cruelty and corruption, because if we do then how are we any better?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why, on Democratic Underground, [View all] sarisataka Apr 25 OP

Never Rebl2 Apr 25 #1

I haven't seen that senseandsensibility Apr 25 #2

That is certainly the best way MuseRider Apr 25 #3

Look on page 1 of GD sarisataka Apr 25 #6

Which OP's ? Let's get them taken down ! KS Toronado Apr 25 #30

Venting (very inappropriately). But that is not allowed here hlthe2b Apr 25 #4

Guess I missed those posts, but if that's happening, wnylib Apr 25 #5

Look in GD... sarisataka Apr 25 #7

Haven't they been alerted and removed yet? wnylib Apr 25 #10

. sarisataka Apr 25 #11

I alerted on the one I saw MustLoveBeagles Apr 25 #27

Not allowed. Please report if and when you see any post suggesting physical harm to anyone. Fla Dem Apr 25 #8

Alert on it. Kingofalldems Apr 25 #9

Nobody is suggesting that. perfessor Apr 25 #12

It would probably be helpful for the Justices to understand that they would make themselves.... kentuck Apr 25 #26

I'd love to see the someone present this discussion to them in exactly those terms. LT Barclay Apr 25 #31

Heck, even Joyce Vance pointed out soldierant Apr 25 #36

I haven't seen people doing that. Elessar Zappa Apr 25 #13

No, not seeing that at all. sheshe2 Apr 25 #14

The most explicit one said sarisataka Apr 25 #17

I think one hypothetical post about the scenario is enough, but that's just my opinion. LeftInTX Apr 25 #15

The SCOTUS will come up with a pseudo legal argument why only Lucky Luciano Apr 25 #20

That's a reasonable observation and question Hekate Apr 25 #16

There is one responce to a post in GD revmclaren Apr 25 #18

My question about the President assassinating a Supreme Court Justice was to show how silly Trump's argument is. surfered Apr 25 #19

It's meant to provoke thought. Not to be taken seriously. mzmolly Apr 25 #21

I get the sense they are more sdfernando Apr 25 #22

That is one point of view... DemocraticPatriot Apr 25 #33

Or...can a hypothetical thought exercise be used like Trump using a quote to get around violating the gag order? elocs Apr 26 #41

It's a propaganda tsunami. kentuck Apr 25 #23

go ahead and post some links Skittles Apr 25 #24

Satirists. We are becoming satirists. dchill Apr 25 #25

And trolls never sleep. nt Brenda Apr 26 #42

People need to be careful about what they post. Even when trying to be funny. mucifer Apr 25 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocraticPatriot Apr 25 #29

Steam release. chouchou Apr 25 #32

I have not seen such things, but if so will surely alert. That is not OK. Just because PatrickforB Apr 25 #34

I have not seen that once. Never mind multiple times. mahina Apr 25 #35

If you can't link to examples mountain grammy Apr 25 #37

A direct link could be considered a call out sarisataka Apr 25 #38

I suggested raising the hypothetical in court... JT45242 Apr 25 #39

I think "asking about" and discussing... Think. Again. Apr 26 #40

Gee it just might be rhetorical hyperbole Voltaire2 Apr 26 #43

My rule of thumb is simple sarisataka Apr 26 #45

Scratch a liberal... WhiskeyGrinder Apr 26 #44