Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MIT suspends student protesters [View all]BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,248 posts)1. san diego, students block cop bus
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How many other institutions of higher learning are planning to suspend the First Amendment
elleng
May 8
#2
If they came on to my property and I didn't agree with them yes. I tell trumpers all the time I don't want their
AZLD4Candidate
May 8
#14
It's disgusting how the civil rights movement is compared to these whiny privileged kids with no real skin in the game.
BannonsLiver
May 8
#46
I thought it was a terrible comparison too, but when you defend the indefenisble, you need to stretch logic to its
AZLD4Candidate
May 8
#51
"Those people" weren't whining about getting "humanitarian aid" airdropped from the school cafeteria
tritsofme
May 8
#22
It's like comparing J6ers to Civil Rights marchers, a comparison that makes no sense and is blatantly offensive.
tritsofme
May 8
#35
I was specifically addressing the 'it is private property so their rights are forfeit' argument.
Celerity
May 8
#39
snarky (tag-teaming off the previous poster's use) emojis as the entire body of reply are such a profound rebuttal
Celerity
May 8
#75
There's no point in engaging with bad faith interlocutors. This is pure unvarnished pointing and laughing.
AnrothElf
May 8
#78
you accusing me of being a bad faith poster here is risible, with or without my own use of an emoji for emphasis of that
Celerity
May 8
#80
What can I say? You might take yourself seriously, but the rest of us are not similarly obliged.
AnrothElf
May 8
#83
'the rest of us'? Wow, I did not know I was dealing with THE poster of record, the voice for all DUers. Should I curtsy?
Celerity
May 8
#90
Just letting you know that nobody is obliged to take you seriously. Nobody at all. So yes...
AnrothElf
May 8
#101
that 'not taking me seriously' and offering nothing but a snarky emoji in terms of any response tells the true tale
Celerity
May 8
#102
Ridicule is a time-honored way of dealing with people who are impossible to take seriously.
AnrothElf
May 8
#103
No one has the fucking right to assault anyone regardless of trespassing or private property.
SoFlaBro
May 9
#118
What do you think dumping chemicals on someone's head and pulling them off of a stool is defined as?
SoFlaBro
May 9
#120
and out comes the broad brush, tossing all of the protesters into the same basket of denigration, framing each and every
Celerity
May 8
#82
You are the one who made the expansive, potentially universalised, broad brush claim. Prove it.
Celerity
May 8
#92
Apparently whiny privileged private college students are a protected class now?
AZSkiffyGeek
May 8
#89
You must not be too familiar with the backgrounds of many of the students at American universities, including MIT.
Celerity
May 8
#93
Almost as good as harassing Jews, kidnapping maintenance workers and trashing buildings
AZSkiffyGeek
May 8
#95
broad brush lumping of all protesters in 1 basket of negativity, thus stigmatising all protest against Israel's actions
Celerity
May 8
#28
You are the one lumping all protestors in 1 basket, but you make the shallow and false analogy that
Nixie
May 8
#53
"Congress shall make no law. . ." Private universities, property owners, DU, a grocery store, or your boss
AZLD4Candidate
May 8
#55
It's a private institution. And the 1A doesn't give protesters the right to threaten students, faculty, or *
Oopsie Daisy
May 8
#6
Almost. And private property that's "open to the public" does not mean that the owners give up any rights *
Oopsie Daisy
May 8
#43
Sure, back to my original point, that colleges and universities ought to promote free speech not suppress it.
Voltaire2
May 8
#44
Sorry, you're talking in circles. Back to MY original point... 1A doesn't trump all other rights.
Oopsie Daisy
May 8
#56
The proud boys most certainly have the right to express their shitty opinions in public.
Voltaire2
May 8
#45
It was anti-semitic...there are video's and testimony of Jewish kids being refused enterance in college libraries.
Demsrule86
May 8
#59
Columbia suspended protesters in 1968. But they are not being suspended for protesting.
LeftInTX
May 8
#7
I don't agree. You can say what you want. But that doesn't mean there won't be consequences. MIT is a private universty.
Demsrule86
May 8
#58
Do you have an understanding of the 1st Amendment & how it applies & doesnt apply?
oldsoftie
May 8
#84
They're breaking several rules & disobeying the decree by the University to NOT occupy the quad
oldsoftie
May 9
#113