Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ferrets are Cool

(21,106 posts)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:47 PM Dec 2017

Concerning the "protest votes" that I keep hearing

cost Clinton the election. Can someone point me to a link or "something" that proves that the "protest vote"
was what lost the election to the PGIC.
I have searched and searched and cannot find definitive proof of this, only conjecture.

One of the clearest things I did find was on the NPR site...https://www.npr.org/2016/11/12/501848636/7-reasons-donald-trump-won-the-presidential-election.
It lists 7 reasons why she lost and nowhere do I find protest votes.

This is something I've been curious about for some time and thought I would ask for help here. Please keep this civil if possible.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Concerning the "protest votes" that I keep hearing (Original Post) Ferrets are Cool Dec 2017 OP
Here are a few numbers bearsfootball516 Dec 2017 #1
But this is my legitimate question.... Ferrets are Cool Dec 2017 #3
There's no real way to tell exactly how many are protest votes bearsfootball516 Dec 2017 #4
The idea it gives me is that the election was Ferrets are Cool Dec 2017 #5
There is no question that LIV's going third party hurt. NCTraveler Dec 2017 #2

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
1. Here are a few numbers
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:00 PM
Dec 2017

In Michigan, Trump defeated Clinton by roughly 11,000 votes.

In Michigan, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and other third party candidates received about 250,000 votes.

By comparison, third party candidates received about 50,000 votes in Michigan in 2012.

In Wisconsin, Trump defeated Clinton by about 23,000 votes.

In Wisconsin, Johnson, Stein and other 3rd party candidates received a little less than 200,000 votes.

The trend continues in Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc.

Ferrets are Cool

(21,106 posts)
3. But this is my legitimate question....
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 08:16 PM
Dec 2017

How are these PROTEST votes. Americans have always voted for 3rd party candidates. Hell, even Perot won 18.9% of the popular vote. Sometimes people just don't like either of the main candidates. On my ballot, there wasn't an option for PROTEST VOTE:

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
4. There's no real way to tell exactly how many are protest votes
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 08:29 PM
Dec 2017

But the fact that 3rd party votes skyrocketed in Michigan from 50,000 in 2012 to 250,000 in 2016 should give you an idea.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. There is no question that LIV's going third party hurt.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:03 PM
Dec 2017

The extent of that damage is unclear, in total. But they are extremists and it's what they do. Look at me!!!

If you call them LIV narcissistic extremists you don't have to put quotation marks around it. They weren't "protesting" with their votes. Hence the reason for quotation marks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Concerning the "protest v...