General Discussion

Jilly_in_VA

(10,102 posts)

47. She and Marsha Blackburn

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #17)

Fri May 10, 2024, 05:13 PM

May 10

are Stepford sisters. Soulless robots created by RepubliKKKan men.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

113 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sen. Katie Britt Introduces Bill to Create Federal Database of Pregnant People [View all] Nevilledog May 10 OP

Hey, Senator Britt... TSExile May 10 #1

I'm male, 72, and pregnant. Sign me up sicko. twodogsbarking May 10 #60

You're on to something. The handmaid senator is too stupid to realize that the sign ups will be flooded with protest Comfortably_Numb May 10 #75

That's how people took down Youngkin's (VA gov) rat out the teacher hotline. spooky3 May 10 #81

This interests me -- I did not know this had been done before. Keep us posted if you find out anything more. Hekate May 10 #90

I don't expect to hear more. The hotline was shut down more spooky3 May 10 #93

I'm 61 but I recently had a dream that I was pregnant. Crunchy Frog May 11 #96

NOTHING screams HIPAA like a federal database of pregnant people!! bucolic_frolic May 10 #2

Under some really big rocks! Lonestarblue May 10 #26

Alabama, for example. dchill May 10 #62

Reminds me of those creepy repugnant period trackers that were tracking pubescent detainees in the cages to track their Comfortably_Numb May 10 #77

It's probably not technically a HIPAA violation Crunchy Frog May 11 #97

The next database will be all women of child bearing age. Irish_Dem May 10 #3

documentation of when.................... Lovie777 May 10 #11

And special rewards for friends, family, co-workers who snitch on women. Irish_Dem May 10 #13

As long as they add the men/boys who are ejaculating wantonly erronis May 10 #54

Males will never be restricted like women are. Irish_Dem May 10 #57

I love that bit! Mossfern May 10 #70

All females, including minors. Have to keep track of those wanton niyad May 10 #76

Can we all spam the site? IcyPeas May 10 #4

No, because there won't be one. brooklynite May 10 #6

Not yet TxGuitar May 10 #37

Gimme the site, I'll do it. Jilly_in_VA May 10 #45

Who's pregnant is the concern of neither the government NanaCat May 10 #5

The legislation will require all pregnant women to wear one of those "Baby On Board" stickers. sop May 10 #7

An arm band. Must be worn 24/7. Irish_Dem May 10 #30

Ear tags musette_sf May 10 #39

That's even better. Irish_Dem May 10 #40

Yellow, in the shape of a COL Mustard May 10 #51

No, it'll be a permanent sticker on the forehead that detects the fetal chemicals. erronis May 10 #58

We can't have a national gun registry but we can have a national registry of pregnant women? PeaceWave May 10 #8

Apparently the GOP sees it this way. Irish_Dem May 10 #14

Considered, by the men folk, to be a danger to ourselves. sheshe2 May 10 #84

Women for most of history were property of their father or husband. Irish_Dem May 10 #89

Will they outlaw over the counter pregnancy tests, too? CrispyQ May 10 #9

Women will have to produce ID to purchase pregnancy tests. Irish_Dem May 10 #15

Wow. I've never contemplated that possibility. ecstatic May 10 #25

No contraception, no pregnancy tests, no abortions. Irish_Dem May 10 #42

Remember The Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005? sop May 10 #49

No problem-o. All us geezer girls, well beyond menopause, can purchase lots of tests (Go Fund Me?) and share Attilatheblond May 10 #74

Katie, with her baby fundy voice, promises to take care of our uteruses Nevilledog May 10 #94

Kinda 1984-ish Beausoleil May 10 #10

The title of this article is highly misleading. euphorb May 10 #12

The article does talk about a database of pregnant women. Irish_Dem May 10 #16

"Crisis Pregnancy Centers" Jilly_in_VA May 10 #46

Not misleading in the least kcr May 10 #59

Agree, euphorb. The title should be "database for pregnant women". TheRickles May 10 #73

What next, Katie? Bring back female genital mutilation? Can't have those not procreating enjoying sex, now hlthe2b May 10 #17

She has no shame whatsoever. Irish_Dem May 10 #31

She and Marsha Blackburn Jilly_in_VA May 10 #47

Black American mortality rate 69.9 deaths per 1,000 live births. underpants May 11 #102

This will cost taxpayers? oasis May 10 #18

Cost is no object when it comes to hunting down pregnant women. Irish_Dem May 10 #32

