Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(7,335 posts)
31. It's called a long s
Tue May 7, 2024, 09:57 PM
May 7
The long s ⟨ſ⟩, also known as the medial s or initial s, is an archaic form of the lowercase letter ⟨s⟩, found mostly in works of the late 8th to early 19th centuries. It replaced the single s, or one or both of the letters s in a double-s sequence (e.g., "ſinfulneſs" for "sinfulness" and "poſſeſs" or "poſseſs" for "possess", but never "poſſeſſ" ).
...
In general, the long s fell out of use in roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good-quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824 and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century, and is sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons. Woodhouse's The Principles of Analytical Calculation, published by the Cambridge University Press in 1803, uses the long s throughout its roman text.
...
The long s disappeared from new typefaces rapidly in the mid-1790s, and most printers who could afford to do so had discarded older typefaces by the early years of the 19th century. Pioneer of type design John Bell (1746–1831), who started the British Letter Foundry in 1788, is often "credited with the demise of the long s". Paul W. Nash concluded that the change mostly happened very fast in 1800, and believes that this was triggered by the Seditious Societies Act. To discourage subversive publications, this required printing to name the identity of the printer, and so in Nash's view gave printers an incentive to make their work look more modern.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_s
I don't think they even had journalistic ethics back then... ExciteBike66 May 7 #1
Yeah funny, they actually oppose tyranny back then. Go figure. unblock May 7 #3
Didn't even have "the press" as in newspapers, maybe Boston, NYC,...They were called "printers" and they generally made Backseat Driver May 7 #16
LOLOLOL!!! elleng May 7 #2
Ha! unblock May 7 #8
Historians have been clutching their heads over that myth for generations. Aristus May 7 #18
Yeah, other that authors in a book, I view any quote as suspicious. unblock May 7 #19
British regulars ITAL May 7 #27
John Adams wrote Wednesdays May 7 #4
If they had today's media back then, unblock May 7 #5
Well, if you were too "anti-establishment", yagotme May 7 #7
Who owns the ink decides what stinks IA8IT May 7 #6
Probably both since about 20% of the colonists were loyalists(Tories). Sneederbunk May 7 #9
There were reporters awaiting the British at the airports. n/t Harker May 7 #10
Ha! Right, how could I forget unblock May 7 #11
I don't believe there was a British Invasion until the Beatles C_U_L8R May 7 #12
Well you know, you better free your mind instead... unblock May 7 #13
note: the brrittish didn't really invade, they were already here..... getagrip_already May 7 #14
The Beatles were 150 years late, then. Igel May 7 #30
Newspapers in America were historically incredibly partisan Sympthsical May 7 #15
Lincoln shut down over 300 newspapers. former9thward May 7 #17
Yep Sympthsical May 7 #21
I know this is sarcasm post and I'm responding with a few boring old circulars, so irony and humor is likely dead..LOL LeftInTX May 7 #20
What's with all the "F"s in words that don't have F's in the obit? Drunk typesetter or what? F instead of S EX500rider May 7 #24
I have no idea. It's like that in all of them:. Maffachuffets, Bofton, Conftitional, Domeflick etc LOL LeftInTX May 7 #25
That's how an "s" inside a word was configured in printing. marybourg May 7 #26
It's not an f, grumpyduck May 7 #28
It's called a long s Emrys May 7 #31
When the British defended the colonies against rebels DavidDvorkin May 7 #22
Social Media of the day crucified the British but the government posters made threats. Wonder Why May 7 #23
The British didn't "invade" the colonies Docreed2003 May 7 #29
Thank you GenThePerservering May 7 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just out of curiosity, wh...»Reply #31