How about a database of men with erectile dysfunction CanonRay May 10 #19

Men's privacy must always be protected. Irish_Dem May 10 #33

It's good to be the King! COL Mustard May 10 #53

That was my first thought. mjvpi May 10 #83

How do they come up with these names? The "More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed Act" NM Grins May 10 #20

There must be some obscure Acronym Department. How else did we get the USAPATRIOTACT? Hekate May 10 #22

I noticed that,too. Geeesh Diamond_Dog May 10 #44

🔥Remember Nikolae Ceausescu of Romania? Decree 770 was the forced birth edict that filled orphanages... Hekate May 10 #21

That was a horrible situation. Irish_Dem May 10 #43

I doubt dear Katie's read that history. ❤️ littlemissmartypants May 10 #68

I doubt Dear Katie has two brain cells sparking in her head Hekate May 10 #92

do a gun owners database first ecstatic May 10 #23

Honey, I'm pregnant! Great, now we can get you fitted for a GPS ankle monitor! PeaceWave May 10 #24

When a pregnancy test is positive, a drone drops off your ankle monitor. Irish_Dem May 10 #34

When will Republicans go full Gilead and just imprison women for baby making? Lonestarblue May 10 #27

yep my first thought rurallib May 10 #55

Yep! Sperm is airborne, don't you know? Eyeball_Kid May 10 #85

More Oppression for Moms Surely. nt Shermann May 10 #28

Dang! Turbineguy May 10 #29

Just sign up as Turbinegal. Irish_Dem May 10 #35

Not unrealistic for someone trans. Dear Katie probably didn't consider that in her plan. ❤️ littlemissmartypants May 10 #69

OK. She is a witch that must be MOMFUDSKI May 10 #36

Please do not conflate her with those who practice the Craft of the Wise. niyad May 10 #79

the Party of Small Government everyone. ZonkerHarris May 10 #38

I doubt this will pass any time soon EnergizedLib May 10 #41

Fine, I'll see your Handmaiden's wet dream Aviation Pro May 10 #48

Where's that COL Mustard May 10 #50

'Pregnant People'? Is that supposed to sound better and less frightening than 'Pregnant women' ? Scalded Nun May 10 #52

How christian of her rurallib May 10 #56

Can anti forced birth advocates be proactive and sue these jerks Marthe48 May 10 #61

Time for SpermWatch. dchill May 10 #63

What scum. Fla Dem May 10 #65

Abhorrent. I doubt it was her idea, but she went along with the choir, I mean cult. c-rational May 10 #66

The GOP has devolved from supporting "small government" to supporting a totalitarian state of the kind Martin68 May 10 #67

GOP Gestation Gestapo Attilatheblond May 10 #71

She's a fucking idiot plus a waste of oxygen. Clearly her brain already doesn't get enough so why bother. ❤️ littlemissmartypants May 10 #72

Why do I get the feeling that this is just one more step in transforming women into reproductive slaves? patphil May 10 #78

Imagine the Repub outcry to a Dem initiative to "allow government officials to reach out to users for additional info" Beartracks May 10 #80

FUCK THE GODDAMNED WOMAN-HATING GESTATIONAL SLAVERS niyad May 10 #82

I mean, it's not like it would be used against women in multiple ways sakabatou May 10 #86

Fuck that shit Blue Owl May 10 #87

This will go nowhere fast. FloridaBlues May 10 #88

Katie Britt as Overly Attached Fetus Friend LudwigPastorius May 10 #91

Not in Michigan. roamer65 May 10 #95

Sanctimonious mutherfuckers. live love laugh May 11 #98

Does anyone remember when China was enforcing their one child law? Marthe48 May 11 #100

The fact that this "registration" is compulsory like The Draft no_hypocrisy May 11 #101

How about the high mortality rate for black women? Didn't I hear we have THE GREATEST HEALTHCARE IN THE WORLD??? underpants May 11 #103

As the gun nuts would say, "First is regristration then confiscation." Chainfire May 11 #104

no words poozwah May 11 #105

The reality of the effort is concerning, but the rhetoric used is lousy and ineffective gulliver May 11 #106

So, will branding be next ? rickford66 May 11 #107

And to identify them: DFW May 11 #108

Wouldn't it be easier Retrograde May 11 #109

Will Trump's bible and chastity bets be offered as reusable and handy "resources:. Ping Tung May 11 #110

Can the telescreen be far behind? Danmel May 11 #111

i'm gonna guess the term 'pregnant people' is not a direct quote from britt prodigitalson May 11 #112

Vice President Harris responds to Trump saying he wants to allow laws "monitoring" women's pregnancies LetMyPeopleVote May 13 #113